基于机器学习的亚急性中风患者如厕相关活动独立性预测模型:一项回顾性研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION
Yuta Miyazaki, Michiyuki Kawakami, Kunitsugu Kondo, Akiko Hirabe, Takayuki Kamimoto, Tomonori Akimoto, Nanako Hijikata, Masahiro Tsujikawa, Kaoru Honaga, Kanjiro Suzuki, Tetsuya Tsuji
{"title":"基于机器学习的亚急性中风患者如厕相关活动独立性预测模型:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Yuta Miyazaki, Michiyuki Kawakami, Kunitsugu Kondo, Akiko Hirabe, Takayuki Kamimoto, Tomonori Akimoto, Nanako Hijikata, Masahiro Tsujikawa, Kaoru Honaga, Kanjiro Suzuki, Tetsuya Tsuji","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-learning-based prognostic models for independence in toilet-related activities in patients with subacute stroke: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Miyazaki, Michiyuki Kawakami, Kunitsugu Kondo, Akiko Hirabe, Takayuki Kamimoto, Tomonori Akimoto, Nanako Hijikata, Masahiro Tsujikawa, Kaoru Honaga, Kanjiro Suzuki, Tetsuya Tsuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与厕所相关活动的独立性对中风后出院计划和照顾者负担有重要影响。因此,可靠的早期预测模型有助于个性化康复。目的:比较逻辑回归(LR)和五种机器学习算法——决策树(DT)、支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)、k近邻(KNN)和集成学习(EL)——对小便相关独立性的预测性能。方法:回顾性分析2015年3月至2019年9月在东京湾康复医院住院的亚急性脑卒中幸存者。独立性定义为四个功能独立性测量(FIM)子项(如厕、膀胱管理、肠道管理、如厕)得分≥6分。参与者的特征和FIM子项被输入作为预测因子。LR和五种机器学习算法通过五倍交叉验证进行训练。模型的性能通过接受者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来评估。结果:在824名参与者(平均年龄70.9岁)中,453名(55%)在出院时独立。验证数据中,支持向量机(SVM)的AUC = 0.9223,其次是LR(0.9202)、ANN(0.9201)、KNN(0.9072)、EL(0.8961)和DT(0.8394)。在测试数据上,SVM和LR的auc分别保持在0.9101和0.9078,而ANN则下降到0.8922。EL(0.9021)和KNN(0.9020)保持稳定;DT(0.7864)表现最低。在LR中,FIM-Bed - to - chair transfer是最强的正向预测因子,而年龄是最强的负向预测因子。结论:SVM以最小的过度学习提供了最高的准确率。LR提供了类似的性能和更大的可解释性,支持其临床应用。这些模型可为脑卒中康复提供有价值的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Machine-learning-based prognostic models for independence in toilet-related activities in patients with subacute stroke: a retrospective study.

Background: Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.

Objective: To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).

Results: Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.

Conclusions: SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 医学-康复医学
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
57
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues. The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信