{"title":"使用可解释的机器学习模型预测危重感染性心力衰竭患者的生存率。","authors":"Hai-Ying Yang, Meng-Han Jiang, Fang Yu, Li-Juan Yang, Xin Zhang, De-Min Li, Yu Guo, Jia-De Zhu, Sun-Jun Yin, Gong-Hao He","doi":"10.1177/09287329251346284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic patients with heart failure (HF) have higher mortality and poorer prognosis than patients with either disease alone. Currently, no tool exists for predicting survival rate in such patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop an interpretable prediction model to predict survival rate for septic patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Severe septic patients with HF were recruited from the MIMIC-IV database (as training and internal validation cohorts) as well as from the MIMIC-III database (as external validation cohorts). Four models including Deep Learning Survival (DeepSurv) were constructed and evaluated. Furthermore, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was employed to explain the DeepSurv model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,778 patients were included and 22 features were identified to construct the models. Among the 4 models, the DeepSurv model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) values with an AUC of 0.851 (internal) and 0.801 (external) and C-index of 0.8329 (internal) and 0.7816 (external). The mean cumulative/dynamic AUC values exceeded 0.85 in both internal and external validations. The Integrated Brier Score values were well below 0.25, at 0.068 and 0.093, respectively. Furthermore, the Decision Curve Analysis showed that the DeepSurv model achieved favorable net benefit. The SHAP method further confirmed the reliability of the DeepSurv model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our DeepSurv model was the most comprehensive interpretable prediction model specifically developed and validated for septic critically ill patients with HF. It demonstrated good model performance in predicting the 28-day survival rate of such patients and will provide valuable decision support for clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":48978,"journal":{"name":"Technology and Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"9287329251346284"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting survival rates of critically ill septic patients with heart failure using interpretable machine learning models.\",\"authors\":\"Hai-Ying Yang, Meng-Han Jiang, Fang Yu, Li-Juan Yang, Xin Zhang, De-Min Li, Yu Guo, Jia-De Zhu, Sun-Jun Yin, Gong-Hao He\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09287329251346284\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Septic patients with heart failure (HF) have higher mortality and poorer prognosis than patients with either disease alone. Currently, no tool exists for predicting survival rate in such patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop an interpretable prediction model to predict survival rate for septic patients with HF.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Severe septic patients with HF were recruited from the MIMIC-IV database (as training and internal validation cohorts) as well as from the MIMIC-III database (as external validation cohorts). Four models including Deep Learning Survival (DeepSurv) were constructed and evaluated. Furthermore, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was employed to explain the DeepSurv model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 11,778 patients were included and 22 features were identified to construct the models. Among the 4 models, the DeepSurv model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) values with an AUC of 0.851 (internal) and 0.801 (external) and C-index of 0.8329 (internal) and 0.7816 (external). The mean cumulative/dynamic AUC values exceeded 0.85 in both internal and external validations. The Integrated Brier Score values were well below 0.25, at 0.068 and 0.093, respectively. Furthermore, the Decision Curve Analysis showed that the DeepSurv model achieved favorable net benefit. The SHAP method further confirmed the reliability of the DeepSurv model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our DeepSurv model was the most comprehensive interpretable prediction model specifically developed and validated for septic critically ill patients with HF. It demonstrated good model performance in predicting the 28-day survival rate of such patients and will provide valuable decision support for clinicians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"9287329251346284\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology and Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251346284\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology and Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09287329251346284","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Predicting survival rates of critically ill septic patients with heart failure using interpretable machine learning models.
Background: Septic patients with heart failure (HF) have higher mortality and poorer prognosis than patients with either disease alone. Currently, no tool exists for predicting survival rate in such patients.
Objective: This study aimed to develop an interpretable prediction model to predict survival rate for septic patients with HF.
Methods: Severe septic patients with HF were recruited from the MIMIC-IV database (as training and internal validation cohorts) as well as from the MIMIC-III database (as external validation cohorts). Four models including Deep Learning Survival (DeepSurv) were constructed and evaluated. Furthermore, Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method was employed to explain the DeepSurv model.
Results: A total of 11,778 patients were included and 22 features were identified to construct the models. Among the 4 models, the DeepSurv model had the highest area under the curve (AUC) values with an AUC of 0.851 (internal) and 0.801 (external) and C-index of 0.8329 (internal) and 0.7816 (external). The mean cumulative/dynamic AUC values exceeded 0.85 in both internal and external validations. The Integrated Brier Score values were well below 0.25, at 0.068 and 0.093, respectively. Furthermore, the Decision Curve Analysis showed that the DeepSurv model achieved favorable net benefit. The SHAP method further confirmed the reliability of the DeepSurv model.
Conclusion: Our DeepSurv model was the most comprehensive interpretable prediction model specifically developed and validated for septic critically ill patients with HF. It demonstrated good model performance in predicting the 28-day survival rate of such patients and will provide valuable decision support for clinicians.
期刊介绍:
Technology and Health Care is intended to serve as a forum for the presentation of original articles and technical notes, observing rigorous scientific standards. Furthermore, upon invitation, reviews, tutorials, discussion papers and minisymposia are featured. The main focus of THC is related to the overlapping areas of engineering and medicine. The following types of contributions are considered:
1.Original articles: New concepts, procedures and devices associated with the use of technology in medical research and clinical practice are presented to a readership with a widespread background in engineering and/or medicine. In particular, the clinical benefit deriving from the application of engineering methods and devices in clinical medicine should be demonstrated. Typically, full length original contributions have a length of 4000 words, thereby taking duly into account figures and tables.
2.Technical Notes and Short Communications: Technical Notes relate to novel technical developments with relevance for clinical medicine. In Short Communications, clinical applications are shortly described. 3.Both Technical Notes and Short Communications typically have a length of 1500 words.
Reviews and Tutorials (upon invitation only): Tutorial and educational articles for persons with a primarily medical background on principles of engineering with particular significance for biomedical applications and vice versa are presented. The Editorial Board is responsible for the selection of topics.
4.Minisymposia (upon invitation only): Under the leadership of a Special Editor, controversial or important issues relating to health care are highlighted and discussed by various authors.
5.Letters to the Editors: Discussions or short statements (not indexed).