主成分分析法与分形分析法在空高铁联运网络评价中的比较

IF 4.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 BUSINESS
Mengyuan Lu , Edgar Jimenez Perez , Keith Mason , Linlin Li
{"title":"主成分分析法与分形分析法在空高铁联运网络评价中的比较","authors":"Mengyuan Lu ,&nbsp;Edgar Jimenez Perez ,&nbsp;Keith Mason ,&nbsp;Linlin Li","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101435","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The importance of air transport and high-speed rail (HSR) in building comprehensive transportation systems has grown substantially in recent years. Evaluating the air-HSR intermodal network is essential in identifying the developmental hurdles and charting a course for its progress. This paper compares alternative methods for evaluating the performance of air-high-speed rail (HSR) intermodal networks, with a focus on developing a comprehensive index framework that considers multiple perspectives. Ten Chinese cities with viable air-HSR connectivity are assessed using principal component analysis (PCA) and Fractal Analysis. The study finds that while PCA provides a valuable high-level overview of air-HSR intermodal network integration by identifying major trends and key components, Fractal Analysis offers a complementary and more detailed evaluation by capturing local characteristics and complex spatial interactions. The combined use of PCA and Fractal Analysis ensures a comprehensive assessment, highlighting that Fractal Analysis is particularly effective for evaluating complex intermodal networks when spatial coherence and local variations are critical. The analysis provides decision-makers with a more balanced understanding of the intricate interrelationships between various aspects of the air-HSR intermodal network, which can inform policy decisions related to transportation infrastructure investment and development.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"62 ","pages":"Article 101435"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of PCA and fractal analysis approaches in the evaluation of air-HSR intermodal network\",\"authors\":\"Mengyuan Lu ,&nbsp;Edgar Jimenez Perez ,&nbsp;Keith Mason ,&nbsp;Linlin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rtbm.2025.101435\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The importance of air transport and high-speed rail (HSR) in building comprehensive transportation systems has grown substantially in recent years. Evaluating the air-HSR intermodal network is essential in identifying the developmental hurdles and charting a course for its progress. This paper compares alternative methods for evaluating the performance of air-high-speed rail (HSR) intermodal networks, with a focus on developing a comprehensive index framework that considers multiple perspectives. Ten Chinese cities with viable air-HSR connectivity are assessed using principal component analysis (PCA) and Fractal Analysis. The study finds that while PCA provides a valuable high-level overview of air-HSR intermodal network integration by identifying major trends and key components, Fractal Analysis offers a complementary and more detailed evaluation by capturing local characteristics and complex spatial interactions. The combined use of PCA and Fractal Analysis ensures a comprehensive assessment, highlighting that Fractal Analysis is particularly effective for evaluating complex intermodal networks when spatial coherence and local variations are critical. The analysis provides decision-makers with a more balanced understanding of the intricate interrelationships between various aspects of the air-HSR intermodal network, which can inform policy decisions related to transportation infrastructure investment and development.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47453,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"volume\":\"62 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101435\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Transportation Business and Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001506\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210539525001506","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,航空运输和高铁在综合交通运输体系建设中的重要性显著提高。评估空高铁多式联运网络对于确定发展障碍和制定其进展路线至关重要。本文比较了评估空中高速铁路(HSR)多式联运网络性能的各种方法,重点是开发一个考虑多个角度的综合指标框架。采用主成分分析(PCA)和分形分析对中国10个具有空气高铁可行性的城市进行了评价。研究发现,主成分分析法通过识别主要趋势和关键组成部分,为空气-高铁多式联运网络整合提供了一个有价值的高层次概述,而分形分析法通过捕捉局部特征和复杂的空间相互作用,提供了一个互补的、更详细的评估。主成分分析和分形分析的结合使用确保了一个全面的评估,强调分形分析对评估复杂的多式联运网络特别有效,当空间一致性和局部变化是至关重要的。该分析为决策者提供了对空中高铁多式联运网络各个方面之间错综复杂的相互关系的更平衡的理解,这可以为与交通基础设施投资和发展相关的政策决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of PCA and fractal analysis approaches in the evaluation of air-HSR intermodal network
The importance of air transport and high-speed rail (HSR) in building comprehensive transportation systems has grown substantially in recent years. Evaluating the air-HSR intermodal network is essential in identifying the developmental hurdles and charting a course for its progress. This paper compares alternative methods for evaluating the performance of air-high-speed rail (HSR) intermodal networks, with a focus on developing a comprehensive index framework that considers multiple perspectives. Ten Chinese cities with viable air-HSR connectivity are assessed using principal component analysis (PCA) and Fractal Analysis. The study finds that while PCA provides a valuable high-level overview of air-HSR intermodal network integration by identifying major trends and key components, Fractal Analysis offers a complementary and more detailed evaluation by capturing local characteristics and complex spatial interactions. The combined use of PCA and Fractal Analysis ensures a comprehensive assessment, highlighting that Fractal Analysis is particularly effective for evaluating complex intermodal networks when spatial coherence and local variations are critical. The analysis provides decision-makers with a more balanced understanding of the intricate interrelationships between various aspects of the air-HSR intermodal network, which can inform policy decisions related to transportation infrastructure investment and development.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
175
期刊介绍: Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信