{"title":"基于机器学习的亚急性中风患者如厕相关活动独立性预测模型:一项回顾性研究。","authors":"Yuta Miyazaki, Michiyuki Kawakami, Kunitsugu Kondo, Akiko Hirabe, Takayuki Kamimoto, Tomonori Akimoto, Nanako Hijikata, Masahiro Tsujikawa, Kaoru Honaga, Kanjiro Suzuki, Tetsuya Tsuji","doi":"10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":23164,"journal":{"name":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Machine-learning-based prognostic models for independence in toilet-related activities in patients with subacute stroke: a retrospective study.\",\"authors\":\"Yuta Miyazaki, Michiyuki Kawakami, Kunitsugu Kondo, Akiko Hirabe, Takayuki Kamimoto, Tomonori Akimoto, Nanako Hijikata, Masahiro Tsujikawa, Kaoru Honaga, Kanjiro Suzuki, Tetsuya Tsuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2025.2516850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:与厕所相关活动的独立性对中风后出院计划和照顾者负担有重要影响。因此,可靠的早期预测模型有助于个性化康复。目的:比较逻辑回归(LR)和五种机器学习算法——决策树(DT)、支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)、k近邻(KNN)和集成学习(EL)——对小便相关独立性的预测性能。方法:回顾性分析2015年3月至2019年9月在东京湾康复医院住院的亚急性脑卒中幸存者。独立性定义为四个功能独立性测量(FIM)子项(如厕、膀胱管理、肠道管理、如厕)得分≥6分。参与者的特征和FIM子项被输入作为预测因子。LR和五种机器学习算法通过五倍交叉验证进行训练。模型的性能通过接受者操作特征曲线(AUC)下的面积来评估。结果:在824名参与者(平均年龄70.9岁)中,453名(55%)在出院时独立。验证数据中,支持向量机(SVM)的AUC = 0.9223,其次是LR(0.9202)、ANN(0.9201)、KNN(0.9072)、EL(0.8961)和DT(0.8394)。在测试数据上,SVM和LR的auc分别保持在0.9101和0.9078,而ANN则下降到0.8922。EL(0.9021)和KNN(0.9020)保持稳定;DT(0.7864)表现最低。在LR中,FIM-Bed - to - chair transfer是最强的正向预测因子,而年龄是最强的负向预测因子。结论:SVM以最小的过度学习提供了最高的准确率。LR提供了类似的性能和更大的可解释性,支持其临床应用。这些模型可为脑卒中康复提供有价值的信息。
Machine-learning-based prognostic models for independence in toilet-related activities in patients with subacute stroke: a retrospective study.
Background: Independence in toilet‑related activities critically shapes discharge planning and caregiver burden after stroke. Reliable early‑stage prediction models could therefore aid individualized rehabilitation.
Objective: To compare the predictive performance of logistic regression (LR) and five machine learning algorithms - decision tree (DT), support vector machine (SVM), artificial neural network (ANN), k‑nearest neighbors (KNN), and ensemble learning (EL) - for toilet-related independence at discharge.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed subacute stroke survivors admitted to Tokyo Bay Rehabilitation Hospital from March 2015 to September 2019. Independence was defined as a score ≥ 6 on four Functional Independence Measure (FIM) subitems (toileting, bladder management, bowel management, toilet transfers). Participants' characteristics and FIM subitems were entered as predictors. LR and five machine‑learning algorithms were trained with five‑fold cross‑validation. Model performances were evaluated by the area under the receiver‑operating‑characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: Of 824 participants (mean age 70.9 years), 453 (55%) were independent at discharge. In validation data, SVM (AUC = 0.9223) achieved, followed by LR (0.9202), ANN (0.9201), KNN (0.9072), EL (0.8961), and DT (0.8394). On test data, SVM and LR maintained AUCs of 0.9101 and 0.9078, whereas ANN declined to 0.8922. EL (0.9021) and KNN (0.9020) remained stable; DT (0.7864) performed the lowest. In LR, FIM-Bed to chair transfer was the strongest positive predictor, and age was the strongest negative predictor.
Conclusions: SVM provided the highest accuracy with minimal overlearning. LR offered similar performance and greater interpretability, supporting its clinical use. These models could provide valuable information in stroke rehabilitation.
期刊介绍:
Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation is the leading journal devoted to the study and dissemination of interdisciplinary, evidence-based, clinical information related to stroke rehabilitation. The journal’s scope covers physical medicine and rehabilitation, neurology, neurorehabilitation, neural engineering and therapeutics, neuropsychology and cognition, optimization of the rehabilitation system, robotics and biomechanics, pain management, nursing, physical therapy, cardiopulmonary fitness, mobility, occupational therapy, speech pathology and communication. There is a particular focus on stroke recovery, improving rehabilitation outcomes, quality of life, activities of daily living, motor control, family and care givers, and community issues.
The journal reviews and reports clinical practices, clinical trials, state-of-the-art concepts, and new developments in stroke research and patient care. Both primary research papers, reviews of existing literature, and invited editorials, are included. Sharply-focused, single-issue topics, and the latest in clinical research, provide in-depth knowledge.