视盘囊肿的成像方式:文献回顾和提出的诊断算法。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Robin Van Compernolle, Sophie Lemmens, Catherine Cassiman
{"title":"视盘囊肿的成像方式:文献回顾和提出的诊断算法。","authors":"Robin Van Compernolle, Sophie Lemmens, Catherine Cassiman","doi":"10.1111/aos.17530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Optic disc drusen (ODD) concern highly prevalent anatomical features that are increasingly recognised as a risk factor for various pathological conditions. In clinical practice, differentiation between ODD and true papilloedema poses considerable challenges, often resulting in the effectuation of unnecessary, potentially invasive examinations. Furthermore, recent years have witnessed a notable expansion in imaging modalities employed to map ODD, primarily novel optical coherence tomography (OCT) modalities. A growing necessity arises for literature providing a profound comparison between most of the various available techniques, as well as furnishing clinicians with practical guidelines to manage a patient with suspected ODD. A comprehensive search of the current literature formed the foundation of this narrative review. We primarily focused on data from recent studies, each of which was thoroughly analysed and interpreted by all the authors. We formulate a straightforward diagnostic model to approach a patient with suspected ODD, wherein a primary distinction is made between patients with a high and low suspicion for papilloedema. Enhanced Depth Imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) emerges as the most potent modality and is thus recommended as the new gold standard technique. Fluorescein angiography exhibits excellent specificity and therefore proves useful to exclude papilloedema, although not with full certainty. Fundus autofluorescence and ultrasonography appear to be most beneficial for screening purposes and in a population with very low suspicion of papilloedema. This narrative review is the first to present a clinically relevant diagnostic model to discriminate between ODD and papilloedema, identifying EDI-OCT as the primary imaging modality in ODD diagnosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":6915,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ophthalmologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imaging modalities in optic disc drusen: A literature review and proposed diagnostic algorithm.\",\"authors\":\"Robin Van Compernolle, Sophie Lemmens, Catherine Cassiman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aos.17530\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Optic disc drusen (ODD) concern highly prevalent anatomical features that are increasingly recognised as a risk factor for various pathological conditions. In clinical practice, differentiation between ODD and true papilloedema poses considerable challenges, often resulting in the effectuation of unnecessary, potentially invasive examinations. Furthermore, recent years have witnessed a notable expansion in imaging modalities employed to map ODD, primarily novel optical coherence tomography (OCT) modalities. A growing necessity arises for literature providing a profound comparison between most of the various available techniques, as well as furnishing clinicians with practical guidelines to manage a patient with suspected ODD. A comprehensive search of the current literature formed the foundation of this narrative review. We primarily focused on data from recent studies, each of which was thoroughly analysed and interpreted by all the authors. We formulate a straightforward diagnostic model to approach a patient with suspected ODD, wherein a primary distinction is made between patients with a high and low suspicion for papilloedema. Enhanced Depth Imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) emerges as the most potent modality and is thus recommended as the new gold standard technique. Fluorescein angiography exhibits excellent specificity and therefore proves useful to exclude papilloedema, although not with full certainty. Fundus autofluorescence and ultrasonography appear to be most beneficial for screening purposes and in a population with very low suspicion of papilloedema. This narrative review is the first to present a clinically relevant diagnostic model to discriminate between ODD and papilloedema, identifying EDI-OCT as the primary imaging modality in ODD diagnosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6915,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Ophthalmologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17530\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ophthalmologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.17530","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

视盘囊肿(ODD)涉及高度普遍的解剖特征,越来越被认为是各种病理条件的危险因素。在临床实践中,区分ODD和真正的乳头状水肿带来了相当大的挑战,常常导致实施不必要的、潜在侵入性的检查。此外,近年来已经见证了用于绘制ODD的成像模式的显著扩展,主要是新型光学相干断层扫描(OCT)模式。越来越多的文献需要对大多数可用技术进行深入的比较,并为临床医生提供管理疑似ODD患者的实用指南。对当前文献的全面搜索形成了这一叙事评论的基础。我们主要关注最近研究的数据,每项研究都经过了所有作者的彻底分析和解释。我们制定了一个直截了当的诊断模型来接近疑似ODD的患者,其中主要区分乳头状水肿高怀疑和低怀疑的患者。增强深度成像OCT (EDI-OCT)作为最有效的方式出现,因此被推荐为新的金标准技术。荧光素血管造影具有很好的特异性,因此可用于排除乳头状水肿,尽管不能完全确定。眼底自身荧光和超声检查似乎是最有益的筛查目的,在人群中非常低的怀疑乳头状水肿。本文首次提出了一种临床相关的诊断模型来区分ODD和乳头状水肿,并将EDI-OCT确定为ODD诊断的主要成像方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imaging modalities in optic disc drusen: A literature review and proposed diagnostic algorithm.

Optic disc drusen (ODD) concern highly prevalent anatomical features that are increasingly recognised as a risk factor for various pathological conditions. In clinical practice, differentiation between ODD and true papilloedema poses considerable challenges, often resulting in the effectuation of unnecessary, potentially invasive examinations. Furthermore, recent years have witnessed a notable expansion in imaging modalities employed to map ODD, primarily novel optical coherence tomography (OCT) modalities. A growing necessity arises for literature providing a profound comparison between most of the various available techniques, as well as furnishing clinicians with practical guidelines to manage a patient with suspected ODD. A comprehensive search of the current literature formed the foundation of this narrative review. We primarily focused on data from recent studies, each of which was thoroughly analysed and interpreted by all the authors. We formulate a straightforward diagnostic model to approach a patient with suspected ODD, wherein a primary distinction is made between patients with a high and low suspicion for papilloedema. Enhanced Depth Imaging OCT (EDI-OCT) emerges as the most potent modality and is thus recommended as the new gold standard technique. Fluorescein angiography exhibits excellent specificity and therefore proves useful to exclude papilloedema, although not with full certainty. Fundus autofluorescence and ultrasonography appear to be most beneficial for screening purposes and in a population with very low suspicion of papilloedema. This narrative review is the first to present a clinically relevant diagnostic model to discriminate between ODD and papilloedema, identifying EDI-OCT as the primary imaging modality in ODD diagnosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Ophthalmologica
Acta Ophthalmologica 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
433
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Acta Ophthalmologica is published on behalf of the Acta Ophthalmologica Scandinavica Foundation and is the official scientific publication of the following societies: The Danish Ophthalmological Society, The Finnish Ophthalmological Society, The Icelandic Ophthalmological Society, The Norwegian Ophthalmological Society and The Swedish Ophthalmological Society, and also the European Association for Vision and Eye Research (EVER). Acta Ophthalmologica publishes clinical and experimental original articles, reviews, editorials, educational photo essays (Diagnosis and Therapy in Ophthalmology), case reports and case series, letters to the editor and doctoral theses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信