Maria Alice Franzoi, Carlota Santolaya, Elise Martin, Leonor Fasse, Pascal Rouby, Marie Sophie Minot-This, Antonio Di Meglio, Ines Vaz-Luis
{"title":"“让我们谈谈风险”:共同设计一个途径来评估、沟通和采取行动,以应对乳腺癌后长期毒性的个人风险。","authors":"Maria Alice Franzoi, Carlota Santolaya, Elise Martin, Leonor Fasse, Pascal Rouby, Marie Sophie Minot-This, Antonio Di Meglio, Ines Vaz-Luis","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Survivors of breast cancer (BC) may endure significant and persistent post-treatment burdens that negatively impact overall quality of life. We previously developed risk prediction algorithms to identify individual patient profiles at increased risk for long-term toxicities. To prepare for the implementation of these risk algorithms in routine care, we performed a study to assess preferences, catalysts, and barriers concerning communication of individual risk of long-term BC toxicities. The goal was to co-design a pathway for risk assessment, communication, and management starting at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A co-design study was performed using a participatory research framework and qualitative methods. Two phases of focus groups (FG) were conducted to assess the perspective of patients and providers through an iterative process of Exploration, Consultation, Prioritization, Integration and Co-design. Discussions were guided by four main questions: Who should communicate the risk? When should the risk be communicated? How should the risk be communicated? What information should be communicated, and care proposed?. FG discussions were recorded, pseudo-anonymized, transcribed and evaluated through a thematic content analysis. Results were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six FG were conducted between July 2022 and August 2023, with a total of 28 participants (8 patients and 20 providers). Results revealed a strong willingness to discuss the risk of long-term toxicities, particularly for patients who would present with a higher risk of toxicities. However, this willingness was contingent on the implementation of supportive care pathways that offer personalized communication strategies and risk mitigation approaches tailored to each patient's need.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that both patients and providers are interested in, and willing to engage in, the assessment, communication and mitigation of long-term toxicities from the time of diagnosis. To address this need in routine care, a tailored pathway was co-designed and will undergo formal testing in a hybrid Type 3 effectiveness/implementation clinical trial (NCT06479057).</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This study assessed the needs, preferences and expectations of patients and providers for implementing a care pathway to assess, communicate and mitigate the risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer treatment using risk prediction algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Let's talk about risk\\\": co-designing a pathway to assess, communicate and act on individual risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alice Franzoi, Carlota Santolaya, Elise Martin, Leonor Fasse, Pascal Rouby, Marie Sophie Minot-This, Antonio Di Meglio, Ines Vaz-Luis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Survivors of breast cancer (BC) may endure significant and persistent post-treatment burdens that negatively impact overall quality of life. We previously developed risk prediction algorithms to identify individual patient profiles at increased risk for long-term toxicities. To prepare for the implementation of these risk algorithms in routine care, we performed a study to assess preferences, catalysts, and barriers concerning communication of individual risk of long-term BC toxicities. The goal was to co-design a pathway for risk assessment, communication, and management starting at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A co-design study was performed using a participatory research framework and qualitative methods. Two phases of focus groups (FG) were conducted to assess the perspective of patients and providers through an iterative process of Exploration, Consultation, Prioritization, Integration and Co-design. Discussions were guided by four main questions: Who should communicate the risk? When should the risk be communicated? How should the risk be communicated? What information should be communicated, and care proposed?. FG discussions were recorded, pseudo-anonymized, transcribed and evaluated through a thematic content analysis. Results were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six FG were conducted between July 2022 and August 2023, with a total of 28 participants (8 patients and 20 providers). Results revealed a strong willingness to discuss the risk of long-term toxicities, particularly for patients who would present with a higher risk of toxicities. However, this willingness was contingent on the implementation of supportive care pathways that offer personalized communication strategies and risk mitigation approaches tailored to each patient's need.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that both patients and providers are interested in, and willing to engage in, the assessment, communication and mitigation of long-term toxicities from the time of diagnosis. To address this need in routine care, a tailored pathway was co-designed and will undergo formal testing in a hybrid Type 3 effectiveness/implementation clinical trial (NCT06479057).</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This study assessed the needs, preferences and expectations of patients and providers for implementing a care pathway to assess, communicate and mitigate the risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer treatment using risk prediction algorithms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Let's talk about risk": co-designing a pathway to assess, communicate and act on individual risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer.
Purpose: Survivors of breast cancer (BC) may endure significant and persistent post-treatment burdens that negatively impact overall quality of life. We previously developed risk prediction algorithms to identify individual patient profiles at increased risk for long-term toxicities. To prepare for the implementation of these risk algorithms in routine care, we performed a study to assess preferences, catalysts, and barriers concerning communication of individual risk of long-term BC toxicities. The goal was to co-design a pathway for risk assessment, communication, and management starting at diagnosis.
Methods: A co-design study was performed using a participatory research framework and qualitative methods. Two phases of focus groups (FG) were conducted to assess the perspective of patients and providers through an iterative process of Exploration, Consultation, Prioritization, Integration and Co-design. Discussions were guided by four main questions: Who should communicate the risk? When should the risk be communicated? How should the risk be communicated? What information should be communicated, and care proposed?. FG discussions were recorded, pseudo-anonymized, transcribed and evaluated through a thematic content analysis. Results were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).
Results: Six FG were conducted between July 2022 and August 2023, with a total of 28 participants (8 patients and 20 providers). Results revealed a strong willingness to discuss the risk of long-term toxicities, particularly for patients who would present with a higher risk of toxicities. However, this willingness was contingent on the implementation of supportive care pathways that offer personalized communication strategies and risk mitigation approaches tailored to each patient's need.
Conclusions: This study found that both patients and providers are interested in, and willing to engage in, the assessment, communication and mitigation of long-term toxicities from the time of diagnosis. To address this need in routine care, a tailored pathway was co-designed and will undergo formal testing in a hybrid Type 3 effectiveness/implementation clinical trial (NCT06479057).
Implications for cancer survivors: This study assessed the needs, preferences and expectations of patients and providers for implementing a care pathway to assess, communicate and mitigate the risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer treatment using risk prediction algorithms.
期刊介绍:
Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.