基于智能手机的老花眼人群加法测量的初步评估

IF 1.8 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rosa M. Salmerón-Campillo , Jose A. Diaz-Guirado , Gines Martinez-Ros , Mateusz Jaskulski , Norberto López-Gil
{"title":"基于智能手机的老花眼人群加法测量的初步评估","authors":"Rosa M. Salmerón-Campillo ,&nbsp;Jose A. Diaz-Guirado ,&nbsp;Gines Martinez-Ros ,&nbsp;Mateusz Jaskulski ,&nbsp;Norberto López-Gil","doi":"10.1016/j.optom.2025.100561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the viability and accuracy of a mobile application (app) for subjective measurement of presbyopic addition, comparing its performance with standard clinical methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty presbyopic subjects (aged 52 to 64) participated in the study. Clinical measurements of sphero-cylindrical refraction and its correction was achieved using trial lenses. Addition was also clinically measured using a standard and a tentative method. A set of 12 trial lenses ranging from 0 to 2.75 D were randomly put on top of the far distance correction, generating the correction addition correction or different levels of under/over correction of the addition. Participants then used a smartphone-based app to subjectively determine binocularly their near point (NP) using a push-up method while looking at a blue stimulus that rescaled as a function of the face-device distance measured using the front camera of the device. For each induced level of under/over correction of the addition, participants completed three measurements of their near point.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation (R² = 0.82) between app-measured and clinical addition values. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean over estimation of -0.22± 0.38 D with a limit of agreement of ±0.74 D of the near correction. Cumulative error analysis indicated that 61.7 % of app measurements were within 0.25 D of clinical values, and 82.5 % within 0.50 D</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A smartphone-based subjective measurement of presbyopic addition can potentially be used to assess the addition needed to detect the under or over corrected addition in full presbyopic subjects.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46407,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Optometry","volume":"18 3","pages":"Article 100561"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Preliminary evaluation of smartphone-based addition measurement in a presbyopic population\",\"authors\":\"Rosa M. Salmerón-Campillo ,&nbsp;Jose A. Diaz-Guirado ,&nbsp;Gines Martinez-Ros ,&nbsp;Mateusz Jaskulski ,&nbsp;Norberto López-Gil\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.optom.2025.100561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the viability and accuracy of a mobile application (app) for subjective measurement of presbyopic addition, comparing its performance with standard clinical methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Twenty presbyopic subjects (aged 52 to 64) participated in the study. Clinical measurements of sphero-cylindrical refraction and its correction was achieved using trial lenses. Addition was also clinically measured using a standard and a tentative method. A set of 12 trial lenses ranging from 0 to 2.75 D were randomly put on top of the far distance correction, generating the correction addition correction or different levels of under/over correction of the addition. Participants then used a smartphone-based app to subjectively determine binocularly their near point (NP) using a push-up method while looking at a blue stimulus that rescaled as a function of the face-device distance measured using the front camera of the device. For each induced level of under/over correction of the addition, participants completed three measurements of their near point.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation (R² = 0.82) between app-measured and clinical addition values. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean over estimation of -0.22± 0.38 D with a limit of agreement of ±0.74 D of the near correction. Cumulative error analysis indicated that 61.7 % of app measurements were within 0.25 D of clinical values, and 82.5 % within 0.50 D</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>A smartphone-based subjective measurement of presbyopic addition can potentially be used to assess the addition needed to detect the under or over corrected addition in full presbyopic subjects.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"volume\":\"18 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100561\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Optometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429625000263\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Optometry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1888429625000263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评价一种主观测量老花眼度数的移动应用程序(app)的可行性和准确性,并将其与标准临床方法进行比较。方法老花眼受试者20例,年龄52 ~ 64岁。临床测量球柱面折射和它的校正使用试验镜片。此外,还采用标准方法和试探性方法进行了临床测定。将一组12块0 ~ 2.75 D的试镜随机放置在远距校正的上方,产生校正附加校正或不同程度的附加下/上校正。然后,参与者使用一款基于智能手机的应用程序,通过俯俯撑方法主观地确定他们的近点(NP),同时观看蓝色刺激,该刺激根据面部设备的前置摄像头测量的距离重新缩放。对于每个诱导水平下/超过修正的添加,参与者完成三次测量他们的近点。结果经线性回归分析,app测量值与临床增加值具有较强的相关性(R²= 0.82)。Bland-Altman分析显示,平均过估计为-0.22±0.38 D,接近校正的一致性限制为±0.74 D。累积误差分析显示,61.7%的app测量值与临床值在0.25 D范围内,82.5%的app测量值在0.50 D范围内。结论基于智能手机的老花眼度数主观测量可用于评估检测完全老花眼患者度数不足或过度矫正所需的度数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Preliminary evaluation of smartphone-based addition measurement in a presbyopic population

Purpose

To evaluate the viability and accuracy of a mobile application (app) for subjective measurement of presbyopic addition, comparing its performance with standard clinical methods.

Methods

Twenty presbyopic subjects (aged 52 to 64) participated in the study. Clinical measurements of sphero-cylindrical refraction and its correction was achieved using trial lenses. Addition was also clinically measured using a standard and a tentative method. A set of 12 trial lenses ranging from 0 to 2.75 D were randomly put on top of the far distance correction, generating the correction addition correction or different levels of under/over correction of the addition. Participants then used a smartphone-based app to subjectively determine binocularly their near point (NP) using a push-up method while looking at a blue stimulus that rescaled as a function of the face-device distance measured using the front camera of the device. For each induced level of under/over correction of the addition, participants completed three measurements of their near point.

Results

Linear regression analysis showed a strong correlation (R² = 0.82) between app-measured and clinical addition values. Bland-Altman analysis revealed a mean over estimation of -0.22± 0.38 D with a limit of agreement of ±0.74 D of the near correction. Cumulative error analysis indicated that 61.7 % of app measurements were within 0.25 D of clinical values, and 82.5 % within 0.50 D

Conclusions

A smartphone-based subjective measurement of presbyopic addition can potentially be used to assess the addition needed to detect the under or over corrected addition in full presbyopic subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Optometry
Journal of Optometry OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
66 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信