Ronnie Adams, Stephen Elmgren, Yuk Ming Liu, Laura Johnson, Lauren Nosanov
{"title":"一个团队:确定院前提供者对烧伤患者外展和教育的需求。","authors":"Ronnie Adams, Stephen Elmgren, Yuk Ming Liu, Laura Johnson, Lauren Nosanov","doi":"10.1093/jbcr/iraf110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Burns are among the most common traumatic injuries and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, many prehospital providers remain unfamiliar with current management algorithms. Proper resuscitation is crucial to clinical outcomes, but care guidelines vary widely. We sought to characterize and evaluate the burn care provided by emergency medical service agencies in our metropolitan region to identify opportunities for improvement and education. Surveys were distributed to prehospital professionals, and emergency medical services clinical protocols were obtained for qualitative analysis. Survey design and analysis were conducted with Qualtrics. The 38 survey responses were from providers representing 19 emergency medical service agencies; 8 protocols were obtained and analyzed. Respondents were primarily paramedics (61%), and 34 (89.5%) had renewed their license in the past two years. Notably, 35/38 (92.1%) reported transporting five or fewer burn patients within the past year, and 28/35 (80.0%) stated they were not comfortable establishing vascular access through a burn wound. Continuing education was most commonly obtained through formal courses (65.7%), podcasts (42.1%), and departmental training (34.2%). Qualitative review of the protocols revealed varied formulas for fluid resuscitation. Approved pain medications included morphine, ketamine, and fentanyl; two agencies mentioned hydroxocobalamin in their protocol. Thermoregulation measures were mentioned in three protocols. Prehospital providers lack high-volume exposure to this patient population and exhibit low comfort levels. Minimal information on burns is included in regular continuing education. Practices differ between emergency medical service agencies, even though the quality of prehospital care has a sizeable impact on outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15205,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One Team: Identifying Prehospital Provider Needs for Burn Patient Outreach and Education.\",\"authors\":\"Ronnie Adams, Stephen Elmgren, Yuk Ming Liu, Laura Johnson, Lauren Nosanov\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jbcr/iraf110\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Burns are among the most common traumatic injuries and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, many prehospital providers remain unfamiliar with current management algorithms. Proper resuscitation is crucial to clinical outcomes, but care guidelines vary widely. We sought to characterize and evaluate the burn care provided by emergency medical service agencies in our metropolitan region to identify opportunities for improvement and education. Surveys were distributed to prehospital professionals, and emergency medical services clinical protocols were obtained for qualitative analysis. Survey design and analysis were conducted with Qualtrics. The 38 survey responses were from providers representing 19 emergency medical service agencies; 8 protocols were obtained and analyzed. Respondents were primarily paramedics (61%), and 34 (89.5%) had renewed their license in the past two years. Notably, 35/38 (92.1%) reported transporting five or fewer burn patients within the past year, and 28/35 (80.0%) stated they were not comfortable establishing vascular access through a burn wound. Continuing education was most commonly obtained through formal courses (65.7%), podcasts (42.1%), and departmental training (34.2%). Qualitative review of the protocols revealed varied formulas for fluid resuscitation. Approved pain medications included morphine, ketamine, and fentanyl; two agencies mentioned hydroxocobalamin in their protocol. Thermoregulation measures were mentioned in three protocols. Prehospital providers lack high-volume exposure to this patient population and exhibit low comfort levels. Minimal information on burns is included in regular continuing education. Practices differ between emergency medical service agencies, even though the quality of prehospital care has a sizeable impact on outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15205,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Burn Care & Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf110\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Burn Care & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jbcr/iraf110","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
One Team: Identifying Prehospital Provider Needs for Burn Patient Outreach and Education.
Burns are among the most common traumatic injuries and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality; however, many prehospital providers remain unfamiliar with current management algorithms. Proper resuscitation is crucial to clinical outcomes, but care guidelines vary widely. We sought to characterize and evaluate the burn care provided by emergency medical service agencies in our metropolitan region to identify opportunities for improvement and education. Surveys were distributed to prehospital professionals, and emergency medical services clinical protocols were obtained for qualitative analysis. Survey design and analysis were conducted with Qualtrics. The 38 survey responses were from providers representing 19 emergency medical service agencies; 8 protocols were obtained and analyzed. Respondents were primarily paramedics (61%), and 34 (89.5%) had renewed their license in the past two years. Notably, 35/38 (92.1%) reported transporting five or fewer burn patients within the past year, and 28/35 (80.0%) stated they were not comfortable establishing vascular access through a burn wound. Continuing education was most commonly obtained through formal courses (65.7%), podcasts (42.1%), and departmental training (34.2%). Qualitative review of the protocols revealed varied formulas for fluid resuscitation. Approved pain medications included morphine, ketamine, and fentanyl; two agencies mentioned hydroxocobalamin in their protocol. Thermoregulation measures were mentioned in three protocols. Prehospital providers lack high-volume exposure to this patient population and exhibit low comfort levels. Minimal information on burns is included in regular continuing education. Practices differ between emergency medical service agencies, even though the quality of prehospital care has a sizeable impact on outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Burn Care & Research provides the latest information on advances in burn prevention, research, education, delivery of acute care, and research to all members of the burn care team. As the official publication of the American Burn Association, this is the only U.S. journal devoted exclusively to the treatment and research of patients with burns. Original, peer-reviewed articles present the latest information on surgical procedures, acute care, reconstruction, burn prevention, and research and education. Other topics include physical therapy/occupational therapy, nutrition, current events in the evolving healthcare debate, and reports on the newest computer software for diagnostics and treatment. The Journal serves all burn care specialists, from physicians, nurses, and physical and occupational therapists to psychologists, counselors, and researchers.