自由放养家猫群体食物分布和亲缘关系对社会互动的影响

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Ethology Pub Date : 2025-03-31 DOI:10.1111/eth.13564
Nancy G. Solomon, Tanner Scheetz, Shelby McCay, Thomas O. Crist, Brian Keane
{"title":"自由放养家猫群体食物分布和亲缘关系对社会互动的影响","authors":"Nancy G. Solomon,&nbsp;Tanner Scheetz,&nbsp;Shelby McCay,&nbsp;Thomas O. Crist,&nbsp;Brian Keane","doi":"10.1111/eth.13564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Behavioral interactions form the basis of social structure within populations. Ecological, demographic, and social factors may affect types of interactions or which individuals spend time near each other. For example, food resource distribution can affect social interactions and, if food resources are clumped, may result in interindividual competition. Social interactions also may be influenced by relatedness since close relatives may engage in more affiliative behaviors with one another because these behaviors may increase their inclusive fitness. We examined the influence of food distribution and relatedness on behavioral interactions in a colony of free-roaming domestic cats (<i>Felis catus</i>). Supplemental cat food was presented in a dispersed or clumped manner, and individuals were genotyped at 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci to determine relatedness. We observed the frequency of affiliative, agonistic, and investigatory behaviors and the number of times that individuals were in proximity to each other for 20 adults. We calculated three network metrics to quantify network structure: mean weighted degree, mean eigenvector centrality, and network density. Mean weighted degree and mean eigenvalue centrality were significantly non-random in both the dispersed and clumped food treatments for affiliative behavior. Network metrics for agonistic and investigative behaviors did not differ from random expectations in dispersed or clumped treatments. Network metrics increased between dispersed and clumped food treatments for affiliative but not agonistic or investigative behaviors. All three network metrics for proximity were significantly non-random in the dispersed and clumped treatments and increased between clumped and dispersed food treatments. There was no effect of genetic relatedness on any behavior or proximity, but sex was more important. Same-sex individuals were less likely to have agonistic behaviors when food was dispersed. These results suggest that some cats displayed affiliative behavior toward a subset of conspecific colony members as well as being in closer proximity to some individuals than others.</p>","PeriodicalId":50494,"journal":{"name":"Ethology","volume":"131 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13564","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Food Distribution and Relatedness on Social Interactions in a Colony of Free-Ranging Domestic Cats (Felis catus)\",\"authors\":\"Nancy G. Solomon,&nbsp;Tanner Scheetz,&nbsp;Shelby McCay,&nbsp;Thomas O. Crist,&nbsp;Brian Keane\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/eth.13564\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Behavioral interactions form the basis of social structure within populations. Ecological, demographic, and social factors may affect types of interactions or which individuals spend time near each other. For example, food resource distribution can affect social interactions and, if food resources are clumped, may result in interindividual competition. Social interactions also may be influenced by relatedness since close relatives may engage in more affiliative behaviors with one another because these behaviors may increase their inclusive fitness. We examined the influence of food distribution and relatedness on behavioral interactions in a colony of free-roaming domestic cats (<i>Felis catus</i>). Supplemental cat food was presented in a dispersed or clumped manner, and individuals were genotyped at 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci to determine relatedness. We observed the frequency of affiliative, agonistic, and investigatory behaviors and the number of times that individuals were in proximity to each other for 20 adults. We calculated three network metrics to quantify network structure: mean weighted degree, mean eigenvector centrality, and network density. Mean weighted degree and mean eigenvalue centrality were significantly non-random in both the dispersed and clumped food treatments for affiliative behavior. Network metrics for agonistic and investigative behaviors did not differ from random expectations in dispersed or clumped treatments. Network metrics increased between dispersed and clumped food treatments for affiliative but not agonistic or investigative behaviors. All three network metrics for proximity were significantly non-random in the dispersed and clumped treatments and increased between clumped and dispersed food treatments. There was no effect of genetic relatedness on any behavior or proximity, but sex was more important. Same-sex individuals were less likely to have agonistic behaviors when food was dispersed. These results suggest that some cats displayed affiliative behavior toward a subset of conspecific colony members as well as being in closer proximity to some individuals than others.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50494,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethology\",\"volume\":\"131 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/eth.13564\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13564\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/eth.13564","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行为的相互作用构成了群体内社会结构的基础。生态、人口和社会因素可能会影响互动的类型,或者影响个体在彼此附近花费的时间。例如,食物资源的分配会影响社会互动,如果食物资源集中,可能会导致个体间的竞争。社会互动也可能受到亲缘关系的影响,因为近亲之间可能会有更多的附属行为,因为这些行为可能会增加他们的包容适应性。我们在一群自由漫游的家猫(Felis catus)中研究了食物分布和亲缘关系对行为互动的影响。添加猫粮以分散或块状的方式呈现,并在10个多态性微卫星位点上对个体进行基因分型以确定相关性。我们观察了20个成年人的亲和行为、敌对行为和调查行为的频率以及个体彼此接近的次数。我们计算了三个网络指标来量化网络结构:平均加权度、平均特征向量中心性和网络密度。在分散和块状食物处理中,亲和行为的平均加权度和平均特征值中心性显著非随机。在分散或聚集治疗中,激动性和调查性行为的网络指标与随机预期没有差异。网络指标增加了分散和聚集的食物处理之间的隶属关系,但没有拮抗或调查行为。在分散和块状处理中,所有三个接近性网络指标都具有显著的非随机性,并且在块状和分散的食物处理之间增加。遗传亲缘关系对任何行为或亲近程度都没有影响,但性别更重要。当食物分散时,同性个体不太可能产生竞争行为。这些结果表明,一些猫对同一群体成员的一个子集表现出亲和行为,并且与一些个体比其他个体更接近。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Influence of Food Distribution and Relatedness on Social Interactions in a Colony of Free-Ranging Domestic Cats (Felis catus)

Influence of Food Distribution and Relatedness on Social Interactions in a Colony of Free-Ranging Domestic Cats (Felis catus)

Behavioral interactions form the basis of social structure within populations. Ecological, demographic, and social factors may affect types of interactions or which individuals spend time near each other. For example, food resource distribution can affect social interactions and, if food resources are clumped, may result in interindividual competition. Social interactions also may be influenced by relatedness since close relatives may engage in more affiliative behaviors with one another because these behaviors may increase their inclusive fitness. We examined the influence of food distribution and relatedness on behavioral interactions in a colony of free-roaming domestic cats (Felis catus). Supplemental cat food was presented in a dispersed or clumped manner, and individuals were genotyped at 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci to determine relatedness. We observed the frequency of affiliative, agonistic, and investigatory behaviors and the number of times that individuals were in proximity to each other for 20 adults. We calculated three network metrics to quantify network structure: mean weighted degree, mean eigenvector centrality, and network density. Mean weighted degree and mean eigenvalue centrality were significantly non-random in both the dispersed and clumped food treatments for affiliative behavior. Network metrics for agonistic and investigative behaviors did not differ from random expectations in dispersed or clumped treatments. Network metrics increased between dispersed and clumped food treatments for affiliative but not agonistic or investigative behaviors. All three network metrics for proximity were significantly non-random in the dispersed and clumped treatments and increased between clumped and dispersed food treatments. There was no effect of genetic relatedness on any behavior or proximity, but sex was more important. Same-sex individuals were less likely to have agonistic behaviors when food was dispersed. These results suggest that some cats displayed affiliative behavior toward a subset of conspecific colony members as well as being in closer proximity to some individuals than others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethology
Ethology 生物-动物学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
89
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: International in scope, Ethology publishes original research on behaviour including physiological mechanisms, function, and evolution. The Journal addresses behaviour in all species, from slime moulds to humans. Experimental research is preferred, both from the field and the lab, which is grounded in a theoretical framework. The section ''Perspectives and Current Debates'' provides an overview of the field and may include theoretical investigations and essays on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信