[关于实施以人口为基础的预防非传染性疾病措施的思考]。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Kerstin Sell, Stephan Voss, Eva A Rehfuess
{"title":"[关于实施以人口为基础的预防非传染性疾病措施的思考]。","authors":"Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Kerstin Sell, Stephan Voss, Eva A Rehfuess","doi":"10.1007/s00103-025-04078-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In view of the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the focus is shifting increasingly towards structural prevention measures. Effective implementation of these measures is crucial. Using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework, this article reflects on the implementation of two ratio prevention measures and discusses challenges in the application of implementation science approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case 1 (Collaboration for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Public Health in Africa-CEBHA+) examined measures for the prevention of NCDs and road traffic accidents in sub-Saharan Africa. Case 2 (\"Präventionskette Freiham\") evaluated a community network in Germany that aims to enable children and adolescents from socially disadvantaged families to grow up well and healthy. Data published in project-related publications served as the basis for the analysis, supplemented by a questionnaire-based reflection by the researchers involved. For both data sources, the data collected were coded inductively and assigned to the deductive categories of the CICI Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both cases, contextual and structural conditions, implementation agents, and strategies were assessed on multiple levels, with an emphasis on implementation agents. While Präventionskette Freiham pursued a systematic process evaluation with explicit use of implementation science approaches, this was only implicitly considered in CEBHA+, which makes comparability, classification in the literature, and overarching consideration more difficult.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation science approaches should be given a stronger focus in the field of relationship prevention in order to fully exploit their potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":9562,"journal":{"name":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","volume":" ","pages":"787-796"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Reflections on implementing population-based measures for the prevention of non-communicable diseases].\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M Pfadenhauer, Kerstin Sell, Stephan Voss, Eva A Rehfuess\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00103-025-04078-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In view of the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the focus is shifting increasingly towards structural prevention measures. Effective implementation of these measures is crucial. Using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework, this article reflects on the implementation of two ratio prevention measures and discusses challenges in the application of implementation science approaches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Case 1 (Collaboration for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Public Health in Africa-CEBHA+) examined measures for the prevention of NCDs and road traffic accidents in sub-Saharan Africa. Case 2 (\\\"Präventionskette Freiham\\\") evaluated a community network in Germany that aims to enable children and adolescents from socially disadvantaged families to grow up well and healthy. Data published in project-related publications served as the basis for the analysis, supplemented by a questionnaire-based reflection by the researchers involved. For both data sources, the data collected were coded inductively and assigned to the deductive categories of the CICI Framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In both cases, contextual and structural conditions, implementation agents, and strategies were assessed on multiple levels, with an emphasis on implementation agents. While Präventionskette Freiham pursued a systematic process evaluation with explicit use of implementation science approaches, this was only implicitly considered in CEBHA+, which makes comparability, classification in the literature, and overarching consideration more difficult.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Implementation science approaches should be given a stronger focus in the field of relationship prevention in order to fully exploit their potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9562,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"787-796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04078-6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/12 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00103-025-04078-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:鉴于非传染性疾病的全球负担,重点正日益转向结构性预防措施。有效执行这些措施至关重要。本文利用复杂干预(CICI)框架的背景和实施,对两种比率预防措施的实施进行了反思,并讨论了实施科学方法在应用中的挑战。方法:案例1(非洲循证医疗保健和公共卫生合作- cebha +)审查了撒哈拉以南非洲预防非传染性疾病和道路交通事故的措施。案例2 ("Präventionskette Freiham")评估了德国的一个社区网络,该网络旨在使社会处境不利家庭的儿童和青少年健康成长。发表在与项目有关的出版物上的数据作为分析的基础,并由参与的研究人员以问卷为基础进行补充。对于这两个数据源,收集的数据进行了归纳编码,并分配给CICI框架的演绎类别。结果:在这两种情况下,上下文和结构条件、实施主体和策略在多个层面上进行了评估,重点是实施主体。虽然Präventionskette Freiham通过明确使用实现科学方法进行了系统的过程评估,但CEBHA+中仅隐含地考虑了这一点,这使得文献中的可比性、分类和总体考虑更加困难。讨论:实施科学方法应在关系预防领域得到更大的重视,以充分发挥其潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Reflections on implementing population-based measures for the prevention of non-communicable diseases].

Background: In view of the global burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs), the focus is shifting increasingly towards structural prevention measures. Effective implementation of these measures is crucial. Using the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) Framework, this article reflects on the implementation of two ratio prevention measures and discusses challenges in the application of implementation science approaches.

Methods: Case 1 (Collaboration for Evidence-Based Healthcare and Public Health in Africa-CEBHA+) examined measures for the prevention of NCDs and road traffic accidents in sub-Saharan Africa. Case 2 ("Präventionskette Freiham") evaluated a community network in Germany that aims to enable children and adolescents from socially disadvantaged families to grow up well and healthy. Data published in project-related publications served as the basis for the analysis, supplemented by a questionnaire-based reflection by the researchers involved. For both data sources, the data collected were coded inductively and assigned to the deductive categories of the CICI Framework.

Results: In both cases, contextual and structural conditions, implementation agents, and strategies were assessed on multiple levels, with an emphasis on implementation agents. While Präventionskette Freiham pursued a systematic process evaluation with explicit use of implementation science approaches, this was only implicitly considered in CEBHA+, which makes comparability, classification in the literature, and overarching consideration more difficult.

Discussion: Implementation science approaches should be given a stronger focus in the field of relationship prevention in order to fully exploit their potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz
Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
145
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Die Monatszeitschrift Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - umfasst alle Fragestellungen und Bereiche, mit denen sich das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen und die staatliche Gesundheitspolitik auseinandersetzen. Ziel ist es, zum einen über wesentliche Entwicklungen in der biologisch-medizinischen Grundlagenforschung auf dem Laufenden zu halten und zum anderen über konkrete Maßnahmen zum Gesundheitsschutz, über Konzepte der Prävention, Risikoabwehr und Gesundheitsförderung zu informieren. Wichtige Themengebiete sind die Epidemiologie übertragbarer und nicht übertragbarer Krankheiten, der umweltbezogene Gesundheitsschutz sowie gesundheitsökonomische, medizinethische und -rechtliche Fragestellungen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信