Ender Sir, Sena Aydogan, Gul Didem Batur Sir, Alp Eren Celenlioglu
{"title":"机器学习分析识别尾侧硬膜外脉冲射频治疗尾骨痛症的预测因素。","authors":"Ender Sir, Sena Aydogan, Gul Didem Batur Sir, Alp Eren Celenlioglu","doi":"10.2147/JPR.S521331","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to use machine learning (ML) to explore predictive parameters related to the efficacy of caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency (CEPRF) treatment for coccygodynia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five different ML methods were used to predict treatment success at 6 months after CEPRF. The findings generated by these algorithms are compared with respect to the accuracy of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptom duration, angular deformation and NRS at admission are the most significant factors impacting therapy success in coccygodynia patients. Success rates are obtained for relatively short symptom durations to be 71.83%, for longer periods to be 16.67%; for short durations together with no angular deformity to be 79.55%, with angular deformity to be 59.26%; and for NRS level at admission less than 8 together with angular deformity to be 91.67%, with no angular deformity to be 33.33%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research reveals the potential of ML methods to improve treatment outcome prediction in coccygodynia. When a new patient is admitted, the ML-generated decision trees provide a quick and precise assessment of the possible success rate of CEPRF treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":16661,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pain Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"2839-2848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12154530/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine Learning Analysis to Identify Predictive Factors of Caudal Epidural Pulse Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Coccygodynia.\",\"authors\":\"Ender Sir, Sena Aydogan, Gul Didem Batur Sir, Alp Eren Celenlioglu\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/JPR.S521331\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aims to use machine learning (ML) to explore predictive parameters related to the efficacy of caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency (CEPRF) treatment for coccygodynia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five different ML methods were used to predict treatment success at 6 months after CEPRF. The findings generated by these algorithms are compared with respect to the accuracy of the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptom duration, angular deformation and NRS at admission are the most significant factors impacting therapy success in coccygodynia patients. Success rates are obtained for relatively short symptom durations to be 71.83%, for longer periods to be 16.67%; for short durations together with no angular deformity to be 79.55%, with angular deformity to be 59.26%; and for NRS level at admission less than 8 together with angular deformity to be 91.67%, with no angular deformity to be 33.33%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This research reveals the potential of ML methods to improve treatment outcome prediction in coccygodynia. When a new patient is admitted, the ML-generated decision trees provide a quick and precise assessment of the possible success rate of CEPRF treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"2839-2848\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12154530/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pain Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S521331\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S521331","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Machine Learning Analysis to Identify Predictive Factors of Caudal Epidural Pulse Radiofrequency in the Treatment of Coccygodynia.
Background: This study aims to use machine learning (ML) to explore predictive parameters related to the efficacy of caudal epidural pulsed radiofrequency (CEPRF) treatment for coccygodynia.
Methods: Five different ML methods were used to predict treatment success at 6 months after CEPRF. The findings generated by these algorithms are compared with respect to the accuracy of the results.
Results: Symptom duration, angular deformation and NRS at admission are the most significant factors impacting therapy success in coccygodynia patients. Success rates are obtained for relatively short symptom durations to be 71.83%, for longer periods to be 16.67%; for short durations together with no angular deformity to be 79.55%, with angular deformity to be 59.26%; and for NRS level at admission less than 8 together with angular deformity to be 91.67%, with no angular deformity to be 33.33%.
Conclusion: This research reveals the potential of ML methods to improve treatment outcome prediction in coccygodynia. When a new patient is admitted, the ML-generated decision trees provide a quick and precise assessment of the possible success rate of CEPRF treatment.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Pain Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that welcomes laboratory and clinical findings in the fields of pain research and the prevention and management of pain. Original research, reviews, symposium reports, hypothesis formation and commentaries are all considered for publication. Additionally, the journal now welcomes the submission of pain-policy-related editorials and commentaries, particularly in regard to ethical, regulatory, forensic, and other legal issues in pain medicine, and to the education of pain practitioners and researchers.