{"title":"三十年隆鼻硅胶植入术的经验:一种更安全、更便宜、更快速、更有效的技术。","authors":"Edmund Kwan, Albert Truong, Justin Park","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjaf102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Debate about the advantages and disadvantages of alloplastic vs autologous implant material for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty continues among the aesthetic surgery community. Silicone implants are criticized for high rates of infection and extrusion; however, autologous methods increase the risk of warping and resorption, and donor-site deformity, which may affect positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to demonstrate that silicone implants are a safe and reliable method of nasal augmentation when performed with proper technique, in an appropriate setting, and by qualified practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 1019 patients who underwent implant rhinoplasty from February 1995 to October 2024 by a single surgeon. All procedures were performed in a QuadA-certified operating room under anesthesia by the senior author. I-shaped silicone implants were used for dorsal augmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common complication was due to malposition of the implant (n = 37, 4%), subjective dissatisfaction was the leading reason for revision (n = 43, 4%). Rates of extrusion and infection were low (n = 9, <1%; n = 4, <0.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with previously reported results for silicone implant rhinoplasty, this study found that complications can be minimized with proper techniques, such as creating a precise subperiosteal pocket, selecting an appropriate implant length, and minimizing tension at the tip. This risk profile indicates that silicone implant augmentation rhinoplasty is a safe technique and should be considered for its benefits of shorter operation times, cost-effectiveness, and aesthetic outcomes especially in ethnic populations.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":"887-892"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thirty-Year Experience in Augmentation Rhinoplasty Using Silicone Implants: A Safer, Cheaper, Faster, and More Effective Technique.\",\"authors\":\"Edmund Kwan, Albert Truong, Justin Park\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/asj/sjaf102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Debate about the advantages and disadvantages of alloplastic vs autologous implant material for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty continues among the aesthetic surgery community. Silicone implants are criticized for high rates of infection and extrusion; however, autologous methods increase the risk of warping and resorption, and donor-site deformity, which may affect positive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of this study was to demonstrate that silicone implants are a safe and reliable method of nasal augmentation when performed with proper technique, in an appropriate setting, and by qualified practitioners.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective chart review was conducted on 1019 patients who underwent implant rhinoplasty from February 1995 to October 2024 by a single surgeon. All procedures were performed in a QuadA-certified operating room under anesthesia by the senior author. I-shaped silicone implants were used for dorsal augmentation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common complication was due to malposition of the implant (n = 37, 4%), subjective dissatisfaction was the leading reason for revision (n = 43, 4%). Rates of extrusion and infection were low (n = 9, <1%; n = 4, <0.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with previously reported results for silicone implant rhinoplasty, this study found that complications can be minimized with proper techniques, such as creating a precise subperiosteal pocket, selecting an appropriate implant length, and minimizing tension at the tip. This risk profile indicates that silicone implant augmentation rhinoplasty is a safe technique and should be considered for its benefits of shorter operation times, cost-effectiveness, and aesthetic outcomes especially in ethnic populations.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 4: </strong></p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7728,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"887-892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12451693/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aesthetic Surgery Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf102\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjaf102","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Thirty-Year Experience in Augmentation Rhinoplasty Using Silicone Implants: A Safer, Cheaper, Faster, and More Effective Technique.
Background: Debate about the advantages and disadvantages of alloplastic vs autologous implant material for dorsal augmentation rhinoplasty continues among the aesthetic surgery community. Silicone implants are criticized for high rates of infection and extrusion; however, autologous methods increase the risk of warping and resorption, and donor-site deformity, which may affect positive outcomes.
Objectives: The aim of this study was to demonstrate that silicone implants are a safe and reliable method of nasal augmentation when performed with proper technique, in an appropriate setting, and by qualified practitioners.
Methods: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 1019 patients who underwent implant rhinoplasty from February 1995 to October 2024 by a single surgeon. All procedures were performed in a QuadA-certified operating room under anesthesia by the senior author. I-shaped silicone implants were used for dorsal augmentation.
Results: The most common complication was due to malposition of the implant (n = 37, 4%), subjective dissatisfaction was the leading reason for revision (n = 43, 4%). Rates of extrusion and infection were low (n = 9, <1%; n = 4, <0.4%).
Conclusions: Compared with previously reported results for silicone implant rhinoplasty, this study found that complications can be minimized with proper techniques, such as creating a precise subperiosteal pocket, selecting an appropriate implant length, and minimizing tension at the tip. This risk profile indicates that silicone implant augmentation rhinoplasty is a safe technique and should be considered for its benefits of shorter operation times, cost-effectiveness, and aesthetic outcomes especially in ethnic populations.
期刊介绍:
Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.