非甾体矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂与2型糖尿病心血管事件:一项回顾性研究

IF 6.1 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Yi-Hsien Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Mon-Ting Chen, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Ming-Hsien Tsai
{"title":"非甾体矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂与2型糖尿病心血管事件:一项回顾性研究","authors":"Yi-Hsien Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Mon-Ting Chen, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Ming-Hsien Tsai","doi":"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as finerenone mitigate cardiorenal risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Real-world evidence comparing finerenone with spironolactone and eplerenone remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes in T2DM patients treated with finerenone versus spironolactone or eplerenone using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network database. Adult patients with T2DM who were newly prescribed finerenone, spironolactone, or eplerenone were included (2021-2024). One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to eligible participants, resulting in 2,957 finerenone users matching with spironolactone users and 1,603 finerenone users matching with eplerenone users. Cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure, and mortality, were assessed over 24 months of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression models. Finerenone users had significantly lower rates of MACE compared with spironolactone users (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66) and eplerenone (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87). Mortality was also reduced with finerenone versus spironolactone (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35-0.57) and eplerenone (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.75). Heart failure events were fewer with finerenone than with spironolactone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.90) and eplerenone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99). Differences in acute myocardial infarction and stroke rates were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finerenone demonstrated superior cardiovascular outcomes compared with spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with T2DM with significant reductions in MACE, mortality, and heart failure events.</p>","PeriodicalId":11982,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Yi-Hsien Chen, Yu-Wei Fang, Mon-Ting Chen, Hung-Hsiang Liou, Ming-Hsien Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf048\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as finerenone mitigate cardiorenal risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Real-world evidence comparing finerenone with spironolactone and eplerenone remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes in T2DM patients treated with finerenone versus spironolactone or eplerenone using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network database. Adult patients with T2DM who were newly prescribed finerenone, spironolactone, or eplerenone were included (2021-2024). One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to eligible participants, resulting in 2,957 finerenone users matching with spironolactone users and 1,603 finerenone users matching with eplerenone users. Cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure, and mortality, were assessed over 24 months of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression models. Finerenone users had significantly lower rates of MACE compared with spironolactone users (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66) and eplerenone (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87). Mortality was also reduced with finerenone versus spironolactone (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35-0.57) and eplerenone (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.75). Heart failure events were fewer with finerenone than with spironolactone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.90) and eplerenone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99). Differences in acute myocardial infarction and stroke rates were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Finerenone demonstrated superior cardiovascular outcomes compared with spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with T2DM with significant reductions in MACE, mortality, and heart failure events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf048\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcvp/pvaf048","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:非甾体类矿物皮质激素受体拮抗剂如芬尼酮可减轻2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的心肾风险。比较芬尼酮与螺内酯和依普利酮的实际证据仍然有限。本研究旨在利用真实数据评估芬尼酮与螺内酯或依普利酮治疗2型糖尿病患者的心血管结局。方法与结果:采用TriNetX美国协同网络数据库进行回顾性队列分析。纳入新开芬尼酮、螺内酯或依普利酮的成年T2DM患者(2021-2024年)。对符合条件的参与者进行一对一倾向评分匹配,结果有2,957名芬尼酮使用者与螺内酯使用者匹配,1,603名芬尼酮使用者与依普利酮使用者匹配。在24个月的随访中评估心血管结局,包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)、心力衰竭和死亡率。采用Cox回归模型计算风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)。芬尼酮使用者的MACE发生率明显低于螺内酯使用者(HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66)和依普利酮使用者(HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87)。细芬烯酮与螺内酯(HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35-0.57)和依普利酮(HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.75)相比,死亡率也有所降低。细烯酮组的心力衰竭事件少于螺内酯组(HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.90)和依普利酮组(HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99)。急性心肌梗死和卒中发生率的差异无统计学意义。结论:与螺内酯和依普利酮相比,芬尼酮在T2DM患者中表现出更好的心血管预后,显著降低MACE、死亡率和心力衰竭事件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonsteroidal Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists and Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes: A Retrospective Study.

Aims: Nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists such as finerenone mitigate cardiorenal risks in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Real-world evidence comparing finerenone with spironolactone and eplerenone remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the cardiovascular outcomes in T2DM patients treated with finerenone versus spironolactone or eplerenone using real-world data.

Methods and results: A retrospective cohort analysis was conducted using the TriNetX US Collaborative Network database. Adult patients with T2DM who were newly prescribed finerenone, spironolactone, or eplerenone were included (2021-2024). One-to-one propensity score matching was applied to eligible participants, resulting in 2,957 finerenone users matching with spironolactone users and 1,603 finerenone users matching with eplerenone users. Cardiovascular outcomes, including major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), heart failure, and mortality, were assessed over 24 months of follow-up. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using Cox regression models. Finerenone users had significantly lower rates of MACE compared with spironolactone users (HR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.43-0.66) and eplerenone (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.50-0.87). Mortality was also reduced with finerenone versus spironolactone (HR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.35-0.57) and eplerenone (HR: 0.56, 95% CI: 0.41-0.75). Heart failure events were fewer with finerenone than with spironolactone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.90) and eplerenone (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.50-0.99). Differences in acute myocardial infarction and stroke rates were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Finerenone demonstrated superior cardiovascular outcomes compared with spironolactone and eplerenone in patients with T2DM with significant reductions in MACE, mortality, and heart failure events.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy
European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
14.10%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy (EHJ-CVP) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published in English, specifically dedicated to clinical cardiovascular pharmacology. EHJ-CVP publishes original articles focusing on clinical research involving both new and established drugs and methods, along with meta-analyses and topical reviews. The journal's primary aim is to enhance the pharmacological treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease by interpreting and integrating new scientific developments in this field. While the emphasis is on clinical topics, EHJ-CVP also considers basic research articles from fields such as physiology and molecular biology that contribute to the understanding of cardiovascular drug therapy. These may include articles related to new drug development and evaluation, the physiological and pharmacological basis of drug action, metabolism, drug interactions, and side effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信