{"title":"教育结果中的隔离、选择和不平等:来自公开选择数据的证据。","authors":"Dafna Gelbgiser, Sigal Alon","doi":"10.1215/00703370-11994413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Disparities in educational trajectories and outcomes of segregated social groups concern population scientists and policymakers worldwide. This study examines the role of decision-making processes in generating educational disparities across groups in a segregated society. We argue that the unequal opportunity structure associated with segregation yields systematic disparities in decision-making that underlie choices, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for disadvantaged social groups. We test this argument using unique administrative records on the college application choices of Jewish and Arab applicants to universities in Israel, a country characterized by pronounced segregation, educational disparities, and labor market stratification. The data and settings allow us to isolate factors frequently used to explain disparities in university application choices by discounting costs, geographic proximity, and information constraints. Results from conditional logit (choice) models reveal group variations in how academically equivalent applicants weigh program characteristics, leading to significant disparities in the incidence of academic mismatch. These variations explain a substantial portion of the gap in university admissions between Jewish and Arab applicants. These findings demonstrate that stratified decision-making processes are an important link between segregation and inequality in life chances.</p>","PeriodicalId":48394,"journal":{"name":"Demography","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Segregation, Choices, and Inequality in Educational Outcomes: Evidence From Revealed Choice Data.\",\"authors\":\"Dafna Gelbgiser, Sigal Alon\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/00703370-11994413\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Disparities in educational trajectories and outcomes of segregated social groups concern population scientists and policymakers worldwide. This study examines the role of decision-making processes in generating educational disparities across groups in a segregated society. We argue that the unequal opportunity structure associated with segregation yields systematic disparities in decision-making that underlie choices, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for disadvantaged social groups. We test this argument using unique administrative records on the college application choices of Jewish and Arab applicants to universities in Israel, a country characterized by pronounced segregation, educational disparities, and labor market stratification. The data and settings allow us to isolate factors frequently used to explain disparities in university application choices by discounting costs, geographic proximity, and information constraints. Results from conditional logit (choice) models reveal group variations in how academically equivalent applicants weigh program characteristics, leading to significant disparities in the incidence of academic mismatch. These variations explain a substantial portion of the gap in university admissions between Jewish and Arab applicants. These findings demonstrate that stratified decision-making processes are an important link between segregation and inequality in life chances.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48394,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Demography\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Demography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11994413\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEMOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Demography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/00703370-11994413","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Segregation, Choices, and Inequality in Educational Outcomes: Evidence From Revealed Choice Data.
Disparities in educational trajectories and outcomes of segregated social groups concern population scientists and policymakers worldwide. This study examines the role of decision-making processes in generating educational disparities across groups in a segregated society. We argue that the unequal opportunity structure associated with segregation yields systematic disparities in decision-making that underlie choices, resulting in suboptimal outcomes for disadvantaged social groups. We test this argument using unique administrative records on the college application choices of Jewish and Arab applicants to universities in Israel, a country characterized by pronounced segregation, educational disparities, and labor market stratification. The data and settings allow us to isolate factors frequently used to explain disparities in university application choices by discounting costs, geographic proximity, and information constraints. Results from conditional logit (choice) models reveal group variations in how academically equivalent applicants weigh program characteristics, leading to significant disparities in the incidence of academic mismatch. These variations explain a substantial portion of the gap in university admissions between Jewish and Arab applicants. These findings demonstrate that stratified decision-making processes are an important link between segregation and inequality in life chances.
期刊介绍:
Since its founding in 1964, the journal Demography has mirrored the vitality, diversity, high intellectual standard and wide impact of the field on which it reports. Demography presents the highest quality original research of scholars in a broad range of disciplines, including anthropology, biology, economics, geography, history, psychology, public health, sociology, and statistics. The journal encompasses a wide variety of methodological approaches to population research. Its geographic focus is global, with articles addressing demographic matters from around the planet. Its temporal scope is broad, as represented by research that explores demographic phenomena spanning the ages from the past to the present, and reaching toward the future. Authors whose work is published in Demography benefit from the wide audience of population scientists their research will reach. Also in 2011 Demography remains the most cited journal among population studies and demographic periodicals. Published bimonthly, Demography is the flagship journal of the Population Association of America, reaching the membership of one of the largest professional demographic associations in the world.