改进亚太赫兹器件的片上特性:探针影响和串扰研究

IF 4.5 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Jerome Cheron;Nicholas C. Miller;Antonio Crespo;Dylan F. Williams;Rob D. Jones;Michael Elliott;Jeffrey A. Jargon;Ryan Gilbert;Benjamin F. Jamroz;Jason Shell;Bryan T. Bosworth;Edward Gebara;Nicholas R. Jungwirth;Peter H. Aaen;Christian J. Long;Nathan D. Orloff;James C. Booth;Ari D. Feldman
{"title":"改进亚太赫兹器件的片上特性:探针影响和串扰研究","authors":"Jerome Cheron;Nicholas C. Miller;Antonio Crespo;Dylan F. Williams;Rob D. Jones;Michael Elliott;Jeffrey A. Jargon;Ryan Gilbert;Benjamin F. Jamroz;Jason Shell;Bryan T. Bosworth;Edward Gebara;Nicholas R. Jungwirth;Peter H. Aaen;Christian J. Long;Nathan D. Orloff;James C. Booth;Ari D. Feldman","doi":"10.1109/TMTT.2025.3550095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We evaluate the accuracy of small-signal on-wafer device characterization in the sub-THz frequency range when employing conventional and advanced calibration methods with state-of-the-art design of on-chip standards. We report that major discrepancies resulting from an interlaboratory comparison experiment are mainly attributed to the influence of microwave probes. When performing conventional multiline thru-reflect-line (mTRL) calibrations with six different models of probe from 140 to 325 GHz, we observe significant variations in the measured scattering-parameters (S-parameters) and show that probes made by various manufacturers induce disparate crosstalk responses that vary between −70 and −15 dB on open-open standards. After applying a crosstalk correction approach as a second-tier calibration, we obtain significantly better agreement between the RF performance of the same heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT) measured with two different probe models. While the difference between the maximum stable gain (MSG) reaches 1.8 dB at 210 GHz after applying a conventional mTRL calibration, we reduce the error to ~0.5 dB after crosstalk correction. This study shows that crosstalk correction methods must be implemented in the sub-THz frequency range to accurately estimate the RF performance of active devices and circuits.","PeriodicalId":13272,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques","volume":"73 6","pages":"3144-3155"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving On-Wafer Characterization of Sub-THz Devices: A Probe Influence and Crosstalk Study\",\"authors\":\"Jerome Cheron;Nicholas C. Miller;Antonio Crespo;Dylan F. Williams;Rob D. Jones;Michael Elliott;Jeffrey A. Jargon;Ryan Gilbert;Benjamin F. Jamroz;Jason Shell;Bryan T. Bosworth;Edward Gebara;Nicholas R. Jungwirth;Peter H. Aaen;Christian J. Long;Nathan D. Orloff;James C. Booth;Ari D. Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/TMTT.2025.3550095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We evaluate the accuracy of small-signal on-wafer device characterization in the sub-THz frequency range when employing conventional and advanced calibration methods with state-of-the-art design of on-chip standards. We report that major discrepancies resulting from an interlaboratory comparison experiment are mainly attributed to the influence of microwave probes. When performing conventional multiline thru-reflect-line (mTRL) calibrations with six different models of probe from 140 to 325 GHz, we observe significant variations in the measured scattering-parameters (S-parameters) and show that probes made by various manufacturers induce disparate crosstalk responses that vary between −70 and −15 dB on open-open standards. After applying a crosstalk correction approach as a second-tier calibration, we obtain significantly better agreement between the RF performance of the same heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT) measured with two different probe models. While the difference between the maximum stable gain (MSG) reaches 1.8 dB at 210 GHz after applying a conventional mTRL calibration, we reduce the error to ~0.5 dB after crosstalk correction. This study shows that crosstalk correction methods must be implemented in the sub-THz frequency range to accurately estimate the RF performance of active devices and circuits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13272,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques\",\"volume\":\"73 6\",\"pages\":\"3144-3155\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10937123/\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10937123/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当采用传统和先进的校准方法以及最先进的片上标准设计时,我们评估了亚太赫兹频率范围内小信号片上器件表征的准确性。我们报告了实验室间比较实验产生的主要差异主要归因于微波探针的影响。当使用140至325 GHz的六种不同型号的探头进行传统的多线通反射线(mTRL)校准时,我们观察到测量的散射参数(s参数)存在显着变化,并表明不同制造商生产的探头在开放-开放标准下诱导不同的串扰响应在- 70至- 15 dB之间变化。在采用串扰校正方法作为第二层校准后,我们获得了用两种不同探针模型测量的相同异质结双极晶体管(HBT)的射频性能之间的一致性。在210 GHz时,采用传统的mTRL校准后,最大稳定增益(MSG)之间的差异达到1.8 dB,而在串扰校正后,我们将误差降低到~0.5 dB。研究表明,为了准确估计有源器件和电路的射频性能,必须在亚太赫兹频率范围内实施串扰校正方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving On-Wafer Characterization of Sub-THz Devices: A Probe Influence and Crosstalk Study
We evaluate the accuracy of small-signal on-wafer device characterization in the sub-THz frequency range when employing conventional and advanced calibration methods with state-of-the-art design of on-chip standards. We report that major discrepancies resulting from an interlaboratory comparison experiment are mainly attributed to the influence of microwave probes. When performing conventional multiline thru-reflect-line (mTRL) calibrations with six different models of probe from 140 to 325 GHz, we observe significant variations in the measured scattering-parameters (S-parameters) and show that probes made by various manufacturers induce disparate crosstalk responses that vary between −70 and −15 dB on open-open standards. After applying a crosstalk correction approach as a second-tier calibration, we obtain significantly better agreement between the RF performance of the same heterojunction bipolar transistor (HBT) measured with two different probe models. While the difference between the maximum stable gain (MSG) reaches 1.8 dB at 210 GHz after applying a conventional mTRL calibration, we reduce the error to ~0.5 dB after crosstalk correction. This study shows that crosstalk correction methods must be implemented in the sub-THz frequency range to accurately estimate the RF performance of active devices and circuits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques
IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
18.60%
发文量
486
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques focuses on that part of engineering and theory associated with microwave/millimeter-wave components, devices, circuits, and systems involving the generation, modulation, demodulation, control, transmission, and detection of microwave signals. This includes scientific, technical, and industrial, activities. Microwave theory and techniques relates to electromagnetic waves usually in the frequency region between a few MHz and a THz; other spectral regions and wave types are included within the scope of the Society whenever basic microwave theory and techniques can yield useful results. Generally, this occurs in the theory of wave propagation in structures with dimensions comparable to a wavelength, and in the related techniques for analysis and design.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信