一个团队:确定院前提供者对烧伤患者外展和教育的需求。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Ronnie Adams, Stephen Elmgren, Yuk Ming Liu, Laura Johnson, Lauren Nosanov
{"title":"一个团队:确定院前提供者对烧伤患者外展和教育的需求。","authors":"Ronnie Adams, Stephen Elmgren, Yuk Ming Liu, Laura Johnson, Lauren Nosanov","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burns are among the most common traumatic injuries and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, many prehospital providers remain unfamiliar with current management algorithms. Proper resuscitation is crucial to clinical outcomes, but care guidelines vary widely. We sought to characterize and evaluate the burn care provided by emergency medical service agencies in our metropolitan region to identify opportunities for improvement and education. Surveys were distributed to prehospital professionals, and emergency medical services clinical protocols were obtained for qualitative analysis. Survey design and analysis were conducted with Qualtrics. The 38 survey responses were from providers representing 19 emergency medical service agencies; 8 protocols were obtained and analyzed. Respondents were primarily paramedics (61%), and 34 (89.5%) had renewed their license in the past two years. Notably, 35/38 (92.1%) reported transporting five or fewer burn patients within the past year, and 28/35 (80.0%) stated they were not comfortable establishing vascular access through a burn wound. Continuing education was most commonly obtained through formal courses (65.7%), podcasts (42.1%), and departmental training (34.2%). Qualitative review of the protocols revealed varied formulas for fluid resuscitation. Approved pain medications included morphine, ketamine, and fentanyl; two agencies mentioned hydroxocobalamin in their protocol. Thermoregulation measures were mentioned in three protocols. Prehospital providers lack high-volume exposure to this patient population and exhibit low comfort levels. Minimal information on burns is included in regular continuing education. Practices differ between emergency medical service agencies, even though the quality of prehospital care has a sizeable impact on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Team: Identifying Prehospital Provider Needs for Burn Patient Outreach and Education.\",\"authors\":\"Ronnie Adams, Stephen Elmgren, Yuk Ming Liu, Laura Johnson, Lauren Nosanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burns are among the most common traumatic injuries and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, many prehospital providers remain unfamiliar with current management algorithms. Proper resuscitation is crucial to clinical outcomes, but care guidelines vary widely. We sought to characterize and evaluate the burn care provided by emergency medical service agencies in our metropolitan region to identify opportunities for improvement and education. Surveys were distributed to prehospital professionals, and emergency medical services clinical protocols were obtained for qualitative analysis. Survey design and analysis were conducted with Qualtrics. The 38 survey responses were from providers representing 19 emergency medical service agencies; 8 protocols were obtained and analyzed. Respondents were primarily paramedics (61%), and 34 (89.5%) had renewed their license in the past two years. Notably, 35/38 (92.1%) reported transporting five or fewer burn patients within the past year, and 28/35 (80.0%) stated they were not comfortable establishing vascular access through a burn wound. Continuing education was most commonly obtained through formal courses (65.7%), podcasts (42.1%), and departmental training (34.2%). Qualitative review of the protocols revealed varied formulas for fluid resuscitation. Approved pain medications included morphine, ketamine, and fentanyl; two agencies mentioned hydroxocobalamin in their protocol. Thermoregulation measures were mentioned in three protocols. Prehospital providers lack high-volume exposure to this patient population and exhibit low comfort levels. Minimal information on burns is included in regular continuing education. Practices differ between emergency medical service agencies, even though the quality of prehospital care has a sizeable impact on outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

烧伤是最常见的创伤性损伤之一,与显著的发病率和死亡率相关;然而,许多院前提供者仍然不熟悉当前的管理算法。正确的复苏对临床结果至关重要,但护理指南差异很大。我们试图描述和评估我们大都市区紧急医疗服务机构提供的烧伤护理,以确定改进和教育的机会。向院前专业人员分发调查问卷,并获得急诊医疗服务临床方案进行定性分析。采用qualics进行调查设计和分析。38份调查回复来自19家紧急医疗服务机构的提供者;获得并分析了8个方案。受访者主要是护理人员(61%),34人(89.5%)在过去两年内更新了他们的执照。值得注意的是,35/38(92.1%)报告在过去一年内运送了5名或更少的烧伤患者,28/35(80.0%)表示他们不愿意通过烧伤创面建立血管通道。继续教育最常通过正规课程(65.7%)、播客(42.1%)和部门培训(34.2%)获得。对方案的定性回顾揭示了液体复苏的不同公式。批准的止痛药包括吗啡、氯胺酮和芬太尼;两家机构在他们的方案中提到了羟钴胺素。三个方案中提到了体温调节措施。院前服务提供者缺乏对这一患者群体的大量接触,并且表现出较低的舒适度。在常规的继续教育中,关于烧伤的信息很少。尽管院前护理的质量对结果有相当大的影响,但急诊医疗服务机构之间的做法有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
One Team: Identifying Prehospital Provider Needs for Burn Patient Outreach and Education.

Burns are among the most common traumatic injuries and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, many prehospital providers remain unfamiliar with current management algorithms. Proper resuscitation is crucial to clinical outcomes, but care guidelines vary widely. We sought to characterize and evaluate the burn care provided by emergency medical service agencies in our metropolitan region to identify opportunities for improvement and education. Surveys were distributed to prehospital professionals, and emergency medical services clinical protocols were obtained for qualitative analysis. Survey design and analysis were conducted with Qualtrics. The 38 survey responses were from providers representing 19 emergency medical service agencies; 8 protocols were obtained and analyzed. Respondents were primarily paramedics (61%), and 34 (89.5%) had renewed their license in the past two years. Notably, 35/38 (92.1%) reported transporting five or fewer burn patients within the past year, and 28/35 (80.0%) stated they were not comfortable establishing vascular access through a burn wound. Continuing education was most commonly obtained through formal courses (65.7%), podcasts (42.1%), and departmental training (34.2%). Qualitative review of the protocols revealed varied formulas for fluid resuscitation. Approved pain medications included morphine, ketamine, and fentanyl; two agencies mentioned hydroxocobalamin in their protocol. Thermoregulation measures were mentioned in three protocols. Prehospital providers lack high-volume exposure to this patient population and exhibit low comfort levels. Minimal information on burns is included in regular continuing education. Practices differ between emergency medical service agencies, even though the quality of prehospital care has a sizeable impact on outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
535
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信