关节内注射阿片类药物治疗颞下颌关节痛觉的疗效:系统综述。

IF 1.5 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Pain management Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1080/17581869.2025.2517523
Madhuli Bhide, P Emile Rossouw, Fawad Javed
{"title":"关节内注射阿片类药物治疗颞下颌关节痛觉的疗效:系统综述。","authors":"Madhuli Bhide, P Emile Rossouw, Fawad Javed","doi":"10.1080/17581869.2025.2517523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of intra-articular opioid injections for managing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of indexed databases and Google Scholar was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies assessed self-reported TMJ pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO) as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, with follow-up periods ranging from 30 minutes to 6 months. Six trials demonstrated significant pain reduction after opioid injections, while one reported no difference following morphine use. Another study found mepivacaine more effective than morphine or saline. Regarding MMO, one trial showed no effect of morphine, whereas two trials found that 1 mg morphine or 1 ml buprenorphine led to greater improvements than 0.1 mg morphine. In three trials, opioids enhanced MMO more than sodium hyaluronate. All studies exhibited low RoB. Certainty of evidence was moderate in six RCTs and low in three.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no credible evidence for the benefit of intra-articular opioid-injections for managing TMJ nociception.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.tork.ac.uk/prospero identified is CRD42024598035.</p>","PeriodicalId":20000,"journal":{"name":"Pain management","volume":" ","pages":"441-447"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218567/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of intra-articular opioid injections for managing temporomandibular joint nociception: a systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Madhuli Bhide, P Emile Rossouw, Fawad Javed\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17581869.2025.2517523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of intra-articular opioid injections for managing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A comprehensive search of indexed databases and Google Scholar was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies assessed self-reported TMJ pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO) as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, with follow-up periods ranging from 30 minutes to 6 months. Six trials demonstrated significant pain reduction after opioid injections, while one reported no difference following morphine use. Another study found mepivacaine more effective than morphine or saline. Regarding MMO, one trial showed no effect of morphine, whereas two trials found that 1 mg morphine or 1 ml buprenorphine led to greater improvements than 0.1 mg morphine. In three trials, opioids enhanced MMO more than sodium hyaluronate. All studies exhibited low RoB. Certainty of evidence was moderate in six RCTs and low in three.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is no credible evidence for the benefit of intra-articular opioid-injections for managing TMJ nociception.</p><p><strong>Protocol registration: </strong>www.crd.tork.ac.uk/prospero identified is CRD42024598035.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pain management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"441-447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12218567/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pain management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2517523\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17581869.2025.2517523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本系统综述评价了随机对照试验(rct),研究了关节内注射阿片类药物治疗颞下颌关节(TMJ)疼痛的有效性。方法:按照PRISMA指南,对索引数据库和谷歌Scholar进行全面检索。纳入的研究分别评估了自我报告的TMJ疼痛和最大张嘴(MMO)作为主要和次要结果。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险(RoB),使用GRADE框架评估证据确定性。结果:10项rct符合纳入标准,随访时间从30分钟到6个月不等。六项试验显示阿片类药物注射后疼痛明显减轻,而一项试验报告使用吗啡后没有差异。另一项研究发现甲哌卡因比吗啡或生理盐水更有效。关于MMO,一项试验显示吗啡没有作用,而两项试验发现1mg吗啡或1ml丁丙诺啡比0.1 mg吗啡有更大的改善。在三项试验中,阿片类药物比透明质酸钠更能增强MMO。所有研究均显示较低的RoB。6项随机对照试验的证据确定性为中等,3项为低。结论:没有可靠的证据表明关节内注射阿片类药物对治疗颞下颌关节痛觉有好处。协议注册:www.crd.tork.ac.uk/prospero识别为CRD42024598035。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of intra-articular opioid injections for managing temporomandibular joint nociception: a systematic review.

Aim: This systematic review evaluated randomized controlled trials (RCTs) investigating the effectiveness of intra-articular opioid injections for managing temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain.

Methods: A comprehensive search of indexed databases and Google Scholar was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Included studies assessed self-reported TMJ pain and maximum mouth opening (MMO) as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. Risk of bias (RoB) was evaluated using the Cochrane tool, and evidence certainty was rated using the GRADE framework.

Results: Ten RCTs met the inclusion criteria, with follow-up periods ranging from 30 minutes to 6 months. Six trials demonstrated significant pain reduction after opioid injections, while one reported no difference following morphine use. Another study found mepivacaine more effective than morphine or saline. Regarding MMO, one trial showed no effect of morphine, whereas two trials found that 1 mg morphine or 1 ml buprenorphine led to greater improvements than 0.1 mg morphine. In three trials, opioids enhanced MMO more than sodium hyaluronate. All studies exhibited low RoB. Certainty of evidence was moderate in six RCTs and low in three.

Conclusion: There is no credible evidence for the benefit of intra-articular opioid-injections for managing TMJ nociception.

Protocol registration: www.crd.tork.ac.uk/prospero identified is CRD42024598035.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pain management
Pain management CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
5.90%
发文量
62
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信