抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应性偏头痛患者用联合剂治疗的回顾性队列研究:RESCUE研究。

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Cephalalgia Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-12 DOI:10.1177/03331024251346925
Alex Jaimes, Jaime Rodríguez-Vico, Olga Pajares, Ignacio Eguilior Caffarena, Anna Lena Nystrom Hernández, Andrea Gómez, Jesús Porta-Etessam
{"title":"抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应性偏头痛患者用联合剂治疗的回顾性队列研究:RESCUE研究。","authors":"Alex Jaimes, Jaime Rodríguez-Vico, Olga Pajares, Ignacio Eguilior Caffarena, Anna Lena Nystrom Hernández, Andrea Gómez, Jesús Porta-Etessam","doi":"10.1177/03331024251346925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundA subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) does not respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), even after switching agents. Although atogepant is effective in EM and CM, its role in individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs remains to be elucidated. We hypothesize that atogepant may be a viable preventive option in these cases.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in EM and CM individuals who discontinued anti-CGRP mAbs due to lack or loss of efficacy and were subsequently treated with atogepant. The primary endpoint was the ≥50% response rate in monthly headache days (MHDs). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% and ≥75% response rates in MHDs, response rates in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (MSHDs), and changes in MHDs, MSHDs, acute medication days (AMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.ResultsOf 213 screened records, 44 participants met inclusion criteria; 39 (88.6%) were female and 39 (88.6%) had CM. Prior use of anti-CGRP mAbs included erenumab in 11.4% of participants, galcanezumab in 52.3% and fremanezumab in 86.3%. After three months, 18.2% achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs; ≥30% and ≥75% response rates were 25.0% and 6.8% respectively. For MSHDs, ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 47.6%, 33.3% and 19.0%, respectively. Median MHDs decreased from 24.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 16.0-30.0; range 9.0-31.0) to 21.5 (IQR = 10.0-30.0; range 3.0-31.0; <i>p</i> = 0.011), and median MSHDs from 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-25.5; range 5.0-30.0) to 12.0 (IQR = 5.9-19.0; range 0.0-30.0; <i>p</i> = 0.001). AMDs and HIT-6 scores also showed significant reductions. According to the PGI scale, 59.1% of individuals reported some degree of improvement. AEs occurred in 50.0% of participants, most commonly constipation (31.8%). Five (11.4%) participants discontinued treatment due to side effects.ConclusionsAfter three months of treatment, atogepant led to a clinically meaningful improvement in a subset of participants. It may be a valuable preventive option for individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs and warrants further investigation in prospective studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10075,"journal":{"name":"Cephalalgia","volume":"45 6","pages":"3331024251346925"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Retrospective cohort study of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody unresponsive migraine individuals treated with atogepant: The RESCUE study.\",\"authors\":\"Alex Jaimes, Jaime Rodríguez-Vico, Olga Pajares, Ignacio Eguilior Caffarena, Anna Lena Nystrom Hernández, Andrea Gómez, Jesús Porta-Etessam\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/03331024251346925\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundA subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) does not respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), even after switching agents. Although atogepant is effective in EM and CM, its role in individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs remains to be elucidated. We hypothesize that atogepant may be a viable preventive option in these cases.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in EM and CM individuals who discontinued anti-CGRP mAbs due to lack or loss of efficacy and were subsequently treated with atogepant. The primary endpoint was the ≥50% response rate in monthly headache days (MHDs). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% and ≥75% response rates in MHDs, response rates in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (MSHDs), and changes in MHDs, MSHDs, acute medication days (AMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.ResultsOf 213 screened records, 44 participants met inclusion criteria; 39 (88.6%) were female and 39 (88.6%) had CM. Prior use of anti-CGRP mAbs included erenumab in 11.4% of participants, galcanezumab in 52.3% and fremanezumab in 86.3%. After three months, 18.2% achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs; ≥30% and ≥75% response rates were 25.0% and 6.8% respectively. For MSHDs, ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 47.6%, 33.3% and 19.0%, respectively. Median MHDs decreased from 24.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 16.0-30.0; range 9.0-31.0) to 21.5 (IQR = 10.0-30.0; range 3.0-31.0; <i>p</i> = 0.011), and median MSHDs from 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-25.5; range 5.0-30.0) to 12.0 (IQR = 5.9-19.0; range 0.0-30.0; <i>p</i> = 0.001). AMDs and HIT-6 scores also showed significant reductions. According to the PGI scale, 59.1% of individuals reported some degree of improvement. AEs occurred in 50.0% of participants, most commonly constipation (31.8%). Five (11.4%) participants discontinued treatment due to side effects.ConclusionsAfter three months of treatment, atogepant led to a clinically meaningful improvement in a subset of participants. It may be a valuable preventive option for individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs and warrants further investigation in prospective studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10075,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"volume\":\"45 6\",\"pages\":\"3331024251346925\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cephalalgia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251346925\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cephalalgia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03331024251346925","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:一小部分患有发作性偏头痛(EM)和慢性偏头痛(CM)的患者对抗降钙素基因相关肽(CGRP)单克隆抗体(mab)没有反应,即使在转换药物后也是如此。虽然联合剂对EM和CM有效,但其在抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应的个体中的作用仍有待阐明。我们假设,在这些情况下,联合剂可能是一种可行的预防选择。方法:我们对EM和CM患者进行了回顾性队列研究,这些患者因缺乏或丧失抗cgrp单克隆抗体而停用抗cgrp单克隆抗体,随后接受了抗cgrp单克隆抗体治疗。主要终点是每月头痛天数(mhd)的缓解率≥50%。次要结局包括mhd≥30%和≥75%的缓解率,每月中重度头痛天数(MSHDs)的缓解率,mhd、MSHDs、急性用药天数(AMDs)和头痛影响试验(HIT-6)的变化。记录患者总体印象(PGI)评分和不良事件(ae)。结果213例筛选记录中,44例符合纳入标准;女性39例(88.6%),CM 39例(88.6%)。先前使用抗cgrp单克隆抗体的参与者包括11.4%的erenumab, 52.3%的galcanezumab和86.3%的fremanezumab。3个月后,18.2%的患者mhd降低≥50%;≥30%和≥75%有效率分别为25.0%和6.8%。对于MSHDs,≥30%、≥50%和≥75%的有效率分别为47.6%、33.3%和19.0%。中位数mhd从24.5下降(四分位数间距(IQR) = 16.0-30.0;范围9.0-31.0)至21.5 (IQR = 10.0-30.0;范围3.0 - -31.0;p = 0.011),中位mshd为15.0 (IQR = 10.0-25.5;范围5.0-30.0)至12.0 (IQR = 5.9-19.0;范围0.0 - -30.0;p = 0.001)。amd和HIT-6分数也有显著下降。根据PGI量表,59.1%的人报告有一定程度的改善。50.0%的参与者发生不良反应,最常见的是便秘(31.8%)。5名(11.4%)参与者因副作用停止治疗。结论:治疗3个月后,atgeagent对一部分参与者有临床意义的改善。对于对抗cgrp单克隆抗体无反应的个体,它可能是一种有价值的预防选择,值得进一步的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Retrospective cohort study of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody unresponsive migraine individuals treated with atogepant: The RESCUE study.

BackgroundA subset of individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) does not respond to anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), even after switching agents. Although atogepant is effective in EM and CM, its role in individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs remains to be elucidated. We hypothesize that atogepant may be a viable preventive option in these cases.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study in EM and CM individuals who discontinued anti-CGRP mAbs due to lack or loss of efficacy and were subsequently treated with atogepant. The primary endpoint was the ≥50% response rate in monthly headache days (MHDs). Secondary outcomes included ≥30% and ≥75% response rates in MHDs, response rates in monthly moderate-to-severe headache days (MSHDs), and changes in MHDs, MSHDs, acute medication days (AMDs) and Headache Impact Test (HIT-6). Patient Global Impression (PGI) scores and adverse events (AEs) were recorded.ResultsOf 213 screened records, 44 participants met inclusion criteria; 39 (88.6%) were female and 39 (88.6%) had CM. Prior use of anti-CGRP mAbs included erenumab in 11.4% of participants, galcanezumab in 52.3% and fremanezumab in 86.3%. After three months, 18.2% achieved a ≥50% reduction in MHDs; ≥30% and ≥75% response rates were 25.0% and 6.8% respectively. For MSHDs, ≥30%, ≥50% and ≥75% response rates were 47.6%, 33.3% and 19.0%, respectively. Median MHDs decreased from 24.5 (interquartile range (IQR) = 16.0-30.0; range 9.0-31.0) to 21.5 (IQR = 10.0-30.0; range 3.0-31.0; p = 0.011), and median MSHDs from 15.0 (IQR = 10.0-25.5; range 5.0-30.0) to 12.0 (IQR = 5.9-19.0; range 0.0-30.0; p = 0.001). AMDs and HIT-6 scores also showed significant reductions. According to the PGI scale, 59.1% of individuals reported some degree of improvement. AEs occurred in 50.0% of participants, most commonly constipation (31.8%). Five (11.4%) participants discontinued treatment due to side effects.ConclusionsAfter three months of treatment, atogepant led to a clinically meaningful improvement in a subset of participants. It may be a valuable preventive option for individuals unresponsive to anti-CGRP mAbs and warrants further investigation in prospective studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cephalalgia
Cephalalgia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
6.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Cephalalgia contains original peer reviewed papers on all aspects of headache. The journal provides an international forum for original research papers, review articles and short communications. Published monthly on behalf of the International Headache Society, Cephalalgia''s rapid review averages 5 ½ weeks from author submission to first decision.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信