Danijel Jug , Dorijan Radočaj , Irena Jug , Mladen Jurišić , Bojana Brozović , Jorge Ivelic-Sáez , Edward Wilczewski , Jose Dörner , Boris Đurđević
{"title":"不同耕作、施肥和石灰处理下基于个体和集合机器学习比较评价的土壤穿透阻力预测","authors":"Danijel Jug , Dorijan Radočaj , Irena Jug , Mladen Jurišić , Bojana Brozović , Jorge Ivelic-Sáez , Edward Wilczewski , Jose Dörner , Boris Đurđević","doi":"10.1016/j.still.2025.106720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study evaluated ensemble machine learning for soil penetration resistance prediction under multiple tillage, fertilization and liming treatments, potentially reducing time-consuming field sampling. Fieldwork was conducted between 2020 and 2023 at two locations in continental Croatia, resulting in a total of 1458 samples per location during 2020 and 2021, and 972 samples in 2023. Four individual machine learning methods, including Random Forest (RF), Cubist (CUB), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks (BRNN), and their ensemble were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation in 10 repetitions for each combination of locations and years. The ensemble machine learning model achieved superior prediction accuracy in comparison to the four individual machine learning models evaluated in the study, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.681–0.896. Among covariates examined, soil measurement depth, day of year (DOY) of sampling and tillage were the most impactful for the optimal ensemble model, while liming had a limited effect on the soil penetration resistance prediction. These results suggest that ensemble machine learning provided a stable and accurate soil penetration resistance prediction approach, which could reduce labor requirements of future fieldwork campaigns.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49503,"journal":{"name":"Soil & Tillage Research","volume":"254 ","pages":"Article 106720"},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil penetration resistance prediction based on a comparative evaluation of individual and ensemble machine learning under varying tillage, fertilization and liming treatments\",\"authors\":\"Danijel Jug , Dorijan Radočaj , Irena Jug , Mladen Jurišić , Bojana Brozović , Jorge Ivelic-Sáez , Edward Wilczewski , Jose Dörner , Boris Đurđević\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.still.2025.106720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study evaluated ensemble machine learning for soil penetration resistance prediction under multiple tillage, fertilization and liming treatments, potentially reducing time-consuming field sampling. Fieldwork was conducted between 2020 and 2023 at two locations in continental Croatia, resulting in a total of 1458 samples per location during 2020 and 2021, and 972 samples in 2023. Four individual machine learning methods, including Random Forest (RF), Cubist (CUB), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks (BRNN), and their ensemble were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation in 10 repetitions for each combination of locations and years. The ensemble machine learning model achieved superior prediction accuracy in comparison to the four individual machine learning models evaluated in the study, with R<sup>2</sup> values of 0.681–0.896. Among covariates examined, soil measurement depth, day of year (DOY) of sampling and tillage were the most impactful for the optimal ensemble model, while liming had a limited effect on the soil penetration resistance prediction. These results suggest that ensemble machine learning provided a stable and accurate soil penetration resistance prediction approach, which could reduce labor requirements of future fieldwork campaigns.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"volume\":\"254 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Soil & Tillage Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002740\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOIL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil & Tillage Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167198725002740","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Soil penetration resistance prediction based on a comparative evaluation of individual and ensemble machine learning under varying tillage, fertilization and liming treatments
This study evaluated ensemble machine learning for soil penetration resistance prediction under multiple tillage, fertilization and liming treatments, potentially reducing time-consuming field sampling. Fieldwork was conducted between 2020 and 2023 at two locations in continental Croatia, resulting in a total of 1458 samples per location during 2020 and 2021, and 972 samples in 2023. Four individual machine learning methods, including Random Forest (RF), Cubist (CUB), Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks (BRNN), and their ensemble were evaluated using 10-fold cross-validation in 10 repetitions for each combination of locations and years. The ensemble machine learning model achieved superior prediction accuracy in comparison to the four individual machine learning models evaluated in the study, with R2 values of 0.681–0.896. Among covariates examined, soil measurement depth, day of year (DOY) of sampling and tillage were the most impactful for the optimal ensemble model, while liming had a limited effect on the soil penetration resistance prediction. These results suggest that ensemble machine learning provided a stable and accurate soil penetration resistance prediction approach, which could reduce labor requirements of future fieldwork campaigns.
期刊介绍:
Soil & Tillage Research examines the physical, chemical and biological changes in the soil caused by tillage and field traffic. Manuscripts will be considered on aspects of soil science, physics, technology, mechanization and applied engineering for a sustainable balance among productivity, environmental quality and profitability. The following are examples of suitable topics within the scope of the journal of Soil and Tillage Research:
The agricultural and biosystems engineering associated with tillage (including no-tillage, reduced-tillage and direct drilling), irrigation and drainage, crops and crop rotations, fertilization, rehabilitation of mine spoils and processes used to modify soils. Soil change effects on establishment and yield of crops, growth of plants and roots, structure and erosion of soil, cycling of carbon and nutrients, greenhouse gas emissions, leaching, runoff and other processes that affect environmental quality. Characterization or modeling of tillage and field traffic responses, soil, climate, or topographic effects, soil deformation processes, tillage tools, traction devices, energy requirements, economics, surface and subsurface water quality effects, tillage effects on weed, pest and disease control, and their interactions.