İbrahim Hakkı Karakuş, Erdoğdu Akça, Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz, Kemal Sayar
{"title":"自我同情、情绪调节和弹性作为纤维肌痛患者心理健康的预测因素:一项横断面研究。","authors":"İbrahim Hakkı Karakuş, Erdoğdu Akça, Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz, Kemal Sayar","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05905-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While the roles of self-compassion and cognitive emotion regulation in mental health are increasingly acknowledged, their specific impact on fibromyalgia (FM) remains understudied. Given the substantial psychological burden associated with FM, this study aimed to examine these constructs in relation to emotional distress and resilience. Specifically, we sought to: (1) compare self-compassion and emotion regulation strategies between FM patients and healthy controls; (2) explore their associations with depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and resilience; and (3) identify predictors of psychological distress, focusing on self-compassion and emotion regulation. The study included 160 participants (80 FM patients and 80 age- and gender-matched healthy controls) who completed validated instruments, including the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Group comparisons were conducted using Student's t tests. Pearson correlations assessed associations among psychological variables. Mediation analyses, performed using PROCESS macro with 5000 bootstrap resamples, tested whether resilience mediated the relationships between self-compassion and clinical outcomes. FM patients reported significantly lower self-compassion and greater use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies-particularly rumination and catastrophizing-compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Self-compassion was negatively correlated with depression and anxiety, while resilience was positively associated with self-compassion and inversely related to psychological distress. Regression analyses showed that self-compassion, rumination, catastrophizing, resilience, and pain intensity significantly predicted depression and anxiety. Resilience mediated the relationship between self-compassion and both depressive and anxiety symptoms, though no significant mediation was observed for pain intensity. FM patients experience heightened psychological distress, characterized by reduced self-compassion and increased use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. Self-compassion and emotion regulation emerged as key predictors of depression and anxiety, with resilience playing a mediating role in depressive symptoms. These findings underscore the potential of interventions that cultivate self-compassion and strengthen adaptive emotion regulation to improve psychological well-being in individuals with FM and support a more integrative approach to treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 7","pages":"153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158836/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self-compassion, emotion regulation, and resilience as predictors of psychological well-being in fibromyalgia patients: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"İbrahim Hakkı Karakuş, Erdoğdu Akça, Mehmet Tuncay Duruöz, Kemal Sayar\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00296-025-05905-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>While the roles of self-compassion and cognitive emotion regulation in mental health are increasingly acknowledged, their specific impact on fibromyalgia (FM) remains understudied. Given the substantial psychological burden associated with FM, this study aimed to examine these constructs in relation to emotional distress and resilience. Specifically, we sought to: (1) compare self-compassion and emotion regulation strategies between FM patients and healthy controls; (2) explore their associations with depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and resilience; and (3) identify predictors of psychological distress, focusing on self-compassion and emotion regulation. The study included 160 participants (80 FM patients and 80 age- and gender-matched healthy controls) who completed validated instruments, including the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Group comparisons were conducted using Student's t tests. Pearson correlations assessed associations among psychological variables. Mediation analyses, performed using PROCESS macro with 5000 bootstrap resamples, tested whether resilience mediated the relationships between self-compassion and clinical outcomes. FM patients reported significantly lower self-compassion and greater use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies-particularly rumination and catastrophizing-compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Self-compassion was negatively correlated with depression and anxiety, while resilience was positively associated with self-compassion and inversely related to psychological distress. Regression analyses showed that self-compassion, rumination, catastrophizing, resilience, and pain intensity significantly predicted depression and anxiety. Resilience mediated the relationship between self-compassion and both depressive and anxiety symptoms, though no significant mediation was observed for pain intensity. FM patients experience heightened psychological distress, characterized by reduced self-compassion and increased use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. Self-compassion and emotion regulation emerged as key predictors of depression and anxiety, with resilience playing a mediating role in depressive symptoms. These findings underscore the potential of interventions that cultivate self-compassion and strengthen adaptive emotion regulation to improve psychological well-being in individuals with FM and support a more integrative approach to treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"volume\":\"45 7\",\"pages\":\"153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12158836/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rheumatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05905-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05905-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Self-compassion, emotion regulation, and resilience as predictors of psychological well-being in fibromyalgia patients: a cross-sectional study.
While the roles of self-compassion and cognitive emotion regulation in mental health are increasingly acknowledged, their specific impact on fibromyalgia (FM) remains understudied. Given the substantial psychological burden associated with FM, this study aimed to examine these constructs in relation to emotional distress and resilience. Specifically, we sought to: (1) compare self-compassion and emotion regulation strategies between FM patients and healthy controls; (2) explore their associations with depression, anxiety, pain intensity, and resilience; and (3) identify predictors of psychological distress, focusing on self-compassion and emotion regulation. The study included 160 participants (80 FM patients and 80 age- and gender-matched healthy controls) who completed validated instruments, including the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS), Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Group comparisons were conducted using Student's t tests. Pearson correlations assessed associations among psychological variables. Mediation analyses, performed using PROCESS macro with 5000 bootstrap resamples, tested whether resilience mediated the relationships between self-compassion and clinical outcomes. FM patients reported significantly lower self-compassion and greater use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies-particularly rumination and catastrophizing-compared to healthy controls (p < 0.001). Self-compassion was negatively correlated with depression and anxiety, while resilience was positively associated with self-compassion and inversely related to psychological distress. Regression analyses showed that self-compassion, rumination, catastrophizing, resilience, and pain intensity significantly predicted depression and anxiety. Resilience mediated the relationship between self-compassion and both depressive and anxiety symptoms, though no significant mediation was observed for pain intensity. FM patients experience heightened psychological distress, characterized by reduced self-compassion and increased use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies. Self-compassion and emotion regulation emerged as key predictors of depression and anxiety, with resilience playing a mediating role in depressive symptoms. These findings underscore the potential of interventions that cultivate self-compassion and strengthen adaptive emotion regulation to improve psychological well-being in individuals with FM and support a more integrative approach to treatment.
期刊介绍:
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology.
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production.
Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.