Clara Carrión-González, Andrea Martínez-Santarrufina, Carlos Libio Escrivá-Estellés, Lukas Verderber, Inmaculada Aparicio-Aparicio, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada
{"title":"肌肉损伤24 h后皮肤血流量和皮肤温度。","authors":"Clara Carrión-González, Andrea Martínez-Santarrufina, Carlos Libio Escrivá-Estellés, Lukas Verderber, Inmaculada Aparicio-Aparicio, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Infrared thermography is a noninvasive tool to monitor muscle damage, though its effectiveness is debated, as some studies report no skin temperature changes 24-48 h post-damage. These findings are often attributed to skin blood flow, but there is a lack of studies assessing this outcome. This study aimed to assess baseline skin temperature and skin blood flow responses 24 h after an induced quadriceps damage protocol and to establish a possible relationship between both variables. The thigh skin temperature and skin blood flow, pain perception, serum creatine kinase, and height of countermovement jump were measured in 15 physically active adults over 4 days, on two consecutive days per week. The induced muscle damage protocol, based on 100 drop jumps, was performed on the third day. Higher serum creatine kinase and pain perception (p < 0.01, ES > 1.20) were found 24 h after muscle damage induction. Thigh skin temperature and skin blood flow were unaffected by the muscle damage protocol, and a moderate correlation was observed between both outcomes (r = 0.59). We conclude that muscle damage does not alter skin blood flow 24 h after the induction, and therefore, this also had no consequences on skin temperature.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 11","pages":"e70410"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151877/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin blood flow and skin temperature 24 h after induced muscle damage.\",\"authors\":\"Clara Carrión-González, Andrea Martínez-Santarrufina, Carlos Libio Escrivá-Estellés, Lukas Verderber, Inmaculada Aparicio-Aparicio, Jose Ignacio Priego-Quesada\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70410\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Infrared thermography is a noninvasive tool to monitor muscle damage, though its effectiveness is debated, as some studies report no skin temperature changes 24-48 h post-damage. These findings are often attributed to skin blood flow, but there is a lack of studies assessing this outcome. This study aimed to assess baseline skin temperature and skin blood flow responses 24 h after an induced quadriceps damage protocol and to establish a possible relationship between both variables. The thigh skin temperature and skin blood flow, pain perception, serum creatine kinase, and height of countermovement jump were measured in 15 physically active adults over 4 days, on two consecutive days per week. The induced muscle damage protocol, based on 100 drop jumps, was performed on the third day. Higher serum creatine kinase and pain perception (p < 0.01, ES > 1.20) were found 24 h after muscle damage induction. Thigh skin temperature and skin blood flow were unaffected by the muscle damage protocol, and a moderate correlation was observed between both outcomes (r = 0.59). We conclude that muscle damage does not alter skin blood flow 24 h after the induction, and therefore, this also had no consequences on skin temperature.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 11\",\"pages\":\"e70410\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151877/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70410\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Skin blood flow and skin temperature 24 h after induced muscle damage.
Infrared thermography is a noninvasive tool to monitor muscle damage, though its effectiveness is debated, as some studies report no skin temperature changes 24-48 h post-damage. These findings are often attributed to skin blood flow, but there is a lack of studies assessing this outcome. This study aimed to assess baseline skin temperature and skin blood flow responses 24 h after an induced quadriceps damage protocol and to establish a possible relationship between both variables. The thigh skin temperature and skin blood flow, pain perception, serum creatine kinase, and height of countermovement jump were measured in 15 physically active adults over 4 days, on two consecutive days per week. The induced muscle damage protocol, based on 100 drop jumps, was performed on the third day. Higher serum creatine kinase and pain perception (p < 0.01, ES > 1.20) were found 24 h after muscle damage induction. Thigh skin temperature and skin blood flow were unaffected by the muscle damage protocol, and a moderate correlation was observed between both outcomes (r = 0.59). We conclude that muscle damage does not alter skin blood flow 24 h after the induction, and therefore, this also had no consequences on skin temperature.
期刊介绍:
Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.