2004年印度安达曼群岛地震和海啸后的红树林治理、挑战和应对:利益相关者视角

IF 4.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 OCEANOGRAPHY
Meenakshi Poti , Anoop Raj Singh , Kartik Shanker , Nico Koedam , Nehru Prabakaran , Farid Dahdouh-Guebas , Jean Hugé
{"title":"2004年印度安达曼群岛地震和海啸后的红树林治理、挑战和应对:利益相关者视角","authors":"Meenakshi Poti ,&nbsp;Anoop Raj Singh ,&nbsp;Kartik Shanker ,&nbsp;Nico Koedam ,&nbsp;Nehru Prabakaran ,&nbsp;Farid Dahdouh-Guebas ,&nbsp;Jean Hugé","doi":"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Andaman Islands in India offer a unique case for studying mangrove social-ecological system (SES) governance due to their expansive mangrove cover of 600 km<sup>2</sup> (∼12 % of India's mangrove area), multicultural population, centralised governance from mainland India, and the 2004 earthquake and tsunami's transformative impacts on the islands. This study examines multiple stakeholder perceptions of mangrove SES governance, its challenges, and changes caused by the 2004 seismic event's subsidence and uplift. Further, we discuss strategies for addressing the governance challenges. We conducted and analysed 62 in-depth semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders in areas affected by subsidence and uplift, supplemented by a document analysis of scientific literature, regulations and policies. Findings show that while mangrove tree harvesting is prohibited, the mangrove fisheries sector remains under-regulated and poorly monitored. Mangrove planting by the Forest Department increased post-tsunami, driven by the recognition of coastal protection services, but often failed due to non-adaptation to elevation changes. Key governance challenges include top-down exclusionary management by the Forest Department, regulatory ambiguities over mangrove resources, lack of cross-sectoral collaboration, limited community participation due to complex settler histories, and stakeholder conflicts over resource use and ownership. These challenges are exacerbated by the 2004 seismic event. To overcome these barriers, clear resource management guidelines, scientific assessments and input, regular monitoring and improved stakeholder communication and participation are essential for fair decision-making and consistent implementation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54698,"journal":{"name":"Ocean & Coastal Management","volume":"269 ","pages":"Article 107786"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mangrove governance, its challenges, and responses to the 2004 earthquake and tsunami in the Andaman islands, India: A stakeholder perspective\",\"authors\":\"Meenakshi Poti ,&nbsp;Anoop Raj Singh ,&nbsp;Kartik Shanker ,&nbsp;Nico Koedam ,&nbsp;Nehru Prabakaran ,&nbsp;Farid Dahdouh-Guebas ,&nbsp;Jean Hugé\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2025.107786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Andaman Islands in India offer a unique case for studying mangrove social-ecological system (SES) governance due to their expansive mangrove cover of 600 km<sup>2</sup> (∼12 % of India's mangrove area), multicultural population, centralised governance from mainland India, and the 2004 earthquake and tsunami's transformative impacts on the islands. This study examines multiple stakeholder perceptions of mangrove SES governance, its challenges, and changes caused by the 2004 seismic event's subsidence and uplift. Further, we discuss strategies for addressing the governance challenges. We conducted and analysed 62 in-depth semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders in areas affected by subsidence and uplift, supplemented by a document analysis of scientific literature, regulations and policies. Findings show that while mangrove tree harvesting is prohibited, the mangrove fisheries sector remains under-regulated and poorly monitored. Mangrove planting by the Forest Department increased post-tsunami, driven by the recognition of coastal protection services, but often failed due to non-adaptation to elevation changes. Key governance challenges include top-down exclusionary management by the Forest Department, regulatory ambiguities over mangrove resources, lack of cross-sectoral collaboration, limited community participation due to complex settler histories, and stakeholder conflicts over resource use and ownership. These challenges are exacerbated by the 2004 seismic event. To overcome these barriers, clear resource management guidelines, scientific assessments and input, regular monitoring and improved stakeholder communication and participation are essential for fair decision-making and consistent implementation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"volume\":\"269 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107786\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ocean & Coastal Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125002480\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OCEANOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ocean & Coastal Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964569125002480","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OCEANOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印度安达曼群岛为研究红树林社会生态系统(SES)治理提供了一个独特的案例,因为其红树林覆盖面积达600平方公里(约占印度红树林面积的12%),人口多元文化,来自印度大陆的集中治理,以及2004年地震和海啸对岛屿的变革性影响。本研究考察了多个利益相关者对红树林SES治理的看法、面临的挑战以及2004年地震沉降和隆起造成的变化。此外,我们将讨论解决治理挑战的策略。我们对受沉降和隆起影响地区的不同利益相关者进行了62次深度半结构化访谈,并辅以对科学文献、法规和政策的文件分析。调查结果表明,虽然禁止砍伐红树林,但红树林渔业部门仍然缺乏监管和监测。海啸后,由于对海岸保护服务的认可,林业局增加了红树林种植,但由于不适应海拔变化,往往失败。主要的治理挑战包括林业部门自上而下的排他管理、对红树林资源的监管含糊不清、缺乏跨部门合作、由于复杂的定居者历史而导致的社区参与有限、以及利益相关者在资源使用和所有权方面的冲突。2004年的地震事件加剧了这些挑战。为了克服这些障碍,明确的资源管理准则、科学的评估和投入、定期监测以及改善利益攸关方的沟通和参与对于公平决策和一致实施至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mangrove governance, its challenges, and responses to the 2004 earthquake and tsunami in the Andaman islands, India: A stakeholder perspective
The Andaman Islands in India offer a unique case for studying mangrove social-ecological system (SES) governance due to their expansive mangrove cover of 600 km2 (∼12 % of India's mangrove area), multicultural population, centralised governance from mainland India, and the 2004 earthquake and tsunami's transformative impacts on the islands. This study examines multiple stakeholder perceptions of mangrove SES governance, its challenges, and changes caused by the 2004 seismic event's subsidence and uplift. Further, we discuss strategies for addressing the governance challenges. We conducted and analysed 62 in-depth semi-structured interviews with diverse stakeholders in areas affected by subsidence and uplift, supplemented by a document analysis of scientific literature, regulations and policies. Findings show that while mangrove tree harvesting is prohibited, the mangrove fisheries sector remains under-regulated and poorly monitored. Mangrove planting by the Forest Department increased post-tsunami, driven by the recognition of coastal protection services, but often failed due to non-adaptation to elevation changes. Key governance challenges include top-down exclusionary management by the Forest Department, regulatory ambiguities over mangrove resources, lack of cross-sectoral collaboration, limited community participation due to complex settler histories, and stakeholder conflicts over resource use and ownership. These challenges are exacerbated by the 2004 seismic event. To overcome these barriers, clear resource management guidelines, scientific assessments and input, regular monitoring and improved stakeholder communication and participation are essential for fair decision-making and consistent implementation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ocean & Coastal Management
Ocean & Coastal Management 环境科学-海洋学
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
15.20%
发文量
321
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Ocean & Coastal Management is the leading international journal dedicated to the study of all aspects of ocean and coastal management from the global to local levels. We publish rigorously peer-reviewed manuscripts from all disciplines, and inter-/trans-disciplinary and co-designed research, but all submissions must make clear the relevance to management and/or governance issues relevant to the sustainable development and conservation of oceans and coasts. Comparative studies (from sub-national to trans-national cases, and other management / policy arenas) are encouraged, as are studies that critically assess current management practices and governance approaches. Submissions involving robust analysis, development of theory, and improvement of management practice are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信