新(白人)标准:1860-1910年英国大学教学中的人体解剖学和白人身体的归化。

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q1 HISTORY
Social History of Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-11 eCollection Date: 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1093/shm/hkae049
Rebecca Martin
{"title":"新(白人)标准:1860-1910年英国大学教学中的人体解剖学和白人身体的归化。","authors":"Rebecca Martin","doi":"10.1093/shm/hkae049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The discipline of human anatomy has often been overlooked in histories of race science in favour of comparative anatomy, anthropology, ethnography and statistics. However, understanding the historical relationship between human anatomy and race science is particularly important because of the discipline's central role, unlike its sister disciplines, in medical education. This article begins to redress this oversight, demonstrating that human anatomy played a key role in the development of nineteenth-century race science in Britain. This article considers three main elements of ideas about racial anatomical difference: the language of racial hierarchy, anatomists' location of racial difference within the body and the perpetuation of these ideas over time. In so doing, I argue that research into racial difference was demonstrably anatomical during the late nineteenth century, playing a key role in British anatomists' discipline-building processes, and that these ideas were present within the classroom, influencing generations of medical students.</p>","PeriodicalId":21922,"journal":{"name":"Social History of Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"127-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146253/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The New (White) Normal: Human Anatomy and the Naturalisation of White Bodies in British University Teaching, 1860-1910.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca Martin\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/shm/hkae049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The discipline of human anatomy has often been overlooked in histories of race science in favour of comparative anatomy, anthropology, ethnography and statistics. However, understanding the historical relationship between human anatomy and race science is particularly important because of the discipline's central role, unlike its sister disciplines, in medical education. This article begins to redress this oversight, demonstrating that human anatomy played a key role in the development of nineteenth-century race science in Britain. This article considers three main elements of ideas about racial anatomical difference: the language of racial hierarchy, anatomists' location of racial difference within the body and the perpetuation of these ideas over time. In so doing, I argue that research into racial difference was demonstrably anatomical during the late nineteenth century, playing a key role in British anatomists' discipline-building processes, and that these ideas were present within the classroom, influencing generations of medical students.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social History of Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"127-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12146253/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social History of Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkae049\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/2/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social History of Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/shm/hkae049","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在种族科学史中,人类解剖学经常被忽视,而比较解剖学、人类学、民族志和统计学更受青睐。然而,了解人体解剖学和种族科学之间的历史关系尤为重要,因为这门学科在医学教育中的核心作用,与其姊妹学科不同。这篇文章开始纠正这种疏忽,证明人体解剖学在19世纪英国种族科学的发展中发挥了关键作用。本文考虑了种族解剖学差异观点的三个主要因素:种族等级的语言,解剖学家对种族差异在身体中的定位以及这些观点随着时间的推移而延续。在这样做的过程中,我认为,对种族差异的研究在19世纪晚期明显是解剖学的,在英国解剖学家的学科建设过程中发挥了关键作用,这些观点在课堂上出现,影响了几代医学生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The New (White) Normal: Human Anatomy and the Naturalisation of White Bodies in British University Teaching, 1860-1910.

The discipline of human anatomy has often been overlooked in histories of race science in favour of comparative anatomy, anthropology, ethnography and statistics. However, understanding the historical relationship between human anatomy and race science is particularly important because of the discipline's central role, unlike its sister disciplines, in medical education. This article begins to redress this oversight, demonstrating that human anatomy played a key role in the development of nineteenth-century race science in Britain. This article considers three main elements of ideas about racial anatomical difference: the language of racial hierarchy, anatomists' location of racial difference within the body and the perpetuation of these ideas over time. In so doing, I argue that research into racial difference was demonstrably anatomical during the late nineteenth century, playing a key role in British anatomists' discipline-building processes, and that these ideas were present within the classroom, influencing generations of medical students.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social History of Medicine
Social History of Medicine 社会科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Social History of Medicine , the journal of the Society for the Social History of Medicine, is concerned with all aspects of health, illness, and medical treatment in the past. It is committed to publishing work on the social history of medicine from a variety of disciplines. The journal offers its readers substantive and lively articles on a variety of themes, critical assessments of archives and sources, conference reports, up-to-date information on research in progress, a discussion point on topics of current controversy and concern, review articles, and wide-ranging book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信