两种蚂蚁在食物探测中附属物的不对称使用

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ethology Pub Date : 2025-04-24 DOI:10.1111/eth.13570
Alexandra Koch, Hassina Nawal, Henrique Galante, Laure-Anne Poissonnier
{"title":"两种蚂蚁在食物探测中附属物的不对称使用","authors":"Alexandra Koch,&nbsp;Hassina Nawal,&nbsp;Henrique Galante,&nbsp;Laure-Anne Poissonnier","doi":"10.1111/eth.13570","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Lateralization, or the presence of left–right asymmetry, is a widespread phenomenon in vertebrates and has been shown to confer various adaptive advantages, as lateralized individuals tend to outperform non-lateralized ones in specific tasks. In contrast, much less is known about lateralization in invertebrates. Further investigation into lateralization in understudied invertebrate groups is crucial for deepening our understanding of its evolutionary origins. In this study, we evaluated asymmetries during food probing behaviors in two ant species, <i>Lasius niger</i> and <i>Linepithema humile</i>. Overall, both species exhibited asymmetries, favoring either a particular leg or antenna when investigating a sugar drop. Interestingly, <i>L. niger</i> favored the right side, while <i>L. humile</i> favored their left. These results imply the absence of a strong driver for a bias on a specific side preference for food probing in ants, but a potential benefit of lateralization in food probing. Supporting this, individuals fully lateralized on the opposite side of the majority were observed in both species. The collective bias found in both species supports the theory that population-level lateralization may have evolved in species that need to coordinate their behaviors. This study provides novel insights into the lateralization of ant behaviors and highlights the need for further research into its evolutionary drivers.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13570","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetrical Use of Appendages in Food Probing by Two Ant Species\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Koch,&nbsp;Hassina Nawal,&nbsp;Henrique Galante,&nbsp;Laure-Anne Poissonnier\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eth.13570\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Lateralization, or the presence of left–right asymmetry, is a widespread phenomenon in vertebrates and has been shown to confer various adaptive advantages, as lateralized individuals tend to outperform non-lateralized ones in specific tasks. In contrast, much less is known about lateralization in invertebrates. Further investigation into lateralization in understudied invertebrate groups is crucial for deepening our understanding of its evolutionary origins. In this study, we evaluated asymmetries during food probing behaviors in two ant species, <i>Lasius niger</i> and <i>Linepithema humile</i>. Overall, both species exhibited asymmetries, favoring either a particular leg or antenna when investigating a sugar drop. Interestingly, <i>L. niger</i> favored the right side, while <i>L. humile</i> favored their left. These results imply the absence of a strong driver for a bias on a specific side preference for food probing in ants, but a potential benefit of lateralization in food probing. Supporting this, individuals fully lateralized on the opposite side of the majority were observed in both species. The collective bias found in both species supports the theory that population-level lateralization may have evolved in species that need to coordinate their behaviors. This study provides novel insights into the lateralization of ant behaviors and highlights the need for further research into its evolutionary drivers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethology\",\"volume\":\"131 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13570\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13570\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13570","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

侧化,或左右不对称的存在,是脊椎动物中普遍存在的现象,并已被证明具有各种适应优势,因为侧化的个体往往在特定任务中表现优于非侧化的个体。相比之下,我们对无脊椎动物的侧化知之甚少。进一步研究未被充分研究的无脊椎动物群体的侧化对于加深我们对其进化起源的理解至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了两种蚂蚁——黑蚁和矮蚁——在食物探测行为中的不对称性。总的来说,这两个物种都表现出不对称性,在研究糖滴时偏爱特定的腿或天线。有趣的是,黑乳杆菌偏爱右侧,而矮乳杆菌偏爱左侧。这些结果表明,在蚂蚁的食物探测中,缺乏对特定侧偏好的强烈驱动,但在食物探测中,偏侧化有潜在的好处。支持这一点的是,在这两个物种中都观察到大多数人的另一侧完全侧化。在这两个物种中发现的集体偏见支持了种群水平的偏侧化可能在需要协调行为的物种中进化出来的理论。这项研究为蚂蚁行为的偏侧化提供了新的见解,并强调了进一步研究其进化驱动因素的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Asymmetrical Use of Appendages in Food Probing by Two Ant Species

Asymmetrical Use of Appendages in Food Probing by Two Ant Species

Lateralization, or the presence of left–right asymmetry, is a widespread phenomenon in vertebrates and has been shown to confer various adaptive advantages, as lateralized individuals tend to outperform non-lateralized ones in specific tasks. In contrast, much less is known about lateralization in invertebrates. Further investigation into lateralization in understudied invertebrate groups is crucial for deepening our understanding of its evolutionary origins. In this study, we evaluated asymmetries during food probing behaviors in two ant species, Lasius niger and Linepithema humile. Overall, both species exhibited asymmetries, favoring either a particular leg or antenna when investigating a sugar drop. Interestingly, L. niger favored the right side, while L. humile favored their left. These results imply the absence of a strong driver for a bias on a specific side preference for food probing in ants, but a potential benefit of lateralization in food probing. Supporting this, individuals fully lateralized on the opposite side of the majority were observed in both species. The collective bias found in both species supports the theory that population-level lateralization may have evolved in species that need to coordinate their behaviors. This study provides novel insights into the lateralization of ant behaviors and highlights the need for further research into its evolutionary drivers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信