强直性脊柱炎的治疗:射频消融和萘普生的叙述性回顾。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Akash Patel, Dev Patel, John DesRochers, Abdullah Noory, Brandon Goodwin, Don D Shamilov, David F Lo, Richard Jermyn
{"title":"强直性脊柱炎的治疗:射频消融和萘普生的叙述性回顾。","authors":"Akash Patel, Dev Patel, John DesRochers, Abdullah Noory, Brandon Goodwin, Don D Shamilov, David F Lo, Richard Jermyn","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2518046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Its pathophysiology remains unclear, complicating treatment development. Management aims to alleviate symptoms and control inflammation, but targeted strategies are lacking. This study compared the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and naproxen in axSpA treatment. A PubMed search was conducted on 14 March 2023 and 27 May 2025. RFA is a minimally invasive procedure that targets nerve endings to block pain signals, while naproxen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that reduces inflammation. We conducted a narrative review of axSpA patients treated with either RFA or naproxen, assessing pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life. Results showed that RFA was significantly more effective than naproxen in managing chronic pain. Patients receiving RFA reported greater pain reduction and better functional outcomes compared to those on naproxen. RFA provided prolonged relief, while naproxen's effectiveness diminished over time, limiting its long-term benefit. These findings suggest that RFA should be considered a preferred treatment for axSpA patients seeking long-term pain relief and improved quality of life. This study supports RFA's role in managing inflammatory spinal conditions and informs optimal axSpA treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ankylosing spondylitis management: a narrative review of radiofrequency ablation and naproxen.\",\"authors\":\"Akash Patel, Dev Patel, John DesRochers, Abdullah Noory, Brandon Goodwin, Don D Shamilov, David F Lo, Richard Jermyn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2025.2518046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Its pathophysiology remains unclear, complicating treatment development. Management aims to alleviate symptoms and control inflammation, but targeted strategies are lacking. This study compared the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and naproxen in axSpA treatment. A PubMed search was conducted on 14 March 2023 and 27 May 2025. RFA is a minimally invasive procedure that targets nerve endings to block pain signals, while naproxen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that reduces inflammation. We conducted a narrative review of axSpA patients treated with either RFA or naproxen, assessing pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life. Results showed that RFA was significantly more effective than naproxen in managing chronic pain. Patients receiving RFA reported greater pain reduction and better functional outcomes compared to those on naproxen. RFA provided prolonged relief, while naproxen's effectiveness diminished over time, limiting its long-term benefit. These findings suggest that RFA should be considered a preferred treatment for axSpA patients seeking long-term pain relief and improved quality of life. This study supports RFA's role in managing inflammatory spinal conditions and informs optimal axSpA treatment strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2518046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2518046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

轴性脊柱炎(axSpA)是一种慢性炎症性疾病,主要影响脊柱和骶髂关节,引起疼痛、僵硬和活动能力降低。其病理生理学尚不清楚,使治疗发展复杂化。治疗的目的是减轻症状和控制炎症,但缺乏针对性的策略。本研究比较了射频消融(RFA)和萘普生治疗axSpA的疗效。PubMed检索于2023年3月14日和2025年5月27日进行。RFA是一种针对神经末梢阻断疼痛信号的微创手术,而萘普生是一种减少炎症的非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)。我们对接受RFA或萘普生治疗的axSpA患者进行了叙述性回顾,评估疼痛缓解、功能改善和生活质量。结果显示,RFA治疗慢性疼痛的效果明显优于萘普生。与服用萘普生的患者相比,接受RFA的患者报告了更大的疼痛减轻和更好的功能结果。RFA提供了长期的缓解,而萘普生的有效性随着时间的推移而减弱,限制了其长期效益。这些发现表明RFA应该被认为是寻求长期疼痛缓解和改善生活质量的axSpA患者的首选治疗方法。本研究支持RFA在管理炎性脊柱疾病中的作用,并为最佳的axSpA治疗策略提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ankylosing spondylitis management: a narrative review of radiofrequency ablation and naproxen.

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic inflammatory disease primarily affecting the spine and sacroiliac joints, causing pain, stiffness, and reduced mobility. Its pathophysiology remains unclear, complicating treatment development. Management aims to alleviate symptoms and control inflammation, but targeted strategies are lacking. This study compared the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and naproxen in axSpA treatment. A PubMed search was conducted on 14 March 2023 and 27 May 2025. RFA is a minimally invasive procedure that targets nerve endings to block pain signals, while naproxen is a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) that reduces inflammation. We conducted a narrative review of axSpA patients treated with either RFA or naproxen, assessing pain relief, functional improvement, and quality of life. Results showed that RFA was significantly more effective than naproxen in managing chronic pain. Patients receiving RFA reported greater pain reduction and better functional outcomes compared to those on naproxen. RFA provided prolonged relief, while naproxen's effectiveness diminished over time, limiting its long-term benefit. These findings suggest that RFA should be considered a preferred treatment for axSpA patients seeking long-term pain relief and improved quality of life. This study supports RFA's role in managing inflammatory spinal conditions and informs optimal axSpA treatment strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信