脑啡肽的肾消除和eGFR预测。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Johann Sigurjonsson, Ulf Nyman, Henrik Bjursten, David Grubb
{"title":"脑啡肽的肾消除和eGFR预测。","authors":"Johann Sigurjonsson, Ulf Nyman, Henrik Bjursten, David Grubb","doi":"10.1080/00365513.2025.2512383","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Proenkephalin (PENK) is assumed to be freely filtered by the glomerulus, thus potentially useful for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Recently developed eGFR-equation based on PENK and creatinine has not been validated against existing cystatin C-based equations. This study aimed to test the hypothesis of free filtration of PENK. Also, the PENK-creatinine based eGFR-equation was validated against cystatin C. Plasma concentrations of PENK, creatinine and cystatin C were determined in arterial and renal venous blood samples collected from 70 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The renal elimination ratio (RER) of PENK (RER<sub>PENK</sub>) was calculated and compared to the RER of creatinine (RER<sub>crea</sub>). RER constitutes the single-pass renal elimination of a molecule, calculated as the arteriovenous concentration difference divided by the arterial concentration. For eGFR validations, the CAPA (cystatin C) and LMR (creatinine) equations were used. RER<sub>PENK</sub> (23.7 ± 9.6%) was approximately 10% higher than RER<sub>crea</sub> (21.4 ± 5.8%). The PENK-creatinine equation overestimated GFR by 26,1% on average, compared to the mean of the LMR and CAPA equations. The relationship between RER<sub>PENK</sub> and RER<sub>crea</sub> suggests free filtration and a slight degree of non-glomerular elimination of PENK. There was poor agreement between PENK and cystatin C derived eGFR-equations. PENK needs further evaluation as a predictor of GFR.</p>","PeriodicalId":21474,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Renal elimination and eGFR prediction of proenkephalin.\",\"authors\":\"Johann Sigurjonsson, Ulf Nyman, Henrik Bjursten, David Grubb\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00365513.2025.2512383\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Proenkephalin (PENK) is assumed to be freely filtered by the glomerulus, thus potentially useful for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Recently developed eGFR-equation based on PENK and creatinine has not been validated against existing cystatin C-based equations. This study aimed to test the hypothesis of free filtration of PENK. Also, the PENK-creatinine based eGFR-equation was validated against cystatin C. Plasma concentrations of PENK, creatinine and cystatin C were determined in arterial and renal venous blood samples collected from 70 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The renal elimination ratio (RER) of PENK (RER<sub>PENK</sub>) was calculated and compared to the RER of creatinine (RER<sub>crea</sub>). RER constitutes the single-pass renal elimination of a molecule, calculated as the arteriovenous concentration difference divided by the arterial concentration. For eGFR validations, the CAPA (cystatin C) and LMR (creatinine) equations were used. RER<sub>PENK</sub> (23.7 ± 9.6%) was approximately 10% higher than RER<sub>crea</sub> (21.4 ± 5.8%). The PENK-creatinine equation overestimated GFR by 26,1% on average, compared to the mean of the LMR and CAPA equations. The relationship between RER<sub>PENK</sub> and RER<sub>crea</sub> suggests free filtration and a slight degree of non-glomerular elimination of PENK. There was poor agreement between PENK and cystatin C derived eGFR-equations. PENK needs further evaluation as a predictor of GFR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2512383\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Clinical & Laboratory Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2025.2512383","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预脑啡肽(PENK)被认为可以被肾小球自由过滤,因此可能有助于估计肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。最近开发的基于PENK和肌酐的egfr方程尚未与现有的基于胱抑素c的方程进行验证。本研究旨在验证PENK的自由过滤假说。同时,对70例经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)患者的动脉和肾静脉血样本进行PENK、肌酐和胱抑素C的血浆浓度测定,验证了基于PENK-肌酐的egfr方程。计算PENK (RERPENK)的肾消除比(RER),并与肌酐(RERcrea)的RER进行比较。RER构成一种分子的单次肾消除,计算方法为动静脉浓度差除以动脉浓度。对于eGFR的验证,使用CAPA(胱抑素C)和LMR(肌酐)方程。RERPENK(23.7±9.6%)比RERcrea(21.4±5.8%)高约10%。与LMR和CAPA方程的平均值相比,penk -肌酐方程平均高估了GFR 26.1%。RERPENK和RERcrea之间的关系提示自由滤过和轻微程度的PENK非肾小球消除。PENK和胱抑素C推导的egfr方程之间的一致性很差。PENK作为GFR的预测指标需要进一步评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Renal elimination and eGFR prediction of proenkephalin.

Proenkephalin (PENK) is assumed to be freely filtered by the glomerulus, thus potentially useful for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Recently developed eGFR-equation based on PENK and creatinine has not been validated against existing cystatin C-based equations. This study aimed to test the hypothesis of free filtration of PENK. Also, the PENK-creatinine based eGFR-equation was validated against cystatin C. Plasma concentrations of PENK, creatinine and cystatin C were determined in arterial and renal venous blood samples collected from 70 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The renal elimination ratio (RER) of PENK (RERPENK) was calculated and compared to the RER of creatinine (RERcrea). RER constitutes the single-pass renal elimination of a molecule, calculated as the arteriovenous concentration difference divided by the arterial concentration. For eGFR validations, the CAPA (cystatin C) and LMR (creatinine) equations were used. RERPENK (23.7 ± 9.6%) was approximately 10% higher than RERcrea (21.4 ± 5.8%). The PENK-creatinine equation overestimated GFR by 26,1% on average, compared to the mean of the LMR and CAPA equations. The relationship between RERPENK and RERcrea suggests free filtration and a slight degree of non-glomerular elimination of PENK. There was poor agreement between PENK and cystatin C derived eGFR-equations. PENK needs further evaluation as a predictor of GFR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
85
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation is an international scientific journal covering clinically oriented biochemical and physiological research. Since the launch of the journal in 1949, it has been a forum for international laboratory medicine, closely related to, and edited by, The Scandinavian Society for Clinical Chemistry. The journal contains peer-reviewed articles, editorials, invited reviews, and short technical notes, as well as several supplements each year. Supplements consist of monographs, and symposium and congress reports covering subjects within clinical chemistry and clinical physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信