术后x线在小儿桡骨远端骨折中的作用。

IF 2.3 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Ammar K Alomran, Bandar A Alzahrani, Dana S Alamoud, Layan S Alsultan, Meshail M AlSaud, Raneem G Althobaiti, Badriah S Alruwaili
{"title":"术后x线在小儿桡骨远端骨折中的作用。","authors":"Ammar K Alomran, Bandar A Alzahrani, Dana S Alamoud, Layan S Alsultan, Meshail M AlSaud, Raneem G Althobaiti, Badriah S Alruwaili","doi":"10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In pediatric age group patients (< 18 years old) treated operatively for distal radius/both bone fractures extending imaging beyond the initial postoperative period -particularly in uncomplicated cases - appears to provide limited additional benefit.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the necessary number of follow-up X-rays to use resources efficiently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included in this study are pediatric age group patients who were treated operatively for distal radius/both bone fractures and were identified from a prospected collected data from the operating room database between the years 2009 and 2017. The data in the study included patients who had distal radius fractures and underwent fixation surgery (<i>n</i> = 88).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When assessing the difference in the odds of conducting 1 or less X-ray compared to 2 or more X-rays in regard to the type of fixation, the only significant difference is the closed reduction fixation method. Patients who underwent closed reduction method procedure have significantly lower odds of having 2 more X-rays compared to those who didn't have closed reduction method. Open reduction, internal fixation, and other fixation methods (close reduction and internal fixation, debridement, or epiphysiodesis) have higher odds of having two or more X-rays compared to patients who did not receive these methods; however, these odds are not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study reveal notable absence of a statistically significant association between the frequency of postoperative X-rays and the outcome of children with distal radius fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":47843,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Orthopedics","volume":"16 5","pages":"105590"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of post-operative X-rays in distal-radius fractures among pediatric patients.\",\"authors\":\"Ammar K Alomran, Bandar A Alzahrani, Dana S Alamoud, Layan S Alsultan, Meshail M AlSaud, Raneem G Althobaiti, Badriah S Alruwaili\",\"doi\":\"10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In pediatric age group patients (< 18 years old) treated operatively for distal radius/both bone fractures extending imaging beyond the initial postoperative period -particularly in uncomplicated cases - appears to provide limited additional benefit.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the necessary number of follow-up X-rays to use resources efficiently.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants included in this study are pediatric age group patients who were treated operatively for distal radius/both bone fractures and were identified from a prospected collected data from the operating room database between the years 2009 and 2017. The data in the study included patients who had distal radius fractures and underwent fixation surgery (<i>n</i> = 88).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>When assessing the difference in the odds of conducting 1 or less X-ray compared to 2 or more X-rays in regard to the type of fixation, the only significant difference is the closed reduction fixation method. Patients who underwent closed reduction method procedure have significantly lower odds of having 2 more X-rays compared to those who didn't have closed reduction method. Open reduction, internal fixation, and other fixation methods (close reduction and internal fixation, debridement, or epiphysiodesis) have higher odds of having two or more X-rays compared to patients who did not receive these methods; however, these odds are not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study reveal notable absence of a statistically significant association between the frequency of postoperative X-rays and the outcome of children with distal radius fractures.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47843,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\"16 5\",\"pages\":\"105590\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146974/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105590\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v16.i5.105590","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在儿童年龄组(< 18岁)手术治疗桡骨远端/双侧骨折的患者中,延长成像时间超过术后初始期,特别是在无并发症的病例中,似乎提供有限的额外益处。目的:确定随访x线的必要次数,以有效利用资源。方法:本研究的参与者是2009年至2017年期间从手术室数据库收集的前瞻性数据中确定的手术治疗桡骨远端/双侧骨折的儿科年龄组患者。该研究的数据包括桡骨远端骨折并接受固定手术的患者(n = 88)。结果:在评估1次或更少x线透视与2次或更多x线透视在固定类型方面的差异时,唯一显著差异是闭合复位固定方法。与未接受闭合复位的患者相比,接受闭合复位的患者接受两次以上x光检查的几率明显较低。切开复位、内固定和其他固定方法(闭合复位和内固定、清创术或表皮成形术)与未接受这些方法的患者相比,接受两次或两次以上x光检查的几率更高;然而,这些几率在统计上并不显著。结论:本研究的结果显示,术后x线检查频率与儿童桡骨远端骨折的预后之间没有明显的统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Role of post-operative X-rays in distal-radius fractures among pediatric patients.

Role of post-operative X-rays in distal-radius fractures among pediatric patients.

Background: In pediatric age group patients (< 18 years old) treated operatively for distal radius/both bone fractures extending imaging beyond the initial postoperative period -particularly in uncomplicated cases - appears to provide limited additional benefit.

Aim: To determine the necessary number of follow-up X-rays to use resources efficiently.

Methods: Participants included in this study are pediatric age group patients who were treated operatively for distal radius/both bone fractures and were identified from a prospected collected data from the operating room database between the years 2009 and 2017. The data in the study included patients who had distal radius fractures and underwent fixation surgery (n = 88).

Results: When assessing the difference in the odds of conducting 1 or less X-ray compared to 2 or more X-rays in regard to the type of fixation, the only significant difference is the closed reduction fixation method. Patients who underwent closed reduction method procedure have significantly lower odds of having 2 more X-rays compared to those who didn't have closed reduction method. Open reduction, internal fixation, and other fixation methods (close reduction and internal fixation, debridement, or epiphysiodesis) have higher odds of having two or more X-rays compared to patients who did not receive these methods; however, these odds are not statistically significant.

Conclusion: The findings of this study reveal notable absence of a statistically significant association between the frequency of postoperative X-rays and the outcome of children with distal radius fractures.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
814
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信