比利时对功能性消化不良患者处理的共识。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
S Kindt, J Arts, P Caenepeel, F de Clerck, H De Schepper, H Louis, P Latour, T Mahler, S Nullens, H Piessevaux, K Routhiaux, J Schol, M Surmont, H Vafa, C Van de Bruaene, K Van Malderen, T Vanuytsel, L Wauters, F Wuestenberghs, J Tack
{"title":"比利时对功能性消化不良患者处理的共识。","authors":"S Kindt, J Arts, P Caenepeel, F de Clerck, H De Schepper, H Louis, P Latour, T Mahler, S Nullens, H Piessevaux, K Routhiaux, J Schol, M Surmont, H Vafa, C Van de Bruaene, K Van Malderen, T Vanuytsel, L Wauters, F Wuestenberghs, J Tack","doi":"10.51821/88.1.14136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gutbrain interaction characterised by epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiation or postprandial fullness. Despite its high prevalence, clinicians struggle with the diagnosis and management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of a literature review, summarising the existing evidence, and a voting process on 119 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Belgian consensus underlines the multifactorial aetiology of FD. In addition to the cardinal symptoms, bloating and weight loss are also observed in FD. Functional dyspepsia co-exists with other DGBIs, including IBS. Subtyping based on the postprandial nature of symptoms is recommended. Patients should receive a positive diagnosis. Additional testing is not routinely required before initiating therapy, except in the presence of alarm features or treatment-refractory symptoms, and can consist of upper GI endoscopy, abdominal imaging and gastric emptying testing. The consensus refuted the role of carbohydrate malabsorption testing, pyloric impedance planimetry, pH/impedance monitoring, food allergy testing and permeability testing in FD. Explanation and reassurance, also addressing lifestyle factors, represent the cornerstone of the management. Proton Pump Inhibitors are considered the firstline pharmacological treatment. With the exception of specific neuromodulators, the panel did not achieve consensus for other therapeutic options. This consensus recommends against restrictive diets, invasive endoscopic or surgical treatment, parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, spasmolytics and opioids in the management of FD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A panel of Belgian experts summarised the existing evidence on the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of FD with attention to the availability within the Belgian healthcare system. Areas of future research are identified.</p>","PeriodicalId":7322,"journal":{"name":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","volume":"88 2","pages":"157-178"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belgian consensus on the management of patients with functional dyspepsia.\",\"authors\":\"S Kindt, J Arts, P Caenepeel, F de Clerck, H De Schepper, H Louis, P Latour, T Mahler, S Nullens, H Piessevaux, K Routhiaux, J Schol, M Surmont, H Vafa, C Van de Bruaene, K Van Malderen, T Vanuytsel, L Wauters, F Wuestenberghs, J Tack\",\"doi\":\"10.51821/88.1.14136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gutbrain interaction characterised by epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiation or postprandial fullness. Despite its high prevalence, clinicians struggle with the diagnosis and management of these patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of a literature review, summarising the existing evidence, and a voting process on 119 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Belgian consensus underlines the multifactorial aetiology of FD. In addition to the cardinal symptoms, bloating and weight loss are also observed in FD. Functional dyspepsia co-exists with other DGBIs, including IBS. Subtyping based on the postprandial nature of symptoms is recommended. Patients should receive a positive diagnosis. Additional testing is not routinely required before initiating therapy, except in the presence of alarm features or treatment-refractory symptoms, and can consist of upper GI endoscopy, abdominal imaging and gastric emptying testing. The consensus refuted the role of carbohydrate malabsorption testing, pyloric impedance planimetry, pH/impedance monitoring, food allergy testing and permeability testing in FD. Explanation and reassurance, also addressing lifestyle factors, represent the cornerstone of the management. Proton Pump Inhibitors are considered the firstline pharmacological treatment. With the exception of specific neuromodulators, the panel did not achieve consensus for other therapeutic options. This consensus recommends against restrictive diets, invasive endoscopic or surgical treatment, parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, spasmolytics and opioids in the management of FD.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A panel of Belgian experts summarised the existing evidence on the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of FD with attention to the availability within the Belgian healthcare system. Areas of future research are identified.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica\",\"volume\":\"88 2\",\"pages\":\"157-178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51821/88.1.14136\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51821/88.1.14136","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:功能性消化不良(FD)是一种以胃脘痛、胃脘烧灼感、早饱或餐后饱腹为特征的肠脑相互作用紊乱。尽管发病率很高,临床医生仍在努力诊断和管理这些患者。方法:由来自比利时的20位专家进行德尔菲共识,包括文献综述,总结现有证据,并对119项声明进行投票。采用建议、评估、发展和评价标准的分级来评价证据的质量。共识被定义为达成80%的共识。结果:比利时共识强调FD的多因素病因。除了主要症状外,FD患者还观察到腹胀和体重减轻。功能性消化不良与其他dgbi共存,包括肠易激综合征。建议根据餐后症状进行分型。患者应接受阳性诊断。在开始治疗之前,常规不需要额外的检查,除非存在报警特征或治疗难治性症状,并且可以包括上消化道内窥镜检查、腹部成像和胃排空检查。该共识驳斥了碳水化合物吸收不良试验、幽门阻抗平面测量、pH/阻抗监测、食物过敏试验和渗透性试验在FD中的作用。解释和安慰,也解决生活方式的因素,是管理的基石。质子泵抑制剂被认为是第一线的药物治疗。除了特定的神经调节剂外,专家组没有就其他治疗方案达成共识。该共识不建议限制性饮食、侵入性内窥镜或手术治疗、肠外营养、抗生素、解痉药和阿片类药物用于FD的治疗。结论:比利时专家小组总结了关于FD的病因、表现、诊断和治疗的现有证据,并注意了比利时医疗保健系统内的可用性。确定了未来的研究领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Belgian consensus on the management of patients with functional dyspepsia.

Background: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a disorder of gutbrain interaction characterised by epigastric pain, epigastric burning, early satiation or postprandial fullness. Despite its high prevalence, clinicians struggle with the diagnosis and management of these patients.

Methods: A Delphi consensus was conducted by 20 experts from Belgium, and consisted of a literature review, summarising the existing evidence, and a voting process on 119 statements. Grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation criteria were applied to evaluate the quality of evidence. Consensus was defined as > 80 % agreement.

Results: Belgian consensus underlines the multifactorial aetiology of FD. In addition to the cardinal symptoms, bloating and weight loss are also observed in FD. Functional dyspepsia co-exists with other DGBIs, including IBS. Subtyping based on the postprandial nature of symptoms is recommended. Patients should receive a positive diagnosis. Additional testing is not routinely required before initiating therapy, except in the presence of alarm features or treatment-refractory symptoms, and can consist of upper GI endoscopy, abdominal imaging and gastric emptying testing. The consensus refuted the role of carbohydrate malabsorption testing, pyloric impedance planimetry, pH/impedance monitoring, food allergy testing and permeability testing in FD. Explanation and reassurance, also addressing lifestyle factors, represent the cornerstone of the management. Proton Pump Inhibitors are considered the firstline pharmacological treatment. With the exception of specific neuromodulators, the panel did not achieve consensus for other therapeutic options. This consensus recommends against restrictive diets, invasive endoscopic or surgical treatment, parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, spasmolytics and opioids in the management of FD.

Conclusion: A panel of Belgian experts summarised the existing evidence on the aetiology, presentation, diagnosis and treatment of FD with attention to the availability within the Belgian healthcare system. Areas of future research are identified.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica
Acta gastro-enterologica Belgica Medicine-Gastroenterology
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: The Journal Acta Gastro-Enterologica Belgica principally publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts, reviews, letters to editors, book reviews and guidelines in the field of clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology, including digestive oncology, digestive pathology, as well as nutrition. Pure animal or in vitro work will not be considered for publication in the Journal. Translational research papers (including sections of animal or in vitro work) are considered by the Journal if they have a clear relationship to or relevance for clinical hepato-gastroenterology (screening, disease mechanisms and/or new therapies). Case reports and clinical images will be accepted if they represent an important contribution to the description, the pathogenesis or the treatment of a specific gastroenterology or liver problem. The language of the Journal is English. Papers from any country will be considered for publication. Manuscripts submitted to the Journal should not have been published previously (in English or any other language), nor should they be under consideration for publication elsewhere. Unsolicited papers are peer-reviewed before it is decided whether they should be accepted, rejected, or returned for revision. Manuscripts that do not meet the presentation criteria (as indicated below) will be returned to the authors. Papers that go too far beyond the scope of the journal will be also returned to the authors by the editorial board generally within 2 weeks. The Journal reserves the right to edit the language of papers accepted for publication for clarity and correctness, and to make formal changes to ensure compliance with AGEB’s style. Authors have the opportunity to review such changes in the proofs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信