基于有效因子的城市化对雨水径流的影响及其管理。

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Mohammadhossein Farhangi, Mojtaba Hiteh, Hooshyar Yousefyani, Melika Yavari Nia, Mojtaba Tahmasebi, Mohsen Yavary Nia
{"title":"基于有效因子的城市化对雨水径流的影响及其管理。","authors":"Mohammadhossein Farhangi, Mojtaba Hiteh, Hooshyar Yousefyani, Melika Yavari Nia, Mojtaba Tahmasebi, Mohsen Yavary Nia","doi":"10.1007/s40201-025-00944-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Land-use has an important effect on the generation of stormwater runoff, and the expansion of urbanization can intensify these conditions and its health and environmental consequences. This study was focused on the urban impact on the Seveso watershed, Italy. The objectives included quantify the effect of urbanization on the generation of stormwater runoff, and choosing the optimum management scenario based on control and prevention variables. Accordingly, the runoff was evaluated based on the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve number (CN) method (SCS-CN) by a time series study of four-year precipitation data. Four scenarios were defined based on the available runoff management methods and compared economically. The CN value in the studied polygons was in the range of 62-80, while it was 30-88 based on the soil type. The estimated runoff for the entire study area was 203677103.8 m<sup>3</sup>, and the most intense runoff caused by rainfall events was 12263398.5 m<sup>3</sup>. The highest runoff volume contribution (more than 70%) corresponds to industrial and commercial areas. The retention tanks method was not significant effect on flood reduction and increased the environmental risk in the studied scenarios. However, using the sustainable urban drainage system method led to control the environmental risk in the dual method scenario and reduced the volume of stormwater by 30%. It is useful to use combined methods to reduce, control, and treatment of urban stormwater based on volume flow analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":628,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","volume":"23 1","pages":"19"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149083/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consequences of urbanization on stormwater runoff and its management based on effective factors to choose the optimum scenario.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammadhossein Farhangi, Mojtaba Hiteh, Hooshyar Yousefyani, Melika Yavari Nia, Mojtaba Tahmasebi, Mohsen Yavary Nia\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40201-025-00944-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Land-use has an important effect on the generation of stormwater runoff, and the expansion of urbanization can intensify these conditions and its health and environmental consequences. This study was focused on the urban impact on the Seveso watershed, Italy. The objectives included quantify the effect of urbanization on the generation of stormwater runoff, and choosing the optimum management scenario based on control and prevention variables. Accordingly, the runoff was evaluated based on the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve number (CN) method (SCS-CN) by a time series study of four-year precipitation data. Four scenarios were defined based on the available runoff management methods and compared economically. The CN value in the studied polygons was in the range of 62-80, while it was 30-88 based on the soil type. The estimated runoff for the entire study area was 203677103.8 m<sup>3</sup>, and the most intense runoff caused by rainfall events was 12263398.5 m<sup>3</sup>. The highest runoff volume contribution (more than 70%) corresponds to industrial and commercial areas. The retention tanks method was not significant effect on flood reduction and increased the environmental risk in the studied scenarios. However, using the sustainable urban drainage system method led to control the environmental risk in the dual method scenario and reduced the volume of stormwater by 30%. It is useful to use combined methods to reduce, control, and treatment of urban stormwater based on volume flow analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149083/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-025-00944-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-025-00944-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土地利用对雨水径流的产生有重要影响,城市化的扩大会加剧这些条件及其对健康和环境的影响。本研究的重点是城市对意大利塞韦索流域的影响。目标包括量化城市化对雨水径流产生的影响,并根据控制和预防变量选择最佳管理方案。基于土壤保持服务(SCS)曲线数法(SCS-CN),通过对4年降水资料的时间序列研究,对径流进行了评价。在现有径流管理方法的基础上定义了四种方案,并进行了经济比较。研究多边形的CN值在62 ~ 80之间,不同土壤类型的CN值在30 ~ 88之间。估算整个研究区径流量为203677103.8 m3,其中降雨事件引起的最强径流量为12263398.5 m3。最大的径流量贡献(超过70%)对应于工业和商业区域。在研究的情景中,蓄水池方法对洪水的减少效果不显著,并且增加了环境风险。然而,采用可持续城市排水系统方法可以控制双方法情景下的环境风险,并使雨水量减少30%。在容积流分析的基础上,采用综合方法来减少、控制和处理城市雨水是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Consequences of urbanization on stormwater runoff and its management based on effective factors to choose the optimum scenario.

Land-use has an important effect on the generation of stormwater runoff, and the expansion of urbanization can intensify these conditions and its health and environmental consequences. This study was focused on the urban impact on the Seveso watershed, Italy. The objectives included quantify the effect of urbanization on the generation of stormwater runoff, and choosing the optimum management scenario based on control and prevention variables. Accordingly, the runoff was evaluated based on the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) curve number (CN) method (SCS-CN) by a time series study of four-year precipitation data. Four scenarios were defined based on the available runoff management methods and compared economically. The CN value in the studied polygons was in the range of 62-80, while it was 30-88 based on the soil type. The estimated runoff for the entire study area was 203677103.8 m3, and the most intense runoff caused by rainfall events was 12263398.5 m3. The highest runoff volume contribution (more than 70%) corresponds to industrial and commercial areas. The retention tanks method was not significant effect on flood reduction and increased the environmental risk in the studied scenarios. However, using the sustainable urban drainage system method led to control the environmental risk in the dual method scenario and reduced the volume of stormwater by 30%. It is useful to use combined methods to reduce, control, and treatment of urban stormwater based on volume flow analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering
Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL-ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: Journal of Environmental Health Science & Engineering is a peer-reviewed journal presenting timely research on all aspects of environmental health science, engineering and management. A broad outline of the journal''s scope includes: -Water pollution and treatment -Wastewater treatment and reuse -Air control -Soil remediation -Noise and radiation control -Environmental biotechnology and nanotechnology -Food safety and hygiene
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信