外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)/吸入氧分数(FiO2)比值与动脉血氧分压(PaO2)/FiO2比值诊断急性呼吸窘迫综合征的比较研究

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Srishti Rathi, Rajesh Kakkar, Shubhanshu Chawla, Sushant Khanduri, Rajeev Mohan Kaushik, Reshma Kaushik
{"title":"外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)/吸入氧分数(FiO2)比值与动脉血氧分压(PaO2)/FiO2比值诊断急性呼吸窘迫综合征的比较研究","authors":"Srishti Rathi, Rajesh Kakkar, Shubhanshu Chawla, Sushant Khanduri, Rajeev Mohan Kaushik, Reshma Kaushik","doi":"10.1177/00494755251349071","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Our study determined the reliability of using the ratio of peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) rather than the ratio of arterial partial oxygen pressure (PaO<sub>2</sub>) and FiO<sub>2</sub> for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas analysis were performed to obtain both ratios, respectively, in 70 patients who fulfilled the Berlin definition criteria of ARDS. A detailed history, clinical examination, and relevant evaluation were done. There was a significant correlation between the two ratios. The former had a lower sensitivity and specificity than the latter. Thus, the SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio is a reliable, straightforward, non-invasive, and readily available marker for diagnosing the presence and severity of ARDS, and may be used as an alternative to the PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio in resource-limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":49415,"journal":{"name":"Tropical Doctor","volume":" ","pages":"494755251349071"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utility of peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) ratio and arterial partial oxygen pressure (PaO<sub>2</sub>)/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio in the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: A comparative study.\",\"authors\":\"Srishti Rathi, Rajesh Kakkar, Shubhanshu Chawla, Sushant Khanduri, Rajeev Mohan Kaushik, Reshma Kaushik\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00494755251349071\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Our study determined the reliability of using the ratio of peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>) rather than the ratio of arterial partial oxygen pressure (PaO<sub>2</sub>) and FiO<sub>2</sub> for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas analysis were performed to obtain both ratios, respectively, in 70 patients who fulfilled the Berlin definition criteria of ARDS. A detailed history, clinical examination, and relevant evaluation were done. There was a significant correlation between the two ratios. The former had a lower sensitivity and specificity than the latter. Thus, the SpO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio is a reliable, straightforward, non-invasive, and readily available marker for diagnosing the presence and severity of ARDS, and may be used as an alternative to the PaO<sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio in resource-limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical Doctor\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"494755251349071\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical Doctor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755251349071\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical Doctor","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00494755251349071","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究确定用外周血氧饱和度(SpO2)与吸入氧分数(FiO2)之比而非动脉血分氧压(PaO2)与FiO2之比诊断急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的可靠性。对70例符合ARDS柏林定义标准的患者进行脉搏血氧测定和动脉血气分析,分别获得两种比值。详细病史、临床检查及相关评价。这两个比率之间存在显著的相关性。前者的敏感性和特异性均低于后者。因此,SpO2/FiO2比值是一种可靠、直接、无创且易于获得的诊断ARDS存在和严重程度的标志物,在资源有限的情况下可作为PaO2/FiO2比值的替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utility of peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio and arterial partial oxygen pressure (PaO2)/FiO2 ratio in the diagnosis of acute respiratory distress syndrome: A comparative study.

Our study determined the reliability of using the ratio of peripheral blood oxygen saturation (SpO2) and the fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) rather than the ratio of arterial partial oxygen pressure (PaO2) and FiO2 for diagnosing acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Pulse oximetry and arterial blood gas analysis were performed to obtain both ratios, respectively, in 70 patients who fulfilled the Berlin definition criteria of ARDS. A detailed history, clinical examination, and relevant evaluation were done. There was a significant correlation between the two ratios. The former had a lower sensitivity and specificity than the latter. Thus, the SpO2/FiO2 ratio is a reliable, straightforward, non-invasive, and readily available marker for diagnosing the presence and severity of ARDS, and may be used as an alternative to the PaO2/FiO2 ratio in resource-limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tropical Doctor
Tropical Doctor 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
144
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The only journal written by and for health workers in low and middle-income countries, Tropical Doctor provides medical expertise and practical advice on how to apply current medical knowledge to the special circumstances of LMIC countries. This journal provides an ideal forum for sharing experiences and establishing best practice, aiding communication between medical professionals in different environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信