基于机器学习的老年缺血性脑卒中介入手术后颈动脉再狭窄预测模型的建立与应用

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Xianmei Wu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongmei Lin, Yanbo Zhang, Yanchun Jiang, Bangzhi Jiang
{"title":"基于机器学习的老年缺血性脑卒中介入手术后颈动脉再狭窄预测模型的建立与应用","authors":"Xianmei Wu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongmei Lin, Yanbo Zhang, Yanchun Jiang, Bangzhi Jiang","doi":"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop a machine learning-based risk prediction model for carotid restenosis in elderly ischemic stroke patients after interventional surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected clinical data from 371 elderly ischemic stroke patients who underwent carotid interventional surgery between January 2020 and December 2023, as training dataset. Various machine learning methods were applied to analyze and compare the predictive performance of different models. In addition, data from 75 cases collected between January and June 2024 was as a validation set to assess model applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six factors influencing carotid restenosis were identified: homocysteine (Hcy), platelet count (PLT), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Machine learning models were developed, with the Gradient Boosting Machine showing the best performance (AUROC=0.969). Other models included support vector machine (AUROC=0.962), logistic regression (AUROC=0.945), decision tree (AUROC=0.885), and extreme gradient boosting (AUROC=0.753). The GBM model's predictive variable ranking was Hcy, IL-6, CRP, PDW, PLT, and MPV. In the validation set, the GBM model demonstrated excellent performance, with an AUC 0.939, sensitivity 0.909, specificity 0.969, accuracy 0.960, negative predictive value 0.984, and positive predictive value 0.833.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research showed that compared with other machine learning algorithms, the GBM model demonstrates the best accuracy and stability in predicting the risk of carotid restenosis after interventional surgery in elderly ischemic stroke patients, and it has high clinical application value.</p>","PeriodicalId":49758,"journal":{"name":"Neurologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development and Application of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Carotid Restenosis After Interventional Surgery in Elderly Ischemic Stroke Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Xianmei Wu, Xiaoyang Wang, Hongmei Lin, Yanbo Zhang, Yanchun Jiang, Bangzhi Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/NRL.0000000000000627\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to develop a machine learning-based risk prediction model for carotid restenosis in elderly ischemic stroke patients after interventional surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We collected clinical data from 371 elderly ischemic stroke patients who underwent carotid interventional surgery between January 2020 and December 2023, as training dataset. Various machine learning methods were applied to analyze and compare the predictive performance of different models. In addition, data from 75 cases collected between January and June 2024 was as a validation set to assess model applicability.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six factors influencing carotid restenosis were identified: homocysteine (Hcy), platelet count (PLT), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Machine learning models were developed, with the Gradient Boosting Machine showing the best performance (AUROC=0.969). Other models included support vector machine (AUROC=0.962), logistic regression (AUROC=0.945), decision tree (AUROC=0.885), and extreme gradient boosting (AUROC=0.753). The GBM model's predictive variable ranking was Hcy, IL-6, CRP, PDW, PLT, and MPV. In the validation set, the GBM model demonstrated excellent performance, with an AUC 0.939, sensitivity 0.909, specificity 0.969, accuracy 0.960, negative predictive value 0.984, and positive predictive value 0.833.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our research showed that compared with other machine learning algorithms, the GBM model demonstrates the best accuracy and stability in predicting the risk of carotid restenosis after interventional surgery in elderly ischemic stroke patients, and it has high clinical application value.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000627\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurologist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NRL.0000000000000627","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:建立基于机器学习的老年缺血性脑卒中患者介入手术后颈动脉再狭窄风险预测模型。方法:收集2020年1月至2023年12月期间接受颈动脉介入手术的371例老年缺血性脑卒中患者的临床数据作为训练数据集。应用各种机器学习方法分析和比较不同模型的预测性能。此外,从2024年1月至6月收集的75个案例的数据作为验证集来评估模型的适用性。结果:确定了影响颈动脉再狭窄的6个因素:同型半胱氨酸(Hcy)、血小板计数(PLT)、血小板分布宽度(PDW)、平均血小板体积(MPV)、白细胞介素-6 (IL-6)、c反应蛋白(CRP)。建立了机器学习模型,其中Gradient Boosting Machine表现最好(AUROC=0.969)。其他模型包括支持向量机(AUROC=0.962)、逻辑回归(AUROC=0.945)、决策树(AUROC=0.885)和极端梯度增强(AUROC=0.753)。GBM模型的预测变量依次为Hcy、IL-6、CRP、PDW、PLT和MPV。在验证集中,GBM模型的AUC为0.939,灵敏度为0.909,特异性为0.969,准确率为0.960,阴性预测值为0.984,阳性预测值为0.833。结论:我们的研究表明,与其他机器学习算法相比,GBM模型预测老年缺血性脑卒中患者介入手术后颈动脉再狭窄风险的准确性和稳定性最好,具有较高的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development and Application of a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model for Carotid Restenosis After Interventional Surgery in Elderly Ischemic Stroke Patients.

Objective: This study aims to develop a machine learning-based risk prediction model for carotid restenosis in elderly ischemic stroke patients after interventional surgery.

Methods: We collected clinical data from 371 elderly ischemic stroke patients who underwent carotid interventional surgery between January 2020 and December 2023, as training dataset. Various machine learning methods were applied to analyze and compare the predictive performance of different models. In addition, data from 75 cases collected between January and June 2024 was as a validation set to assess model applicability.

Results: Six factors influencing carotid restenosis were identified: homocysteine (Hcy), platelet count (PLT), platelet distribution width (PDW), mean platelet volume (MPV), Interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP). Machine learning models were developed, with the Gradient Boosting Machine showing the best performance (AUROC=0.969). Other models included support vector machine (AUROC=0.962), logistic regression (AUROC=0.945), decision tree (AUROC=0.885), and extreme gradient boosting (AUROC=0.753). The GBM model's predictive variable ranking was Hcy, IL-6, CRP, PDW, PLT, and MPV. In the validation set, the GBM model demonstrated excellent performance, with an AUC 0.939, sensitivity 0.909, specificity 0.969, accuracy 0.960, negative predictive value 0.984, and positive predictive value 0.833.

Conclusion: Our research showed that compared with other machine learning algorithms, the GBM model demonstrates the best accuracy and stability in predicting the risk of carotid restenosis after interventional surgery in elderly ischemic stroke patients, and it has high clinical application value.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurologist
Neurologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
151
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Neurologist publishes articles on topics of current interest to physicians treating patients with neurological diseases. The core of the journal is review articles focusing on clinically relevant issues. The journal also publishes case reports or case series which review the literature and put observations in perspective, as well as letters to the editor. Special features include the popular "10 Most Commonly Asked Questions" and the "Patient and Family Fact Sheet," a handy tear-out page that can be copied to hand out to patients and their caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信