Thiago H A Vendramini, Pedro H Marchi, Rodrigo F G Olivindo, Vivian Pedrinelli, Andressa R Amaral, Mariana S de Miranda, Leonardo A Príncipe, Cinthia G L Cesar, Rafael V A Zafalon, Mariana P Perini, Laís O C Lima, Júlio C C Balieiro, Marcio A Brunetto
{"title":"探索对伴侣动物补充omega-3的功效和最佳剂量。","authors":"Thiago H A Vendramini, Pedro H Marchi, Rodrigo F G Olivindo, Vivian Pedrinelli, Andressa R Amaral, Mariana S de Miranda, Leonardo A Príncipe, Cinthia G L Cesar, Rafael V A Zafalon, Mariana P Perini, Laís O C Lima, Júlio C C Balieiro, Marcio A Brunetto","doi":"10.1017/S0954422425100115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review summarizes findings from studies in companion animals with chronic diseases receiving omega-3 supplementation. Investigated conditions included dermatopathies (dogs n=7), osteoarthritis (dogs n=7, cats n=2), cardiovascular diseases (dogs n=7), dyslipidaemias (dogs n=1), gastroenteropathies (dogs n=2), chronic kidney disease (dogs n=2, cats n=3), cognitive impairment (dogs n=4, cats n=1), and behavioural disorders (dogs n=3). When possible, dosages were standardized to mg/kg using available data on food intake and EPA/DHA concentrations. The minimum and maximum ranges of EPA and DHA, along with their ratios, were as follows: for dermatology 0.99-43 mg/kg EPA and 0.66-30 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.4-3.4); for osteoarthritis 48-100 mg/kg EPA and 20-32 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.5-3.4); cardiology 27-54.2 mg/kg EPA and 18-40.6 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.3-1.5); dyslipidaemia 58.8 mg/kg EPA and 45.4 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.3); cognition (1/5 studies) 225 mg/kg EPA and 90 mg/kg DHA (ratio 2.5); behaviour (1/3) 31 mg/kg EPA and 45 mg/kg DHA (ratio 0.7). Nephrology and oncology studies lacked sufficient data for calculation. Gastrointestinal diseases do not appear to benefit from omega-3 supplementation, likely due to inflammation-related malabsorption, although few adverse effects were reported in dogs. Other enteropathy studies were low-quality (case reports/series). The lowest omega-6/omega-3 ratio with anti-inflammatory effect was 1:3.75; the highest was 5.5:1. In conclusion, the reviewed EPA and DHA doses appear effective for atopic dermatitis, osteoarthritis, cardiac disease, hyperlipidaemia, and cognitive and behavioural disorders. Further research is needed to clarify efficacy in gastrointestinal and oncological conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":54703,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-47"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the efficacy and optimal dosages of omega-3 supplementation for companion animals.\",\"authors\":\"Thiago H A Vendramini, Pedro H Marchi, Rodrigo F G Olivindo, Vivian Pedrinelli, Andressa R Amaral, Mariana S de Miranda, Leonardo A Príncipe, Cinthia G L Cesar, Rafael V A Zafalon, Mariana P Perini, Laís O C Lima, Júlio C C Balieiro, Marcio A Brunetto\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0954422425100115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This review summarizes findings from studies in companion animals with chronic diseases receiving omega-3 supplementation. Investigated conditions included dermatopathies (dogs n=7), osteoarthritis (dogs n=7, cats n=2), cardiovascular diseases (dogs n=7), dyslipidaemias (dogs n=1), gastroenteropathies (dogs n=2), chronic kidney disease (dogs n=2, cats n=3), cognitive impairment (dogs n=4, cats n=1), and behavioural disorders (dogs n=3). When possible, dosages were standardized to mg/kg using available data on food intake and EPA/DHA concentrations. The minimum and maximum ranges of EPA and DHA, along with their ratios, were as follows: for dermatology 0.99-43 mg/kg EPA and 0.66-30 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.4-3.4); for osteoarthritis 48-100 mg/kg EPA and 20-32 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.5-3.4); cardiology 27-54.2 mg/kg EPA and 18-40.6 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.3-1.5); dyslipidaemia 58.8 mg/kg EPA and 45.4 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.3); cognition (1/5 studies) 225 mg/kg EPA and 90 mg/kg DHA (ratio 2.5); behaviour (1/3) 31 mg/kg EPA and 45 mg/kg DHA (ratio 0.7). Nephrology and oncology studies lacked sufficient data for calculation. Gastrointestinal diseases do not appear to benefit from omega-3 supplementation, likely due to inflammation-related malabsorption, although few adverse effects were reported in dogs. Other enteropathy studies were low-quality (case reports/series). The lowest omega-6/omega-3 ratio with anti-inflammatory effect was 1:3.75; the highest was 5.5:1. In conclusion, the reviewed EPA and DHA doses appear effective for atopic dermatitis, osteoarthritis, cardiac disease, hyperlipidaemia, and cognitive and behavioural disorders. Further research is needed to clarify efficacy in gastrointestinal and oncological conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54703,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Research Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-47\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Research Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422425100115\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0954422425100115","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Exploring the efficacy and optimal dosages of omega-3 supplementation for companion animals.
This review summarizes findings from studies in companion animals with chronic diseases receiving omega-3 supplementation. Investigated conditions included dermatopathies (dogs n=7), osteoarthritis (dogs n=7, cats n=2), cardiovascular diseases (dogs n=7), dyslipidaemias (dogs n=1), gastroenteropathies (dogs n=2), chronic kidney disease (dogs n=2, cats n=3), cognitive impairment (dogs n=4, cats n=1), and behavioural disorders (dogs n=3). When possible, dosages were standardized to mg/kg using available data on food intake and EPA/DHA concentrations. The minimum and maximum ranges of EPA and DHA, along with their ratios, were as follows: for dermatology 0.99-43 mg/kg EPA and 0.66-30 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.4-3.4); for osteoarthritis 48-100 mg/kg EPA and 20-32 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.5-3.4); cardiology 27-54.2 mg/kg EPA and 18-40.6 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.3-1.5); dyslipidaemia 58.8 mg/kg EPA and 45.4 mg/kg DHA (ratio 1.3); cognition (1/5 studies) 225 mg/kg EPA and 90 mg/kg DHA (ratio 2.5); behaviour (1/3) 31 mg/kg EPA and 45 mg/kg DHA (ratio 0.7). Nephrology and oncology studies lacked sufficient data for calculation. Gastrointestinal diseases do not appear to benefit from omega-3 supplementation, likely due to inflammation-related malabsorption, although few adverse effects were reported in dogs. Other enteropathy studies were low-quality (case reports/series). The lowest omega-6/omega-3 ratio with anti-inflammatory effect was 1:3.75; the highest was 5.5:1. In conclusion, the reviewed EPA and DHA doses appear effective for atopic dermatitis, osteoarthritis, cardiac disease, hyperlipidaemia, and cognitive and behavioural disorders. Further research is needed to clarify efficacy in gastrointestinal and oncological conditions.
期刊介绍:
Nutrition Research Reviews offers a comprehensive overview of nutritional science today. By distilling the latest research and linking it to established practice, the journal consistently delivers the widest range of in-depth articles in the field of nutritional science. It presents up-to-date, critical reviews of key topics in nutrition science advancing new concepts and hypotheses that encourage the exchange of fundamental ideas on nutritional well-being in both humans and animals.