区域神经阻滞联合全身麻醉对肘关节松解手术患者认知功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 12.5 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Fang Xie, Ai-Hua Qi, Fan Pan, Ying Zhang, Ning Gan, Xiao-Tao Xu, Ai-Zhong Wang, Nan-Nan Zhang
{"title":"区域神经阻滞联合全身麻醉对肘关节松解手术患者认知功能的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Fang Xie, Ai-Hua Qi, Fan Pan, Ying Zhang, Ning Gan, Xiao-Tao Xu, Ai-Zhong Wang, Nan-Nan Zhang","doi":"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Regional nerve block, as an anesthetic technique, can enhance postoperative recovery for patients. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remains a critical concern for patients undergoing elbow joint release surgery. This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether combining regional nerve block (RNB) with general anesthesia (GA) improves cognitive outcomes compared to GA alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center and single-blind (outcome assessors and analysts blinded) observation study. Seventy-four patients (ASA I-II, aged 18-65 years, BMI < 26 kg/m2) undergoing elbow joint release surgery were randomly assigned to either a control group (GA alone) or an observation group (Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: 20 mL 0.375% ropivacaine + GA). Primary outcome was MMSE scores on Pre-op D 1 (preoperative day 1), POD 1 (postoperative day 1), and POD 3 (postoperative day 3). Secondary outcomes included awakening time, extubation time, VAS scores at 1, 6, 12 hours after extubation and hemodynamic parameters at different time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MMSE scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group both on the POD 1 (23.06 ± 1.01 vs 20.50 ± 0.51, mean difference 2.56 [95% CI 2.18 to 2.93]; P < 0.001) and POD 3 (25.56 ± 0.51 vs 23.36 ± 0.49, mean difference 2.19 [95% CI 1.96 to 2.43]; P < 0.001). The postoperative awakening time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 11.83 ± 1.00 min, mean difference -8.33 [95% CI -8.71 to -7.95]; p < 0.001) and extubation time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 13.08 ± 0.84 min, mean difference -9.58 [95% CI -9.92 to -9.25]; p < 0.001) in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group. Furthermore, Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1 hour (1.28 ± 0.61 vs 4.92 ± 0.77, mean difference -3.64 [95% CI -3.97 to -3.31]; p < 0.001), 6 hours (1.36 ± 0.54 vs 5.67 ± 0.68, mean difference -4.31 [95% CI -4.59 to -4.02]; p < 0.001), and 12 hours post-extubation(3.44 ± 0.50 vs 7.67 ± 0.48, mean difference -4.22 [95% CI -4.45 to -3.99]; p < 0.001). Hemodynamic stability was superior in the observation group across perioperative phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining RNB with GA preserves postoperative cognitive function, accelerates recovery, and enhances analgesia in elbow joint release surgery. These findings support RNB as an adjunct to GA to mitigate POCD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14401,"journal":{"name":"International journal of surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":12.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of combining regional nerve block with general anesthesia on cognitive function in patients undergoing elbow joint release surgery: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Fang Xie, Ai-Hua Qi, Fan Pan, Ying Zhang, Ning Gan, Xiao-Tao Xu, Ai-Zhong Wang, Nan-Nan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JS9.0000000000002717\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>Regional nerve block, as an anesthetic technique, can enhance postoperative recovery for patients. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remains a critical concern for patients undergoing elbow joint release surgery. This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether combining regional nerve block (RNB) with general anesthesia (GA) improves cognitive outcomes compared to GA alone.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A single-center and single-blind (outcome assessors and analysts blinded) observation study. Seventy-four patients (ASA I-II, aged 18-65 years, BMI < 26 kg/m2) undergoing elbow joint release surgery were randomly assigned to either a control group (GA alone) or an observation group (Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: 20 mL 0.375% ropivacaine + GA). Primary outcome was MMSE scores on Pre-op D 1 (preoperative day 1), POD 1 (postoperative day 1), and POD 3 (postoperative day 3). Secondary outcomes included awakening time, extubation time, VAS scores at 1, 6, 12 hours after extubation and hemodynamic parameters at different time points.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MMSE scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group both on the POD 1 (23.06 ± 1.01 vs 20.50 ± 0.51, mean difference 2.56 [95% CI 2.18 to 2.93]; P < 0.001) and POD 3 (25.56 ± 0.51 vs 23.36 ± 0.49, mean difference 2.19 [95% CI 1.96 to 2.43]; P < 0.001). The postoperative awakening time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 11.83 ± 1.00 min, mean difference -8.33 [95% CI -8.71 to -7.95]; p < 0.001) and extubation time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 13.08 ± 0.84 min, mean difference -9.58 [95% CI -9.92 to -9.25]; p < 0.001) in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group. Furthermore, Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1 hour (1.28 ± 0.61 vs 4.92 ± 0.77, mean difference -3.64 [95% CI -3.97 to -3.31]; p < 0.001), 6 hours (1.36 ± 0.54 vs 5.67 ± 0.68, mean difference -4.31 [95% CI -4.59 to -4.02]; p < 0.001), and 12 hours post-extubation(3.44 ± 0.50 vs 7.67 ± 0.48, mean difference -4.22 [95% CI -4.45 to -3.99]; p < 0.001). Hemodynamic stability was superior in the observation group across perioperative phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combining RNB with GA preserves postoperative cognitive function, accelerates recovery, and enhances analgesia in elbow joint release surgery. These findings support RNB as an adjunct to GA to mitigate POCD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14401,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002717\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JS9.0000000000002717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的:局部神经阻滞作为一种麻醉技术,可以促进患者术后恢复。术后认知功能障碍(POCD)仍然是接受肘关节松解手术患者的一个关键问题。本随机对照试验评估区域神经阻滞(RNB)与全身麻醉(GA)相结合是否能改善认知结果。方法:采用单中心单盲(结局评估者和分析者双盲)观察研究。74例接受肘关节释放手术的患者(ASA I-II,年龄18-65岁,BMI < 26 kg/m2)随机分为对照组(单独GA)和观察组(超声引导下臂丛阻滞:0.375%罗哌卡因+ GA 20 mL)。主要终点是术前d1(术前第1天)、POD 1(术后第1天)和POD 3(术后第3天)的MMSE评分。次要结局包括苏醒时间、拔管时间、拔管后1、6、12小时VAS评分及不同时间点血流动力学参数。结果:观察组患者在POD 1上的MMSE评分均显著高于对照组(23.06±1.01 vs 20.50±0.51,平均差异2.56 [95% CI 2.18 ~ 2.93];P < 0.001)和POD 3(25.56±0.51 vs 23.36±0.49,平均差2.19 [95% CI 1.96 ~ 2.43];P < 0.001)。术后苏醒时间(3.50±0.56 vs 11.83±1.00 min),平均差为-8.33 [95% CI -8.71 ~ -7.95];p < 0.001)和拔管时间(3.50±0.56 vs 13.08±0.84 min,平均差为-9.58 [95% CI -9.92 ~ -9.25];P < 0.001),显著短于对照组。观察组1 h视觉模拟评分(VAS)低于对照组(1.28±0.61 vs 4.92±0.77,平均差值-3.64 [95% CI -3.97 ~ -3.31];p < 0.001), 6小时(1.36±0.54 vs 5.67±0.68,平均差异-4.31 [95% CI -4.59 ~ -4.02];p < 0.001),拔管后12小时(3.44±0.50 vs 7.67±0.48,平均差为-4.22 [95% CI -4.45 ~ -3.99];P < 0.001)。观察组围手术期血流动力学稳定性优于对照组。结论:RNB联合GA可保护肘关节松解术患者术后认知功能,加速康复,增强镇痛效果。这些发现支持RNB作为GA的辅助药物来减轻POCD。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of combining regional nerve block with general anesthesia on cognitive function in patients undergoing elbow joint release surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

Background and aim: Regional nerve block, as an anesthetic technique, can enhance postoperative recovery for patients. Postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) remains a critical concern for patients undergoing elbow joint release surgery. This randomized controlled trial evaluated whether combining regional nerve block (RNB) with general anesthesia (GA) improves cognitive outcomes compared to GA alone.

Methods: A single-center and single-blind (outcome assessors and analysts blinded) observation study. Seventy-four patients (ASA I-II, aged 18-65 years, BMI < 26 kg/m2) undergoing elbow joint release surgery were randomly assigned to either a control group (GA alone) or an observation group (Ultrasound-guided brachial plexus block: 20 mL 0.375% ropivacaine + GA). Primary outcome was MMSE scores on Pre-op D 1 (preoperative day 1), POD 1 (postoperative day 1), and POD 3 (postoperative day 3). Secondary outcomes included awakening time, extubation time, VAS scores at 1, 6, 12 hours after extubation and hemodynamic parameters at different time points.

Results: The MMSE scores in the observation group were significantly higher than those in the control group both on the POD 1 (23.06 ± 1.01 vs 20.50 ± 0.51, mean difference 2.56 [95% CI 2.18 to 2.93]; P < 0.001) and POD 3 (25.56 ± 0.51 vs 23.36 ± 0.49, mean difference 2.19 [95% CI 1.96 to 2.43]; P < 0.001). The postoperative awakening time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 11.83 ± 1.00 min, mean difference -8.33 [95% CI -8.71 to -7.95]; p < 0.001) and extubation time (3.50 ± 0.56 vs 13.08 ± 0.84 min, mean difference -9.58 [95% CI -9.92 to -9.25]; p < 0.001) in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group. Furthermore, Visual analogue scale (VAS) scores in the observation group were lower than those in the control group at 1 hour (1.28 ± 0.61 vs 4.92 ± 0.77, mean difference -3.64 [95% CI -3.97 to -3.31]; p < 0.001), 6 hours (1.36 ± 0.54 vs 5.67 ± 0.68, mean difference -4.31 [95% CI -4.59 to -4.02]; p < 0.001), and 12 hours post-extubation(3.44 ± 0.50 vs 7.67 ± 0.48, mean difference -4.22 [95% CI -4.45 to -3.99]; p < 0.001). Hemodynamic stability was superior in the observation group across perioperative phases.

Conclusions: Combining RNB with GA preserves postoperative cognitive function, accelerates recovery, and enhances analgesia in elbow joint release surgery. These findings support RNB as an adjunct to GA to mitigate POCD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Surgery (IJS) has a broad scope, encompassing all surgical specialties. Its primary objective is to facilitate the exchange of crucial ideas and lines of thought between and across these specialties.By doing so, the journal aims to counter the growing trend of increasing sub-specialization, which can result in "tunnel-vision" and the isolation of significant surgical advancements within specific specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信