Marta Borràs, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Joan F Alonso, Alejandro Bachiller, Miguel A Mañanas, Mónica Rojas
{"title":"评估运动皮质活动:重复如何影响运动执行和图像分析。","authors":"Marta Borràs, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Joan F Alonso, Alejandro Bachiller, Miguel A Mañanas, Mónica Rojas","doi":"10.1111/psyp.70090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The study of motor-related cortical activity is crucial for analyzing brain behavior during motor execution (ME) and imagery (MI). Improving motor learning and recovery in patients with motor disorders involves both ME and MI. Although ME and MI share the same motor brain network, multiple studies show differences in motor-related cortical activity regarding amplitude, timing, and fatigue. Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) are key motor-related cortical activities in time and frequency domains. These are used to characterize and monitor neuromotor pathologies through averaging techniques. However, a sufficient number of trials is needed for cortical activity averaging, which may prolong tasks and induce patient fatigue, potentially affecting the results. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of the number of trials on MRCPs and ERD mu and beta bands during upper-limb movements: elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, and hand open/close. Differences between ME and MI were assessed using Monte Carlo analysis of motor-related cortical features, scalp topography activity, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The impact of reduced trials varied by movement and feature. Certain differences between ME and MI became statistically nonsignificant with fewer trials. Hand opening/closing and ERD in the mu band were most sensitive to reduced trials. Results were supported by topographic maps and LORETA images, linking reduced trials to increased intersubject variability. These findings highlight the need for an optimal number of trials to ensure reliable outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":20913,"journal":{"name":"Psychophysiology","volume":"62 6","pages":"e70090"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152408/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Motor Cortical Activity: How Repetitions Impact Motor Execution and Imagery Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Marta Borràs, Sergio Romero, Leidy Y Serna, Joan F Alonso, Alejandro Bachiller, Miguel A Mañanas, Mónica Rojas\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyp.70090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The study of motor-related cortical activity is crucial for analyzing brain behavior during motor execution (ME) and imagery (MI). Improving motor learning and recovery in patients with motor disorders involves both ME and MI. Although ME and MI share the same motor brain network, multiple studies show differences in motor-related cortical activity regarding amplitude, timing, and fatigue. Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) are key motor-related cortical activities in time and frequency domains. These are used to characterize and monitor neuromotor pathologies through averaging techniques. However, a sufficient number of trials is needed for cortical activity averaging, which may prolong tasks and induce patient fatigue, potentially affecting the results. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of the number of trials on MRCPs and ERD mu and beta bands during upper-limb movements: elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, and hand open/close. Differences between ME and MI were assessed using Monte Carlo analysis of motor-related cortical features, scalp topography activity, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The impact of reduced trials varied by movement and feature. Certain differences between ME and MI became statistically nonsignificant with fewer trials. Hand opening/closing and ERD in the mu band were most sensitive to reduced trials. Results were supported by topographic maps and LORETA images, linking reduced trials to increased intersubject variability. These findings highlight the need for an optimal number of trials to ensure reliable outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20913,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"volume\":\"62 6\",\"pages\":\"e70090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152408/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychophysiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.70090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Motor Cortical Activity: How Repetitions Impact Motor Execution and Imagery Analysis.
The study of motor-related cortical activity is crucial for analyzing brain behavior during motor execution (ME) and imagery (MI). Improving motor learning and recovery in patients with motor disorders involves both ME and MI. Although ME and MI share the same motor brain network, multiple studies show differences in motor-related cortical activity regarding amplitude, timing, and fatigue. Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) and event-related desynchronization (ERD) are key motor-related cortical activities in time and frequency domains. These are used to characterize and monitor neuromotor pathologies through averaging techniques. However, a sufficient number of trials is needed for cortical activity averaging, which may prolong tasks and induce patient fatigue, potentially affecting the results. The aim of this work was to analyze the effect of the number of trials on MRCPs and ERD mu and beta bands during upper-limb movements: elbow flexion/extension, forearm pronation/supination, and hand open/close. Differences between ME and MI were assessed using Monte Carlo analysis of motor-related cortical features, scalp topography activity, and low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LORETA). The impact of reduced trials varied by movement and feature. Certain differences between ME and MI became statistically nonsignificant with fewer trials. Hand opening/closing and ERD in the mu band were most sensitive to reduced trials. Results were supported by topographic maps and LORETA images, linking reduced trials to increased intersubject variability. These findings highlight the need for an optimal number of trials to ensure reliable outcomes.
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1964, Psychophysiology is the most established journal in the world specifically dedicated to the dissemination of psychophysiological science. The journal continues to play a key role in advancing human neuroscience in its many forms and methodologies (including central and peripheral measures), covering research on the interrelationships between the physiological and psychological aspects of brain and behavior. Typically, studies published in Psychophysiology include psychological independent variables and noninvasive physiological dependent variables (hemodynamic, optical, and electromagnetic brain imaging and/or peripheral measures such as respiratory sinus arrhythmia, electromyography, pupillography, and many others). The majority of studies published in the journal involve human participants, but work using animal models of such phenomena is occasionally published. Psychophysiology welcomes submissions on new theoretical, empirical, and methodological advances in: cognitive, affective, clinical and social neuroscience, psychopathology and psychiatry, health science and behavioral medicine, and biomedical engineering. The journal publishes theoretical papers, evaluative reviews of literature, empirical papers, and methodological papers, with submissions welcome from scientists in any fields mentioned above.