Alex Jaimes, Jaime Rodríguez-Vico, Olga Pajares, Ignacio Eguilior Caffarena, Anna Lena Nystrom Hernández, Andrea Gómez, Jesús Porta-Etessam
{"title":"抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应性偏头痛患者用联合剂治疗的回顾性队列研究:RESCUE研究。","authors":"Alex Jaimes, Jaime Rodríguez-Vico, Olga Pajares, Ignacio Eguilior Caffarena, Anna Lena Nystrom Hernández, Andrea Gómez, Jesús Porta-Etessam","doi":"10.1177/03331024251346925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundA subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) does not respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), even after switching agents. Although atogepant is effective in EM and CM, its role in individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs remains to be elucidated. We hypothesize that atogepant may be a viable preventive option in these cases.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in EM and CM individuals who discontinued anti-CGRP mAbs due to lack or loss of efficacy and were subsequently treated with atogepant. The primary endpoint was the ≥50% response rate in monthly headache days (MHDs). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% and ≥75% response rates in MHDs, response rates in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (MSHDs), and changes in MHDs, MSHDs, acute medication days (AMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.ResultsOf 213 screened records, 44 participants met inclusion criteria; 39 (88.6%) were female and 39 (88.6%) had CM. Prior use of anti-CGRP mAbs included erenumab in 11.4% of participants, galcanezumab in 52.3% and fremanezumab in 86.3%. After three months, 18.2% achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs; ≥30% and ≥75% response rates were 25.0% and 6.8% respectively. For MSHDs, ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 47.6%, 33.3% and 19.0%, respectively. Median MHDs decreased from 24.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 16.0-30.0; range 9.0-31.0) to 21.5 (IQR = 10.0-30.0; range 3.0-31.0; <i>p</i> = 0.011), and median MSHDs from 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-25.5; range 5.0-30.0) to 12.0 (IQR = 5.9-19.0; range 0.0-30.0; <i>p</i> = 0.001). AMDs and HIT-6 scores also showed significant reductions. According to the PGI scale, 59.1% of individuals reported some degree of improvement. AEs occurred in 50.0% of participants, most commonly constipation (31.8%). Five (11.4%) participants discontinued treatment due to side effects.ConclusionsAfter three months of treatment, atogepant led to a clinically meaningful improvement in a subset of participants. It may be a valuable preventive option for individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs and warrants further investigation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 6","pages":"3331024251346925"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective cohort study of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody unresponsive migraine individuals treated with atogepant: The RESCUE study.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Jaimes, Jaime Rodríguez-Vico, Olga Pajares, Ignacio Eguilior Caffarena, Anna Lena Nystrom Hernández, Andrea Gómez, Jesús Porta-Etessam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024251346925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundA subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) does not respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), even after switching agents. Although atogepant is effective in EM and CM, its role in individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs remains to be elucidated. We hypothesize that atogepant may be a viable preventive option in these cases.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in EM and CM individuals who discontinued anti-CGRP mAbs due to lack or loss of efficacy and were subsequently treated with atogepant. The primary endpoint was the ≥50% response rate in monthly headache days (MHDs). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% and ≥75% response rates in MHDs, response rates in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (MSHDs), and changes in MHDs, MSHDs, acute medication days (AMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.ResultsOf 213 screened records, 44 participants met inclusion criteria; 39 (88.6%) were female and 39 (88.6%) had CM. Prior use of anti-CGRP mAbs included erenumab in 11.4% of participants, galcanezumab in 52.3% and fremanezumab in 86.3%. After three months, 18.2% achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs; ≥30% and ≥75% response rates were 25.0% and 6.8% respectively. For MSHDs, ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 47.6%, 33.3% and 19.0%, respectively. Median MHDs decreased from 24.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 16.0-30.0; range 9.0-31.0) to 21.5 (IQR = 10.0-30.0; range 3.0-31.0; <i>p</i> = 0.011), and median MSHDs from 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-25.5; range 5.0-30.0) to 12.0 (IQR = 5.9-19.0; range 0.0-30.0; <i>p</i> = 0.001). AMDs and HIT-6 scores also showed significant reductions. According to the PGI scale, 59.1% of individuals reported some degree of improvement. AEs occurred in 50.0% of participants, most commonly constipation (31.8%). Five (11.4%) participants discontinued treatment due to side effects.ConclusionsAfter three months of treatment, atogepant led to a clinically meaningful improvement in a subset of participants. It may be a valuable preventive option for individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs and warrants further investigation in prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"3331024251346925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251346925\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251346925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Retrospective cohort study of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody unresponsive migraine individuals treated with atogepant: The RESCUE study.
BackgroundA subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) does not respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), even after switching agents. Although atogepant is effective in EM and CM, its role in individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs remains to be elucidated. We hypothesize that atogepant may be a viable preventive option in these cases.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in EM and CM individuals who discontinued anti-CGRP mAbs due to lack or loss of efficacy and were subsequently treated with atogepant. The primary endpoint was the ≥50% response rate in monthly headache days (MHDs). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% and ≥75% response rates in MHDs, response rates in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (MSHDs), and changes in MHDs, MSHDs, acute medication days (AMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.ResultsOf 213 screened records, 44 participants met inclusion criteria; 39 (88.6%) were female and 39 (88.6%) had CM. Prior use of anti-CGRP mAbs included erenumab in 11.4% of participants, galcanezumab in 52.3% and fremanezumab in 86.3%. After three months, 18.2% achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs; ≥30% and ≥75% response rates were 25.0% and 6.8% respectively. For MSHDs, ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 47.6%, 33.3% and 19.0%, respectively. Median MHDs decreased from 24.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 16.0-30.0; range 9.0-31.0) to 21.5 (IQR = 10.0-30.0; range 3.0-31.0; p = 0.011), and median MSHDs from 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-25.5; range 5.0-30.0) to 12.0 (IQR = 5.9-19.0; range 0.0-30.0; p = 0.001). AMDs and HIT-6 scores also showed significant reductions. According to the PGI scale, 59.1% of individuals reported some degree of improvement. AEs occurred in 50.0% of participants, most commonly constipation (31.8%). Five (11.4%) participants discontinued treatment due to side effects.ConclusionsAfter three months of treatment, atogepant led to a clinically meaningful improvement in a subset of participants. It may be a valuable preventive option for individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs and warrants further investigation in prospective studies.
期刊介绍:
Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.