巨细胞动脉炎患者的主动脉和颈动脉并发症。

IF 4.1 1区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
J Anthony Chacko, Muhammad Z Chauhan, Paul H Phillips, Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah, Joseph G Chacko
{"title":"巨细胞动脉炎患者的主动脉和颈动脉并发症。","authors":"J Anthony Chacko, Muhammad Z Chauhan, Paul H Phillips, Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah, Joseph G Chacko","doi":"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the risk of developing aortic aneurysms (AAs) and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), particularly among those presenting with and without visual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 7,294 patients aged ≥50 years with biopsy-proven GCA (temporal artery biopsy within two weeks of diagnosis and ≥3 prednisone refills) were identified and compared to 265,948 control patients presenting with tension-type headache utilizing the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. A secondary comparison was performed between GCA patients with (n=2,390) and without (n=5,222) visual symptoms (e.g., diplopia, amaurosis fugax, vision loss).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GCA was defined using ICD-10 codes M31.5 and M31.6. Patients with a history of other vasculitides, prior aortic aneurysms, or major thrombotic events were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance demographics, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, substance use, and laboratory/vital parameters, resulting in matched cohorts for each comparison. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models to account for time to onset of vascular complications.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were the 5-year risks of (1) thoracic aortic aneurysms, (2) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, (3) abdominal aortic aneurysms, and (4) carotid artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 7,252 patients remained in each arm for the primary GCA versus control comparison. GCA patients had a significantly higher 5-year risk of any aortic aneurysm (3.59% vs 1.75%; aHR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.59-2.45), including thoracic (2.23% vs 1.02%; aHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.59-2.77), thoracoabdominal (0.32% vs 0.14%; aHR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.50-9.05), and abdominal (1.80% vs 0.82%; aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49-2.77). Carotid artery stenosis was also elevated in GCA (7.20% vs 4.37%; aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.38-1.84). In the subanalysis of GCA patients, the 5-year risk of any aortic aneurysm was comparable between those with and without visual symptoms (3.58% vs 3.23%; aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.83-1.57). However, carotid artery stenosis occurred more frequently in GCA patients presenting with visual symptoms (8.95% vs 7.43%; aHR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with GCA demonstrate a substantially increased risk of aortic aneurysms, particularly thoracic aortic aneurysms, compared to matched controls. Although having visual symptoms did not correlate with additional aortic risk, it was associated with a higher risk of carotid artery stenosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":7568,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aortic and Carotid Complications in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis.\",\"authors\":\"J Anthony Chacko, Muhammad Z Chauhan, Paul H Phillips, Raghu H Ramakrishnaiah, Joseph G Chacko\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the risk of developing aortic aneurysms (AAs) and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), particularly among those presenting with and without visual symptoms.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>A total of 7,294 patients aged ≥50 years with biopsy-proven GCA (temporal artery biopsy within two weeks of diagnosis and ≥3 prednisone refills) were identified and compared to 265,948 control patients presenting with tension-type headache utilizing the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. A secondary comparison was performed between GCA patients with (n=2,390) and without (n=5,222) visual symptoms (e.g., diplopia, amaurosis fugax, vision loss).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>GCA was defined using ICD-10 codes M31.5 and M31.6. Patients with a history of other vasculitides, prior aortic aneurysms, or major thrombotic events were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance demographics, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, substance use, and laboratory/vital parameters, resulting in matched cohorts for each comparison. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models to account for time to onset of vascular complications.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Primary outcomes were the 5-year risks of (1) thoracic aortic aneurysms, (2) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, (3) abdominal aortic aneurysms, and (4) carotid artery stenosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 7,252 patients remained in each arm for the primary GCA versus control comparison. GCA patients had a significantly higher 5-year risk of any aortic aneurysm (3.59% vs 1.75%; aHR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.59-2.45), including thoracic (2.23% vs 1.02%; aHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.59-2.77), thoracoabdominal (0.32% vs 0.14%; aHR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.50-9.05), and abdominal (1.80% vs 0.82%; aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49-2.77). Carotid artery stenosis was also elevated in GCA (7.20% vs 4.37%; aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.38-1.84). In the subanalysis of GCA patients, the 5-year risk of any aortic aneurysm was comparable between those with and without visual symptoms (3.58% vs 3.23%; aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.83-1.57). However, carotid artery stenosis occurred more frequently in GCA patients presenting with visual symptoms (8.95% vs 7.43%; aHR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients with GCA demonstrate a substantially increased risk of aortic aneurysms, particularly thoracic aortic aneurysms, compared to matched controls. Although having visual symptoms did not correlate with additional aortic risk, it was associated with a higher risk of carotid artery stenosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.001\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2025.06.001","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者发生主动脉瘤(AAs)和颈动脉狭窄(CAS)的风险,特别是那些有或无视觉症状的患者。设计:回顾性队列研究。研究对象:共有7294例年龄≥50岁的经活检证实的GCA患者(诊断后两周内颞动脉活检,并补充≥3次强的松)被确定,并与265948例出现紧张性头痛的对照患者进行比较,使用TriNetX美国协作网络。对有(n= 2390)和无(n= 5222)视力症状(如复视、黑朦、视力丧失)的GCA患者进行二次比较。方法:采用ICD-10编码M31.5、M31.6对GCA进行定义。排除有其他血管病史、既往主动脉瘤或重大血栓事件的患者。使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来平衡人口统计学、社会经济因素、合并症、物质使用和实验室/生命参数,从而为每个比较产生匹配的队列。使用Cox比例风险模型估计校正风险比(aHRs)和95%置信区间(CIs),以考虑血管并发症发生的时间。主要结局指标:主要结局为(1)胸主动脉瘤、(2)胸腹主动脉瘤、(3)腹主动脉瘤和(4)颈动脉狭窄的5年风险。结果:匹配后,每组有7252名患者进行初级GCA与对照组的比较。GCA患者发生任何主动脉瘤的5年风险明显更高(3.59% vs 1.75%;aHR, 1.98;95% CI, 1.59-2.45),包括胸段(2.23% vs 1.02%;aHR, 2.01;95% CI, 1.59-2.77),胸腹(0.32% vs 0.14%;aHR, 3.68;95% CI, 1.50-9.05)和腹部(1.80% vs 0.82%;aHR, 2.03;95% ci, 1.49-2.77)。颈动脉狭窄在GCA中也升高(7.20% vs 4.37%;aHR, 1.59;95% ci, 1.38-1.84)。在GCA患者的亚分析中,任何主动脉瘤的5年风险在有和没有视觉症状的患者之间是相当的(3.58% vs 3.23%;aHR, 1.14;95% ci, 0.83-1.57)。然而,颈动脉狭窄在有视觉症状的GCA患者中发生的频率更高(8.95% vs 7.43%;aHR, 1.24;95% ci, 1.01-1.53)。结论:与对照组相比,GCA患者发生主动脉瘤的风险明显增加,尤其是胸主动脉瘤。虽然有视觉症状与主动脉瓣增加的风险无关,但与颈动脉狭窄的高风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Aortic and Carotid Complications in Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis.

Purpose: To assess the risk of developing aortic aneurysms (AAs) and carotid artery stenosis (CAS) in patients with giant cell arteritis (GCA), particularly among those presenting with and without visual symptoms.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Subjects: A total of 7,294 patients aged ≥50 years with biopsy-proven GCA (temporal artery biopsy within two weeks of diagnosis and ≥3 prednisone refills) were identified and compared to 265,948 control patients presenting with tension-type headache utilizing the TriNetX US Collaborative Network. A secondary comparison was performed between GCA patients with (n=2,390) and without (n=5,222) visual symptoms (e.g., diplopia, amaurosis fugax, vision loss).

Methods: GCA was defined using ICD-10 codes M31.5 and M31.6. Patients with a history of other vasculitides, prior aortic aneurysms, or major thrombotic events were excluded. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance demographics, socioeconomic factors, comorbidities, substance use, and laboratory/vital parameters, resulting in matched cohorts for each comparison. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazards models to account for time to onset of vascular complications.

Main outcome measures: Primary outcomes were the 5-year risks of (1) thoracic aortic aneurysms, (2) thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms, (3) abdominal aortic aneurysms, and (4) carotid artery stenosis.

Results: After matching, 7,252 patients remained in each arm for the primary GCA versus control comparison. GCA patients had a significantly higher 5-year risk of any aortic aneurysm (3.59% vs 1.75%; aHR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.59-2.45), including thoracic (2.23% vs 1.02%; aHR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.59-2.77), thoracoabdominal (0.32% vs 0.14%; aHR, 3.68; 95% CI, 1.50-9.05), and abdominal (1.80% vs 0.82%; aHR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49-2.77). Carotid artery stenosis was also elevated in GCA (7.20% vs 4.37%; aHR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.38-1.84). In the subanalysis of GCA patients, the 5-year risk of any aortic aneurysm was comparable between those with and without visual symptoms (3.58% vs 3.23%; aHR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.83-1.57). However, carotid artery stenosis occurred more frequently in GCA patients presenting with visual symptoms (8.95% vs 7.43%; aHR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.01-1.53).

Conclusions: Patients with GCA demonstrate a substantially increased risk of aortic aneurysms, particularly thoracic aortic aneurysms, compared to matched controls. Although having visual symptoms did not correlate with additional aortic risk, it was associated with a higher risk of carotid artery stenosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
406
审稿时长
36 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Ophthalmology is a peer-reviewed, scientific publication that welcomes the submission of original, previously unpublished manuscripts directed to ophthalmologists and visual science specialists describing clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations. Published monthly since 1884, the full text of the American Journal of Ophthalmology and supplementary material are also presented online at www.AJO.com and on ScienceDirect. The American Journal of Ophthalmology publishes Full-Length Articles, Perspectives, Editorials, Correspondences, Books Reports and Announcements. Brief Reports and Case Reports are no longer published. We recommend submitting Brief Reports and Case Reports to our companion publication, the American Journal of Ophthalmology Case Reports. Manuscripts are accepted with the understanding that they have not been and will not be published elsewhere substantially in any format, and that there are no ethical problems with the content or data collection. Authors may be requested to produce the data upon which the manuscript is based and to answer expeditiously any questions about the manuscript or its authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信