单独低强度光治疗与强脉冲光联合治疗伴有睑板腺功能障碍的干眼病:一项随机配对眼和作用机制试验

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Jeremy Chung Bo Chiang, Viktor Dremin, David A Semp, Hiu Yan Lam, Patrick Wk Ting, Moonisah Ayaz, James S Wolffsohn
{"title":"单独低强度光治疗与强脉冲光联合治疗伴有睑板腺功能障碍的干眼病:一项随机配对眼和作用机制试验","authors":"Jeremy Chung Bo Chiang, Viktor Dremin, David A Semp, Hiu Yan Lam, Patrick Wk Ting, Moonisah Ayaz, James S Wolffsohn","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate ocular surface changes following intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) combined with low level light therapy (LLLT) versus LLLT alone for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients with dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants with MGD and DED were recruited into a double-masked, paired-eye clinical trial, with one eye randomised to being treated with combined therapy and the other eye with LLLT alone across 4 treatment sessions, each 2 to 3 weeks apart. Follow-up assessments were also conducted at 2 weeks and then 3 months after the final treatment. Outcome measures included change in DED signs, symptomatology and in-vivo confocal microscopy parameters at final follow-up from baseline. Mechanism of action was explored with laser doppler flowmetry and fluorescence measures of the central lower eyelid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptom frequency rated with the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire in Dry Eye improved from baseline to final follow-up with combined therapy (mean difference - 21.6; 95 % CI - 38.5, -4.8; p = 0.005) and LLLT alone (-20.5; 95 % CI - 37.9, -3.1; p = 0.01), while symptom severity improved only with combined therapy (-18.5; 95 % CI - 34.5, -2.6; p = 0.01). Both modalities improved meibum expressibility following 3 treatment sessions, although improvement remained at final follow-up only with LLLT alone (-0.5, 95 % CI - 0.8, -0.2; p < 0.001). Tissue flavin fluorescence decreased after the fifth visit only with combined therapy (-12.7; 95 % CI - 4.9, 20.6; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined therapy may have further mechanistic changes in increasing cellular metabolism, in addition to improvements in symptoms and meibum expressibility compared to LLLT alone. LLLT alone could be considered an adjunctive therapy for MGD if IPL is contraindicated.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":" ","pages":"102456"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low-level light therapy alone versus combination therapy with intense pulsed light in the treatment of dry eye disease with meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomised paired-eye and mechanism of action trial.\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy Chung Bo Chiang, Viktor Dremin, David A Semp, Hiu Yan Lam, Patrick Wk Ting, Moonisah Ayaz, James S Wolffsohn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clae.2025.102456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate ocular surface changes following intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) combined with low level light therapy (LLLT) versus LLLT alone for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients with dry eye disease (DED).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-four participants with MGD and DED were recruited into a double-masked, paired-eye clinical trial, with one eye randomised to being treated with combined therapy and the other eye with LLLT alone across 4 treatment sessions, each 2 to 3 weeks apart. Follow-up assessments were also conducted at 2 weeks and then 3 months after the final treatment. Outcome measures included change in DED signs, symptomatology and in-vivo confocal microscopy parameters at final follow-up from baseline. Mechanism of action was explored with laser doppler flowmetry and fluorescence measures of the central lower eyelid.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Symptom frequency rated with the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire in Dry Eye improved from baseline to final follow-up with combined therapy (mean difference - 21.6; 95 % CI - 38.5, -4.8; p = 0.005) and LLLT alone (-20.5; 95 % CI - 37.9, -3.1; p = 0.01), while symptom severity improved only with combined therapy (-18.5; 95 % CI - 34.5, -2.6; p = 0.01). Both modalities improved meibum expressibility following 3 treatment sessions, although improvement remained at final follow-up only with LLLT alone (-0.5, 95 % CI - 0.8, -0.2; p < 0.001). Tissue flavin fluorescence decreased after the fifth visit only with combined therapy (-12.7; 95 % CI - 4.9, 20.6; p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Combined therapy may have further mechanistic changes in increasing cellular metabolism, in addition to improvements in symptoms and meibum expressibility compared to LLLT alone. LLLT alone could be considered an adjunctive therapy for MGD if IPL is contraindicated.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"102456\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102456\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2025.102456","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨强脉冲光治疗(IPL)联合弱光治疗(LLLT)与单用弱光治疗(LLLT)治疗干眼病(DED)患者睑板腺功能障碍(MGD)后眼表的变化。方法:24名患有MGD和DED的参与者被招募到一项双盲、配对眼的临床试验中,其中一只眼睛随机分配接受联合治疗,另一只眼睛单独接受LLLT治疗,共4次治疗,每次治疗间隔2至3周。在最终治疗后2周和3个月分别进行随访评估。结果测量包括从基线到最终随访时DED体征、症状学和体内共聚焦显微镜参数的变化。采用激光多普勒血流法和荧光法对下眼睑中心部位的作用机制进行了探讨。结果:干眼症症状评估问卷评分的症状频次从基线到联合治疗的最终随访有所改善(平均差值- 21.6;95% ci - 38.5, -4.8;p = 0.005)和LLLT单独(-20.5;95% ci - 37.9, -3.1;P = 0.01),而症状严重程度仅在联合治疗时改善(-18.5;95% ci - 34.5, -2.6;p = 0.01)。两种治疗方式在3次治疗后都改善了代谢因子的表达,尽管仅LLLT治疗在最后随访时仍有改善(-0.5,95% CI - 0.8, -0.2;结论:与单用LLLT相比,联合治疗除了改善症状和代谢表达外,还可能在增加细胞代谢方面有进一步的机制改变。如果IPL是禁忌症,单独的LLLT可以被认为是MGD的辅助治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low-level light therapy alone versus combination therapy with intense pulsed light in the treatment of dry eye disease with meibomian gland dysfunction: A randomised paired-eye and mechanism of action trial.

Purpose: To investigate ocular surface changes following intense pulsed light therapy (IPL) combined with low level light therapy (LLLT) versus LLLT alone for the treatment of meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) in patients with dry eye disease (DED).

Methods: Twenty-four participants with MGD and DED were recruited into a double-masked, paired-eye clinical trial, with one eye randomised to being treated with combined therapy and the other eye with LLLT alone across 4 treatment sessions, each 2 to 3 weeks apart. Follow-up assessments were also conducted at 2 weeks and then 3 months after the final treatment. Outcome measures included change in DED signs, symptomatology and in-vivo confocal microscopy parameters at final follow-up from baseline. Mechanism of action was explored with laser doppler flowmetry and fluorescence measures of the central lower eyelid.

Results: Symptom frequency rated with the Symptom Assessment Questionnaire in Dry Eye improved from baseline to final follow-up with combined therapy (mean difference - 21.6; 95 % CI - 38.5, -4.8; p = 0.005) and LLLT alone (-20.5; 95 % CI - 37.9, -3.1; p = 0.01), while symptom severity improved only with combined therapy (-18.5; 95 % CI - 34.5, -2.6; p = 0.01). Both modalities improved meibum expressibility following 3 treatment sessions, although improvement remained at final follow-up only with LLLT alone (-0.5, 95 % CI - 0.8, -0.2; p < 0.001). Tissue flavin fluorescence decreased after the fifth visit only with combined therapy (-12.7; 95 % CI - 4.9, 20.6; p = 0.001).

Conclusions: Combined therapy may have further mechanistic changes in increasing cellular metabolism, in addition to improvements in symptoms and meibum expressibility compared to LLLT alone. LLLT alone could be considered an adjunctive therapy for MGD if IPL is contraindicated.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信