左旋多巴和刺激对丘脑下核深部脑刺激帕金森病患者术后步态冻结的差异影响:临床和运动学分析。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Raquel Barbosa, Paulo Bastos, Patrícia Pita Lobo, Catarina Correia Rodrigues, Anabela Valadas, Leonor Correia Guedes, Beatriz Mano, Sara Alberto, Vitor Paixão, Mário Miguel Rosa, Ricardo Matias, Daniel Martins, Marcelo Mendonça, Miguel Coelho
{"title":"左旋多巴和刺激对丘脑下核深部脑刺激帕金森病患者术后步态冻结的差异影响:临床和运动学分析。","authors":"Raquel Barbosa, Paulo Bastos, Patrícia Pita Lobo, Catarina Correia Rodrigues, Anabela Valadas, Leonor Correia Guedes, Beatriz Mano, Sara Alberto, Vitor Paixão, Mário Miguel Rosa, Ricardo Matias, Daniel Martins, Marcelo Mendonça, Miguel Coelho","doi":"10.1002/mdc3.70170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The long-term efficacy of high-frequency subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on freezing of gait (FOG) remains unclear. We aimed to study the mechanism and optimal therapeutic approach to long-term post-surgery FOG.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to assess the mechanism and optimal therapeutic approach to long-term post-surgery FOG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen Parkinson's disease (PD) STN-DBS patients with a FOG score (item 3.11) ≥2 in the MedON/StimON condition were evaluated under 5 experimental conditions, including a low-frequency (60 Hz) condition maintaining the same total energy delivered. In each condition, gait and FOG episodes (#FOG) were assessed using clinical (eg, a 3 × 14-m Stand-Walk-Sit Test) and kinematic data from inertial measurement units (IMU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to MedOFF/StimOFF, #FOG significantly decreased in the MedON/StimON 130-Hz condition. Either stimulation or levodopa (LD) (MedOFF/StimON or MedON/StimOFF) also significantly reduced #FOG and Stand-Walk-Sit Test (SWS) time compared to MedOFF/StimOFF. No significant difference in #FOG episodes or SWS time was found between 130 and 60 Hz, though 60-Hz stimulation had lower axial scores. Individual responses to LD or stimulation varied: (1) 3 patients improved #FOG with LD but worsened with stimulation, whereas 5 exhibited the reverse; (2) in 9 patients, low-frequency stimulation outperformed high-frequency stimulation in reducing #FOG. Gait variability was the strongest kinematic dimension associated with FOG, with severity accurately identified via a neural network trained on sensor data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-DBS FOG in the best-functional state is largely therapy resistant, partially improved by stimulation and medication. Individual variability in responses to LD and stimulation underscores the need to determine FOG circuit mechanisms, as treatment remains an unmet clinical need.</p>","PeriodicalId":19029,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Effects of Levodopa and Stimulation on Post-Surgery Freezing of Gait in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Clinical and Kinematic Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Raquel Barbosa, Paulo Bastos, Patrícia Pita Lobo, Catarina Correia Rodrigues, Anabela Valadas, Leonor Correia Guedes, Beatriz Mano, Sara Alberto, Vitor Paixão, Mário Miguel Rosa, Ricardo Matias, Daniel Martins, Marcelo Mendonça, Miguel Coelho\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mdc3.70170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The long-term efficacy of high-frequency subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on freezing of gait (FOG) remains unclear. We aimed to study the mechanism and optimal therapeutic approach to long-term post-surgery FOG.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim was to assess the mechanism and optimal therapeutic approach to long-term post-surgery FOG.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventeen Parkinson's disease (PD) STN-DBS patients with a FOG score (item 3.11) ≥2 in the MedON/StimON condition were evaluated under 5 experimental conditions, including a low-frequency (60 Hz) condition maintaining the same total energy delivered. In each condition, gait and FOG episodes (#FOG) were assessed using clinical (eg, a 3 × 14-m Stand-Walk-Sit Test) and kinematic data from inertial measurement units (IMU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to MedOFF/StimOFF, #FOG significantly decreased in the MedON/StimON 130-Hz condition. Either stimulation or levodopa (LD) (MedOFF/StimON or MedON/StimOFF) also significantly reduced #FOG and Stand-Walk-Sit Test (SWS) time compared to MedOFF/StimOFF. No significant difference in #FOG episodes or SWS time was found between 130 and 60 Hz, though 60-Hz stimulation had lower axial scores. Individual responses to LD or stimulation varied: (1) 3 patients improved #FOG with LD but worsened with stimulation, whereas 5 exhibited the reverse; (2) in 9 patients, low-frequency stimulation outperformed high-frequency stimulation in reducing #FOG. Gait variability was the strongest kinematic dimension associated with FOG, with severity accurately identified via a neural network trained on sensor data.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Post-DBS FOG in the best-functional state is largely therapy resistant, partially improved by stimulation and medication. Individual variability in responses to LD and stimulation underscores the need to determine FOG circuit mechanisms, as treatment remains an unmet clinical need.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70170\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mdc3.70170","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高频丘脑底核深部脑刺激(STN-DBS)对冻结步态(FOG)的长期疗效尚不清楚。我们的目的是研究长期术后FOG的机制和最佳治疗方法。目的:探讨术后长期大雾的发生机制及最佳治疗方法。方法:选取17例MedON/StimON状态下FOG评分(第3.11项)≥2的帕金森病STN-DBS患者,在5种实验条件下进行评估,包括维持相同总能量传递的低频(60 Hz)条件。在每种情况下,使用临床(例如,3 × 14米站立-行走-坐姿测试)和惯性测量单元(IMU)的运动学数据评估步态和FOG发作(#FOG)。结果:与MedOFF/StimOFF相比,MedON/ stimoon 130-Hz条件下#FOG显著降低。与MedOFF/StimOFF相比,刺激或左旋多巴(LD) (MedOFF/StimON或MedON/StimOFF)也显著减少#FOG和站-走-坐测试(SWS)时间。在130和60 Hz的刺激中,#FOG发作或SWS时间没有显著差异,尽管60 Hz的刺激具有较低的轴向评分。个体对LD或刺激的反应各不相同:(1)3例患者的#FOG在LD后改善,但在刺激后恶化,而5例患者则相反;(2) 9例患者中,低频刺激降低#FOG的效果优于高频刺激。步态变异性是与FOG相关的最强运动学维度,其严重程度通过传感器数据训练的神经网络准确识别。结论:dbs后功能最佳状态下的FOG主要是治疗抵抗,部分通过刺激和药物治疗得到改善。个体对LD和刺激反应的差异强调了确定FOG回路机制的必要性,因为治疗仍然是一个未满足的临床需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differential Effects of Levodopa and Stimulation on Post-Surgery Freezing of Gait in Subthalamic Nucleus Deep Brain Stimulation Parkinson's Disease Patients: A Clinical and Kinematic Analysis.

Background: The long-term efficacy of high-frequency subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on freezing of gait (FOG) remains unclear. We aimed to study the mechanism and optimal therapeutic approach to long-term post-surgery FOG.

Objective: The aim was to assess the mechanism and optimal therapeutic approach to long-term post-surgery FOG.

Methods: Seventeen Parkinson's disease (PD) STN-DBS patients with a FOG score (item 3.11) ≥2 in the MedON/StimON condition were evaluated under 5 experimental conditions, including a low-frequency (60 Hz) condition maintaining the same total energy delivered. In each condition, gait and FOG episodes (#FOG) were assessed using clinical (eg, a 3 × 14-m Stand-Walk-Sit Test) and kinematic data from inertial measurement units (IMU).

Results: Compared to MedOFF/StimOFF, #FOG significantly decreased in the MedON/StimON 130-Hz condition. Either stimulation or levodopa (LD) (MedOFF/StimON or MedON/StimOFF) also significantly reduced #FOG and Stand-Walk-Sit Test (SWS) time compared to MedOFF/StimOFF. No significant difference in #FOG episodes or SWS time was found between 130 and 60 Hz, though 60-Hz stimulation had lower axial scores. Individual responses to LD or stimulation varied: (1) 3 patients improved #FOG with LD but worsened with stimulation, whereas 5 exhibited the reverse; (2) in 9 patients, low-frequency stimulation outperformed high-frequency stimulation in reducing #FOG. Gait variability was the strongest kinematic dimension associated with FOG, with severity accurately identified via a neural network trained on sensor data.

Conclusion: Post-DBS FOG in the best-functional state is largely therapy resistant, partially improved by stimulation and medication. Individual variability in responses to LD and stimulation underscores the need to determine FOG circuit mechanisms, as treatment remains an unmet clinical need.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
7.50%
发文量
218
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders Clinical Practice- is an online-only journal committed to publishing high quality peer reviewed articles related to clinical aspects of movement disorders which broadly include phenomenology (interesting case/case series/rarities), investigative (for e.g- genetics, imaging), translational (phenotype-genotype or other) and treatment aspects (clinical guidelines, diagnostic and treatment algorithms)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信