评估运动皮质活动:重复如何影响运动执行和图像分析。

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Marta Borràs, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Joan F Alonso, Alejandro Bachiller, Miguel A Mañanas, Mónica Rojas
{"title":"评估运动皮质活动:重复如何影响运动执行和图像分析。","authors":"Marta Borràs, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Joan F Alonso, Alejandro Bachiller, Miguel A Mañanas, Mónica Rojas","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of motor-related cortical activity is crucial for analyzing brain behavior during motor execution (ME) and imagery (MI). Improving motor learning and recovery in patients with motor disorders involves both ME and MI. Although ME and MI share the same motor brain network, multiple studies show differences in motor-related cortical activity regarding amplitude, timing, and fatigue. Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) are key motor-related cortical activities in time and frequency domains. These are used to characterize and monitor neuromotor pathologies through averaging techniques. However, a sufficient number of trials is needed for cortical activity averaging, which may prolong tasks and induce patient fatigue, potentially affecting the results. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of the number of trials on MRCPs and ERD mu and beta bands during upper-limb movements: elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, and hand open/close. Differences between ME and MI were assessed using Monte Carlo analysis of motor-related cortical features, scalp topography activity, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The impact of reduced trials varied by movement and feature. Certain differences between ME and MI became statistically nonsignificant with fewer trials. Hand opening/closing and ERD in the mu band were most sensitive to reduced trials. Results were supported by topographic maps and LORETA images, linking reduced trials to increased intersubject variability. These findings highlight the need for an optimal number of trials to ensure reliable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Motor Cortical Activity: How Repetitions Impact Motor Execution and Imagery Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Borràs, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Joan F Alonso, Alejandro Bachiller, Miguel A Mañanas, Mónica Rojas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study of motor-related cortical activity is crucial for analyzing brain behavior during motor execution (ME) and imagery (MI). Improving motor learning and recovery in patients with motor disorders involves both ME and MI. Although ME and MI share the same motor brain network, multiple studies show differences in motor-related cortical activity regarding amplitude, timing, and fatigue. Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) are key motor-related cortical activities in time and frequency domains. These are used to characterize and monitor neuromotor pathologies through averaging techniques. However, a sufficient number of trials is needed for cortical activity averaging, which may prolong tasks and induce patient fatigue, potentially affecting the results. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of the number of trials on MRCPs and ERD mu and beta bands during upper-limb movements: elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, and hand open/close. Differences between ME and MI were assessed using Monte Carlo analysis of motor-related cortical features, scalp topography activity, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The impact of reduced trials varied by movement and feature. Certain differences between ME and MI became statistically nonsignificant with fewer trials. Hand opening/closing and ERD in the mu band were most sensitive to reduced trials. Results were supported by topographic maps and LORETA images, linking reduced trials to increased intersubject variability. These findings highlight the need for an optimal number of trials to ensure reliable outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"e70090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

运动相关皮层活动的研究对于分析运动执行(ME)和想象(MI)过程中的大脑行为至关重要。改善运动障碍患者的运动学习和恢复涉及ME和MI。尽管ME和MI具有相同的运动脑网络,但多项研究表明,在振幅、时间和疲劳方面,运动相关皮层活动存在差异。运动相关皮层电位(MRCPs)和事件相关去同步(ERD)是运动相关皮层活动在时间和频率域的关键。这些是用来表征和监测神经运动病理通过平均技术。然而,皮质活动平均需要足够数量的试验,这可能会延长任务并引起患者疲劳,潜在地影响结果。本研究的目的是分析上肢运动(肘关节屈曲/伸展、前臂旋前/旋后和手张开/闭合)中MRCPs和ERD mu和β带的试验次数的影响。使用蒙特卡罗分析运动相关皮层特征、头皮地形活动和低分辨率电磁断层扫描(LORETA)来评估ME和MI之间的差异。减少试验的影响因运动和特征而异。随着试验的减少,ME和MI之间的某些差异在统计学上变得不显著。手的开合和ERD在mu波段对减少试验最敏感。结果得到了地形图和LORETA图像的支持,将减少的试验与增加的学科间变异性联系起来。这些发现强调了需要最佳数量的试验来确保可靠的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing Motor Cortical Activity: How Repetitions Impact Motor Execution and Imagery Analysis.

The study of motor-related cortical activity is crucial for analyzing brain behavior during motor execution (ME) and imagery (MI). Improving motor learning and recovery in patients with motor disorders involves both ME and MI. Although ME and MI share the same motor brain network, multiple studies show differences in motor-related cortical activity regarding amplitude, timing, and fatigue. Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) are key motor-related cortical activities in time and frequency domains. These are used to characterize and monitor neuromotor pathologies through averaging techniques. However, a sufficient number of trials is needed for cortical activity averaging, which may prolong tasks and induce patient fatigue, potentially affecting the results. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of the number of trials on MRCPs and ERD mu and beta bands during upper-limb movements: elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, and hand open/close. Differences between ME and MI were assessed using Monte Carlo analysis of motor-related cortical features, scalp topography activity, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The impact of reduced trials varied by movement and feature. Certain differences between ME and MI became statistically nonsignificant with fewer trials. Hand opening/closing and ERD in the mu band were most sensitive to reduced trials. Results were supported by topographic maps and LORETA images, linking reduced trials to increased intersubject variability. These findings highlight the need for an optimal number of trials to ensure reliable outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychophysiology
Psychophysiology 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.10%
发文量
225
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信