S Kindt, J Arts, P Caenepeel, F de Clerck, H De Schepper, H Louis, P Latour, T Mahler, S Nullens, H Piessevaux, K Routhiaux, J Schol, M Surmont, H Vafa, C Van de Bruaene, K Van Malderen, T Vanuytsel, L Wauters, F Wuestenberghs, J Tack
{"title":"比利时对功能性消化不良患者处理的共识。","authors":"S Kindt, J Arts, P Caenepeel, F de Clerck, H De Schepper, H Louis, P Latour, T Mahler, S Nullens, H Piessevaux, K Routhiaux, J Schol, M Surmont, H Vafa, C Van de Bruaene, K Van Malderen, T Vanuytsel, L Wauters, F Wuestenberghs, J Tack","doi":"10.51821/88.1.14136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gutbrain interaction characterised by epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiation or postprandial fullness. Despite its high prevalence, clinicians struggle with the diagnosis and management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of a literature review, summarising the existing evidence, and a voting process on 119 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Belgian consensus underlines the multifactorial aetiology of FD. In addition to the cardinal symptoms, bloating and weight loss are also observed in FD. Functional dyspepsia co-exists with other DGBIs, including IBS. Subtyping based on the postprandial nature of symptoms is recommended. Patients should receive a positive diagnosis. Additional testing is not routinely required before initiating therapy, except in the presence of alarm features or treatment-refractory symptoms, and can consist of upper GI endoscopy, abdominal imaging and gastric emptying testing. The consensus refuted the role of carbohydrate malabsorption testing, pyloric impedance planimetry, pH/impedance monitoring, food allergy testing and permeability testing in FD. Explanation and reassurance, also addressing lifestyle factors, represent the cornerstone of the management. Proton Pump Inhibitors are considered the firstline pharmacological treatment. With the exception of specific neuromodulators, the panel did not achieve consensus for other therapeutic options. This consensus recommends against restrictive diets, invasive endoscopic or surgical treatment, parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, spasmolytics and opioids in the management of FD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A panel of Belgian experts summarised the existing evidence on the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of FD with attention to the availability within the Belgian healthcare system. Areas of future research are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":"88 2","pages":"157-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belgian consensus on the management of patients with functional dyspepsia.\",\"authors\":\"S Kindt, J Arts, P Caenepeel, F de Clerck, H De Schepper, H Louis, P Latour, T Mahler, S Nullens, H Piessevaux, K Routhiaux, J Schol, M Surmont, H Vafa, C Van de Bruaene, K Van Malderen, T Vanuytsel, L Wauters, F Wuestenberghs, J Tack\",\"doi\":\"10.51821/88.1.14136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gutbrain interaction characterised by epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiation or postprandial fullness. Despite its high prevalence, clinicians struggle with the diagnosis and management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of a literature review, summarising the existing evidence, and a voting process on 119 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Belgian consensus underlines the multifactorial aetiology of FD. In addition to the cardinal symptoms, bloating and weight loss are also observed in FD. Functional dyspepsia co-exists with other DGBIs, including IBS. Subtyping based on the postprandial nature of symptoms is recommended. Patients should receive a positive diagnosis. Additional testing is not routinely required before initiating therapy, except in the presence of alarm features or treatment-refractory symptoms, and can consist of upper GI endoscopy, abdominal imaging and gastric emptying testing. The consensus refuted the role of carbohydrate malabsorption testing, pyloric impedance planimetry, pH/impedance monitoring, food allergy testing and permeability testing in FD. Explanation and reassurance, also addressing lifestyle factors, represent the cornerstone of the management. Proton Pump Inhibitors are considered the firstline pharmacological treatment. With the exception of specific neuromodulators, the panel did not achieve consensus for other therapeutic options. This consensus recommends against restrictive diets, invasive endoscopic or surgical treatment, parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, spasmolytics and opioids in the management of FD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A panel of Belgian experts summarised the existing evidence on the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of FD with attention to the availability within the Belgian healthcare system. Areas of future research are identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"88 2\",\"pages\":\"157-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51821/88.1.14136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/88.1.14136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Belgian consensus on the management of patients with functional dyspepsia.
Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gutbrain interaction characterised by epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiation or postprandial fullness. Despite its high prevalence, clinicians struggle with the diagnosis and management of these patients.
Methods: A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of a literature review, summarising the existing evidence, and a voting process on 119 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.
Results: Belgian consensus underlines the multifactorial aetiology of FD. In addition to the cardinal symptoms, bloating and weight loss are also observed in FD. Functional dyspepsia co-exists with other DGBIs, including IBS. Subtyping based on the postprandial nature of symptoms is recommended. Patients should receive a positive diagnosis. Additional testing is not routinely required before initiating therapy, except in the presence of alarm features or treatment-refractory symptoms, and can consist of upper GI endoscopy, abdominal imaging and gastric emptying testing. The consensus refuted the role of carbohydrate malabsorption testing, pyloric impedance planimetry, pH/impedance monitoring, food allergy testing and permeability testing in FD. Explanation and reassurance, also addressing lifestyle factors, represent the cornerstone of the management. Proton Pump Inhibitors are considered the firstline pharmacological treatment. With the exception of specific neuromodulators, the panel did not achieve consensus for other therapeutic options. This consensus recommends against restrictive diets, invasive endoscopic or surgical treatment, parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, spasmolytics and opioids in the management of FD.
Conclusion: A panel of Belgian experts summarised the existing evidence on the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of FD with attention to the availability within the Belgian healthcare system. Areas of future research are identified.
期刊介绍:
The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.