“让我们谈谈风险”:共同设计一个途径来评估、沟通和采取行动,以应对乳腺癌后长期毒性的个人风险。

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Maria Alice Franzoi, Carlota Santolaya, Elise Martin, Leonor Fasse, Pascal Rouby, Marie Sophie Minot-This, Antonio Di Meglio, Ines Vaz-Luis
{"title":"“让我们谈谈风险”:共同设计一个途径来评估、沟通和采取行动,以应对乳腺癌后长期毒性的个人风险。","authors":"Maria Alice Franzoi, Carlota Santolaya, Elise Martin, Leonor Fasse, Pascal Rouby, Marie Sophie Minot-This, Antonio Di Meglio, Ines Vaz-Luis","doi":"10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Survivors of breast cancer (BC) may endure significant and persistent post-treatment burdens that negatively impact overall quality of life. We previously developed risk prediction algorithms to identify individual patient profiles at increased risk for long-term toxicities. To prepare for the implementation of these risk algorithms in routine care, we performed a study to assess preferences, catalysts, and barriers concerning communication of individual risk of long-term BC toxicities. The goal was to co-design a pathway for risk assessment, communication, and management starting at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A co-design study was performed using a participatory research framework and qualitative methods. Two phases of focus groups (FG) were conducted to assess the perspective of patients and providers through an iterative process of Exploration, Consultation, Prioritization, Integration and Co-design. Discussions were guided by four main questions: Who should communicate the risk? When should the risk be communicated? How should the risk be communicated? What information should be communicated, and care proposed?. FG discussions were recorded, pseudo-anonymized, transcribed and evaluated through a thematic content analysis. Results were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six FG were conducted between July 2022 and August 2023, with a total of 28 participants (8 patients and 20 providers). Results revealed a strong willingness to discuss the risk of long-term toxicities, particularly for patients who would present with a higher risk of toxicities. However, this willingness was contingent on the implementation of supportive care pathways that offer personalized communication strategies and risk mitigation approaches tailored to each patient's need.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that both patients and providers are interested in, and willing to engage in, the assessment, communication and mitigation of long-term toxicities from the time of diagnosis. To address this need in routine care, a tailored pathway was co-designed and will undergo formal testing in a hybrid Type 3 effectiveness/implementation clinical trial (NCT06479057).</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This study assessed the needs, preferences and expectations of patients and providers for implementing a care pathway to assess, communicate and mitigate the risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer treatment using risk prediction algorithms.</p>","PeriodicalId":15284,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Let's talk about risk\\\": co-designing a pathway to assess, communicate and act on individual risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Maria Alice Franzoi, Carlota Santolaya, Elise Martin, Leonor Fasse, Pascal Rouby, Marie Sophie Minot-This, Antonio Di Meglio, Ines Vaz-Luis\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Survivors of breast cancer (BC) may endure significant and persistent post-treatment burdens that negatively impact overall quality of life. We previously developed risk prediction algorithms to identify individual patient profiles at increased risk for long-term toxicities. To prepare for the implementation of these risk algorithms in routine care, we performed a study to assess preferences, catalysts, and barriers concerning communication of individual risk of long-term BC toxicities. The goal was to co-design a pathway for risk assessment, communication, and management starting at diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A co-design study was performed using a participatory research framework and qualitative methods. Two phases of focus groups (FG) were conducted to assess the perspective of patients and providers through an iterative process of Exploration, Consultation, Prioritization, Integration and Co-design. Discussions were guided by four main questions: Who should communicate the risk? When should the risk be communicated? How should the risk be communicated? What information should be communicated, and care proposed?. FG discussions were recorded, pseudo-anonymized, transcribed and evaluated through a thematic content analysis. Results were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six FG were conducted between July 2022 and August 2023, with a total of 28 participants (8 patients and 20 providers). Results revealed a strong willingness to discuss the risk of long-term toxicities, particularly for patients who would present with a higher risk of toxicities. However, this willingness was contingent on the implementation of supportive care pathways that offer personalized communication strategies and risk mitigation approaches tailored to each patient's need.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study found that both patients and providers are interested in, and willing to engage in, the assessment, communication and mitigation of long-term toxicities from the time of diagnosis. To address this need in routine care, a tailored pathway was co-designed and will undergo formal testing in a hybrid Type 3 effectiveness/implementation clinical trial (NCT06479057).</p><p><strong>Implications for cancer survivors: </strong>This study assessed the needs, preferences and expectations of patients and providers for implementing a care pathway to assess, communicate and mitigate the risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer treatment using risk prediction algorithms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15284,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Survivorship\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Survivorship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-025-01826-0","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:乳腺癌(BC)的幸存者可能承受显著和持续的治疗后负担,对整体生活质量产生负面影响。我们之前开发了风险预测算法来识别长期毒性风险增加的个体患者概况。为了准备在常规护理中实施这些风险算法,我们进行了一项研究,以评估长期BC毒性个体风险沟通的偏好、催化剂和障碍。目的是共同设计一种从诊断开始的风险评估、沟通和管理途径。方法:采用参与式研究框架和定性方法进行共同设计研究。进行了两个阶段的焦点小组(FG),通过探索、咨询、优先排序、整合和共同设计的迭代过程来评估患者和提供者的观点。讨论以四个主要问题为指导:谁应该传达风险?什么时候应该对风险进行沟通?风险应该如何传达?应传达哪些信息,并提出哪些建议?FG讨论被记录、伪匿名化、转录并通过主题内容分析进行评估。结果报告遵循定性研究报告的综合标准(COREQ)。结果:在2022年7月至2023年8月期间进行了6次FG,共有28名参与者(8名患者和20名提供者)。结果显示,人们非常愿意讨论长期毒性的风险,特别是对于那些出现较高毒性风险的患者。然而,这种意愿取决于支持性护理途径的实施,提供个性化的沟通策略和针对每个患者需求的风险缓解方法。结论:本研究发现,从诊断开始,患者和医护人员都对长期毒性的评估、沟通和缓解感兴趣,并愿意参与其中。为了满足常规护理中的这一需求,我们共同设计了一种量身定制的途径,并将在混合型3有效性/实施临床试验(NCT06479057)中进行正式测试。对癌症幸存者的影响:本研究评估了患者和提供者实施护理途径的需求、偏好和期望,以评估、沟通和减轻乳腺癌治疗后使用风险预测算法的长期毒性风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Let's talk about risk": co-designing a pathway to assess, communicate and act on individual risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer.

Purpose: Survivors of breast cancer (BC) may endure significant and persistent post-treatment burdens that negatively impact overall quality of life. We previously developed risk prediction algorithms to identify individual patient profiles at increased risk for long-term toxicities. To prepare for the implementation of these risk algorithms in routine care, we performed a study to assess preferences, catalysts, and barriers concerning communication of individual risk of long-term BC toxicities. The goal was to co-design a pathway for risk assessment, communication, and management starting at diagnosis.

Methods: A co-design study was performed using a participatory research framework and qualitative methods. Two phases of focus groups (FG) were conducted to assess the perspective of patients and providers through an iterative process of Exploration, Consultation, Prioritization, Integration and Co-design. Discussions were guided by four main questions: Who should communicate the risk? When should the risk be communicated? How should the risk be communicated? What information should be communicated, and care proposed?. FG discussions were recorded, pseudo-anonymized, transcribed and evaluated through a thematic content analysis. Results were reported following the consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ).

Results: Six FG were conducted between July 2022 and August 2023, with a total of 28 participants (8 patients and 20 providers). Results revealed a strong willingness to discuss the risk of long-term toxicities, particularly for patients who would present with a higher risk of toxicities. However, this willingness was contingent on the implementation of supportive care pathways that offer personalized communication strategies and risk mitigation approaches tailored to each patient's need.

Conclusions: This study found that both patients and providers are interested in, and willing to engage in, the assessment, communication and mitigation of long-term toxicities from the time of diagnosis. To address this need in routine care, a tailored pathway was co-designed and will undergo formal testing in a hybrid Type 3 effectiveness/implementation clinical trial (NCT06479057).

Implications for cancer survivors: This study assessed the needs, preferences and expectations of patients and providers for implementing a care pathway to assess, communicate and mitigate the risk of long-term toxicities after breast cancer treatment using risk prediction algorithms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
10.80%
发文量
149
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer survivorship is a worldwide concern. The aim of this multidisciplinary journal is to provide a global forum for new knowledge related to cancer survivorship. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers relevant to improving the understanding, prevention, and management of the multiple areas related to cancer survivorship that can affect quality of care, access to care, longevity, and quality of life. It is a forum for research on humans (both laboratory and clinical), clinical studies, systematic and meta-analytic literature reviews, policy studies, and in rare situations case studies as long as they provide a new observation that should be followed up on to improve outcomes related to cancer survivors. Published articles represent a broad range of fields including oncology, primary care, physical medicine and rehabilitation, many other medical and nursing specialties, nursing, health services research, physical and occupational therapy, public health, behavioral medicine, psychology, social work, evidence-based policy, health economics, biobehavioral mechanisms, and qualitative analyses. The journal focuses exclusively on adult cancer survivors, young adult cancer survivors, and childhood cancer survivors who are young adults. Submissions must target those diagnosed with and treated for cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信