植被绿化对北半球生态系统恢复力的增强作用不显著

IF 7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Jingjing Zhang , Xingming Hao , Yongchang Liu , Xuewei Li , Qixiang Liang , Fan Sun , Mengtao Ci , Yupeng Li
{"title":"植被绿化对北半球生态系统恢复力的增强作用不显著","authors":"Jingjing Zhang ,&nbsp;Xingming Hao ,&nbsp;Yongchang Liu ,&nbsp;Xuewei Li ,&nbsp;Qixiang Liang ,&nbsp;Fan Sun ,&nbsp;Mengtao Ci ,&nbsp;Yupeng Li","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Greening is asynchronous with ecosystem resilience in the context of vegetation restoration, thus highlighting the uncertainty in predicting the future sustainability of ecosystems. However, global evidence, to validate this inconsistency, remains limited. Here, we integrated Global Inventory Monitoring and Modeling Studies (GIMMS), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and global Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (GOSIF) multisource vegetation indices with a random forest model to demonstrate how resilience in Eurasia quantified using critical slowing down indicators has changed during 1984–2020. Resilience estimates derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), kernel NDVI (kNDVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), Gross Primary Production (GPP), and GOSIF exhibited similar spatial patterns and trends. Specifically, resilience was lower in water-limited regions and increased with higher aridity index values; it peaked in humid regions (AI &gt; 0.65), with average values (quantified by <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>λ</mi><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>C</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>) ranging from −2.20 to −2.00. While vegetation cover showed a general increasing trend, resilience simultaneously declined, particularly in semi-humid areas. Significant shifts in resilience trends occurred around 2005. Warming and variability in water conditions were identified as the main reasons for the decline in resilience in humid and arid regions, respectively. After the transition point, mean temperature contributed 28.8 %, 41.7 %, and 21.6 % to resilience in the arid, semi-arid, and humid zones, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights for comprehending and assessing the ecological impacts of global and regional climate change mitigation efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11459,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Indicators","volume":"177 ","pages":"Article 113762"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vegetation greening does not significantly enhance ecosystem resilience in the Northern Hemisphere\",\"authors\":\"Jingjing Zhang ,&nbsp;Xingming Hao ,&nbsp;Yongchang Liu ,&nbsp;Xuewei Li ,&nbsp;Qixiang Liang ,&nbsp;Fan Sun ,&nbsp;Mengtao Ci ,&nbsp;Yupeng Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Greening is asynchronous with ecosystem resilience in the context of vegetation restoration, thus highlighting the uncertainty in predicting the future sustainability of ecosystems. However, global evidence, to validate this inconsistency, remains limited. Here, we integrated Global Inventory Monitoring and Modeling Studies (GIMMS), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and global Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (GOSIF) multisource vegetation indices with a random forest model to demonstrate how resilience in Eurasia quantified using critical slowing down indicators has changed during 1984–2020. Resilience estimates derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), kernel NDVI (kNDVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), Gross Primary Production (GPP), and GOSIF exhibited similar spatial patterns and trends. Specifically, resilience was lower in water-limited regions and increased with higher aridity index values; it peaked in humid regions (AI &gt; 0.65), with average values (quantified by <span><math><mrow><msub><mi>λ</mi><mrow><mi>A</mi><mi>C</mi><mn>1</mn></mrow></msub></mrow></math></span>) ranging from −2.20 to −2.00. While vegetation cover showed a general increasing trend, resilience simultaneously declined, particularly in semi-humid areas. Significant shifts in resilience trends occurred around 2005. Warming and variability in water conditions were identified as the main reasons for the decline in resilience in humid and arid regions, respectively. After the transition point, mean temperature contributed 28.8 %, 41.7 %, and 21.6 % to resilience in the arid, semi-arid, and humid zones, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights for comprehending and assessing the ecological impacts of global and regional climate change mitigation efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"volume\":\"177 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Indicators\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25006922\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Indicators","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1470160X25006922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在植被恢复的背景下,绿化与生态系统恢复力是不同步的,因此,在预测生态系统未来可持续性时,突出了不确定性。然而,证实这种不一致的全球证据仍然有限。在这里,我们将全球库存监测和建模研究(GIMMS)、中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)和全球轨道碳观测站-2太阳诱导叶绿素荧光(GOSIF)多源植被指数与随机森林模型相结合,展示了1984-2020年间欧亚大陆恢复能力的变化情况。归一化植被指数(NDVI)、核NDVI (kNDVI)、叶面积指数(LAI)、初级生产总值(GPP)和GOSIF的复原力估算结果显示出相似的空间格局和趋势。具体而言,在缺水地区,恢复力较低,随着干旱指数值的增加而增加;它在潮湿地区达到顶峰(AI >;0.65),平均值(以λAC1量化)在−2.20 ~−2.00之间。虽然植被覆盖总体呈增加趋势,但恢复力同时下降,特别是在半湿润地区。2005年前后,恢复力趋势发生了重大变化。气候变暖和水条件的变化分别被确定为潮湿和干旱地区恢复力下降的主要原因。在过渡点之后,平均温度对干旱区、半干旱区和湿润区恢复力的贡献率分别为28.8%、41.7%和21.6%。这些发现为理解和评估全球和区域减缓气候变化努力的生态影响提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vegetation greening does not significantly enhance ecosystem resilience in the Northern Hemisphere
Greening is asynchronous with ecosystem resilience in the context of vegetation restoration, thus highlighting the uncertainty in predicting the future sustainability of ecosystems. However, global evidence, to validate this inconsistency, remains limited. Here, we integrated Global Inventory Monitoring and Modeling Studies (GIMMS), Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), and global Orbiting Carbon Observatory-2 Solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (GOSIF) multisource vegetation indices with a random forest model to demonstrate how resilience in Eurasia quantified using critical slowing down indicators has changed during 1984–2020. Resilience estimates derived from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), kernel NDVI (kNDVI), Leaf Area Index (LAI), Gross Primary Production (GPP), and GOSIF exhibited similar spatial patterns and trends. Specifically, resilience was lower in water-limited regions and increased with higher aridity index values; it peaked in humid regions (AI > 0.65), with average values (quantified by λAC1) ranging from −2.20 to −2.00. While vegetation cover showed a general increasing trend, resilience simultaneously declined, particularly in semi-humid areas. Significant shifts in resilience trends occurred around 2005. Warming and variability in water conditions were identified as the main reasons for the decline in resilience in humid and arid regions, respectively. After the transition point, mean temperature contributed 28.8 %, 41.7 %, and 21.6 % to resilience in the arid, semi-arid, and humid zones, respectively. These findings provide valuable insights for comprehending and assessing the ecological impacts of global and regional climate change mitigation efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Indicators
Ecological Indicators 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
11.80
自引率
8.70%
发文量
1163
审稿时长
78 days
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Ecological Indicators is to integrate the monitoring and assessment of ecological and environmental indicators with management practices. The journal provides a forum for the discussion of the applied scientific development and review of traditional indicator approaches as well as for theoretical, modelling and quantitative applications such as index development. Research into the following areas will be published. • All aspects of ecological and environmental indicators and indices. • New indicators, and new approaches and methods for indicator development, testing and use. • Development and modelling of indices, e.g. application of indicator suites across multiple scales and resources. • Analysis and research of resource, system- and scale-specific indicators. • Methods for integration of social and other valuation metrics for the production of scientifically rigorous and politically-relevant assessments using indicator-based monitoring and assessment programs. • How research indicators can be transformed into direct application for management purposes. • Broader assessment objectives and methods, e.g. biodiversity, biological integrity, and sustainability, through the use of indicators. • Resource-specific indicators such as landscape, agroecosystems, forests, wetlands, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信