对监狱中老年人数字健康检查的批判性现实主义分析

IF 1.8 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rhys Mantell , Adrienne Withall , Amanuel Kidane Hagos , Kylie Radford , Natasha Ginnivan , Phillip Snoyman , Peter W Schofield , Tony Butler , Ye In Jane Hwang
{"title":"对监狱中老年人数字健康检查的批判性现实主义分析","authors":"Rhys Mantell ,&nbsp;Adrienne Withall ,&nbsp;Amanuel Kidane Hagos ,&nbsp;Kylie Radford ,&nbsp;Natasha Ginnivan ,&nbsp;Phillip Snoyman ,&nbsp;Peter W Schofield ,&nbsp;Tony Butler ,&nbsp;Ye In Jane Hwang","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The growing cohort of older people (50+) in Australian prisons have high rates of physical, psychosocial and cognitive conditions, with evidence that many of these remain underdiagnosed or undetected. It is necessary to better identify the priority health and social needs of older people in prison to ensure a safe, equitable and cost-effective prison health system. Increased digital health screening in prison is seen as one promising approach to achieve this end. This study aims to explore the factors that are likely to impact future adoption of digital health screening tools for older people in prison. This is a qualitative analysis underpinned by a critical realist philosophy and explanatory model of science. Primary data were collected through seven focus groups in prisons across New South Wales, Australia. Participants included a diverse sample of older people in prison (n = 20), as well as nurses and psychologists working in justice healthcare and the correctional system (n = 13). Two global themes were generated from our analysis - constraint and conflict. Constraint, focusing on structural factors, reveals that limited system capacity and competing service priorities create organisational barriers towards the implementation of additional digital health screening. The second theme, conflict, examines individual barriers to help-seeking for older people in prison. These are caused, in part, by past traumatic life experiences as well as current pressures to conform to prevailing social norms within the prison environment. These structural and individual factors, and their interplay, require further attention before widespread digital health screening can be successfully implemented in Australian prisons.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74862,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100581"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical realist analysis of digital health screening for older people in prison\",\"authors\":\"Rhys Mantell ,&nbsp;Adrienne Withall ,&nbsp;Amanuel Kidane Hagos ,&nbsp;Kylie Radford ,&nbsp;Natasha Ginnivan ,&nbsp;Phillip Snoyman ,&nbsp;Peter W Schofield ,&nbsp;Tony Butler ,&nbsp;Ye In Jane Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmqr.2025.100581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The growing cohort of older people (50+) in Australian prisons have high rates of physical, psychosocial and cognitive conditions, with evidence that many of these remain underdiagnosed or undetected. It is necessary to better identify the priority health and social needs of older people in prison to ensure a safe, equitable and cost-effective prison health system. Increased digital health screening in prison is seen as one promising approach to achieve this end. This study aims to explore the factors that are likely to impact future adoption of digital health screening tools for older people in prison. This is a qualitative analysis underpinned by a critical realist philosophy and explanatory model of science. Primary data were collected through seven focus groups in prisons across New South Wales, Australia. Participants included a diverse sample of older people in prison (n = 20), as well as nurses and psychologists working in justice healthcare and the correctional system (n = 13). Two global themes were generated from our analysis - constraint and conflict. Constraint, focusing on structural factors, reveals that limited system capacity and competing service priorities create organisational barriers towards the implementation of additional digital health screening. The second theme, conflict, examines individual barriers to help-seeking for older people in prison. These are caused, in part, by past traumatic life experiences as well as current pressures to conform to prevailing social norms within the prison environment. These structural and individual factors, and their interplay, require further attention before widespread digital health screening can be successfully implemented in Australian prisons.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100581\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Qualitative research in health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000599\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Qualitative research in health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667321525000599","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

澳大利亚监狱中越来越多的老年人(50岁以上)有很高的身体、社会心理和认知状况,有证据表明,其中许多人仍未得到诊断或未被发现。有必要更好地确定监狱中老年人的优先健康和社会需求,以确保建立一个安全、公平和具有成本效益的监狱卫生系统。在监狱中增加数字健康检查被视为实现这一目标的一个有希望的方法。本研究旨在探讨可能影响监狱中老年人未来采用数字健康筛查工具的因素。这是一种以批判现实主义哲学和科学解释模型为基础的定性分析。主要数据是通过澳大利亚新南威尔士州监狱的七个焦点小组收集的。参与者包括监狱中的老年人(n = 20),以及在司法保健和惩教系统工作的护士和心理学家(n = 13)。从我们的分析中产生了两个全球性的主题——约束和冲突。关注结构性因素的约束表明,有限的系统能力和相互竞争的服务优先级对实施额外的数字健康筛查造成了组织障碍。第二个主题是冲突,考察监狱中老年人寻求帮助的个人障碍。这部分是由于过去的痛苦生活经历以及目前在监狱环境中遵守现行社会规范的压力造成的。这些结构性和个人因素及其相互作用需要进一步关注,才能在澳大利亚监狱中成功实施广泛的数字健康检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A critical realist analysis of digital health screening for older people in prison
The growing cohort of older people (50+) in Australian prisons have high rates of physical, psychosocial and cognitive conditions, with evidence that many of these remain underdiagnosed or undetected. It is necessary to better identify the priority health and social needs of older people in prison to ensure a safe, equitable and cost-effective prison health system. Increased digital health screening in prison is seen as one promising approach to achieve this end. This study aims to explore the factors that are likely to impact future adoption of digital health screening tools for older people in prison. This is a qualitative analysis underpinned by a critical realist philosophy and explanatory model of science. Primary data were collected through seven focus groups in prisons across New South Wales, Australia. Participants included a diverse sample of older people in prison (n = 20), as well as nurses and psychologists working in justice healthcare and the correctional system (n = 13). Two global themes were generated from our analysis - constraint and conflict. Constraint, focusing on structural factors, reveals that limited system capacity and competing service priorities create organisational barriers towards the implementation of additional digital health screening. The second theme, conflict, examines individual barriers to help-seeking for older people in prison. These are caused, in part, by past traumatic life experiences as well as current pressures to conform to prevailing social norms within the prison environment. These structural and individual factors, and their interplay, require further attention before widespread digital health screening can be successfully implemented in Australian prisons.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
163 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信