围手术期液体治疗损害雄性大鼠淋巴泵功能。

IF 2.2 Q3 PHYSIOLOGY
Rebecca C Harlow-Adamek, Reetu Singh, Randolph H Stewart, Cristine L Heaps, Glen A Laine, Charles S Cox, Ranjeet M Dongaonkar
{"title":"围手术期液体治疗损害雄性大鼠淋巴泵功能。","authors":"Rebecca C Harlow-Adamek, Reetu Singh, Randolph H Stewart, Cristine L Heaps, Glen A Laine, Charles S Cox, Ranjeet M Dongaonkar","doi":"10.14814/phy2.70389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Because of its life-saving benefits, perioperative IV fluid therapy remains a cornerstone of medical treatment. However, it also induces sustained edemagenic stress. The resulting persistent interstitial edema-excessive fluid accumulation in the interstitium-significantly delays recovery and worsens patient outcomes. Therefore, to gain a detailed understanding of the lymphatic functional consequences of perioperative fluid therapy, this study aimed to test the hypothesis that perioperative IV fluid therapy compromises lymphatic pump function within 3 days after major surgery. Following a midline laparotomy, animals received IV fluid therapy over 48 h during recovery (FLTP). Three days post-surgery, mesenteric lymphatic vessels from FLTP and sham surgery (CTRL) animals were isolated, and lymphatic pump function was assessed in vitro. The transmural pressure-pump flow and circumferential length-wall tension relationships of FLTP vessels were altered-contraction frequency and normalized pump flow and active and passive wall tensions were significantly lower than CTRL. In vessels from another group of animals with surgically produced mesenteric venous hypertension to induce sustained edemagenic stress, only the pressure-pump flow relationship was altered similarly to FLTP. These results demonstrate the detrimental effects of perioperative fluid therapy on lymphatic pumping, which is essential for restoring interstitial fluid pressure and resolving edema and inflammation.</p>","PeriodicalId":20083,"journal":{"name":"Physiological Reports","volume":"13 11","pages":"e70389"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151903/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perioperative fluid therapy impairs lymphatic pump function in male rats.\",\"authors\":\"Rebecca C Harlow-Adamek, Reetu Singh, Randolph H Stewart, Cristine L Heaps, Glen A Laine, Charles S Cox, Ranjeet M Dongaonkar\",\"doi\":\"10.14814/phy2.70389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Because of its life-saving benefits, perioperative IV fluid therapy remains a cornerstone of medical treatment. However, it also induces sustained edemagenic stress. The resulting persistent interstitial edema-excessive fluid accumulation in the interstitium-significantly delays recovery and worsens patient outcomes. Therefore, to gain a detailed understanding of the lymphatic functional consequences of perioperative fluid therapy, this study aimed to test the hypothesis that perioperative IV fluid therapy compromises lymphatic pump function within 3 days after major surgery. Following a midline laparotomy, animals received IV fluid therapy over 48 h during recovery (FLTP). Three days post-surgery, mesenteric lymphatic vessels from FLTP and sham surgery (CTRL) animals were isolated, and lymphatic pump function was assessed in vitro. The transmural pressure-pump flow and circumferential length-wall tension relationships of FLTP vessels were altered-contraction frequency and normalized pump flow and active and passive wall tensions were significantly lower than CTRL. In vessels from another group of animals with surgically produced mesenteric venous hypertension to induce sustained edemagenic stress, only the pressure-pump flow relationship was altered similarly to FLTP. These results demonstrate the detrimental effects of perioperative fluid therapy on lymphatic pumping, which is essential for restoring interstitial fluid pressure and resolving edema and inflammation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20083,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"volume\":\"13 11\",\"pages\":\"e70389\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12151903/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physiological Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14814/phy2.70389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于其挽救生命的好处,围手术期静脉输液治疗仍然是医学治疗的基石。然而,它也会引起持续的水肿压力。由此产生的持续间质水肿-间质中过多的液体积聚-显著延迟恢复并恶化患者预后。因此,为了详细了解围手术期液体治疗对淋巴功能的影响,本研究旨在验证围手术期静脉液体治疗在大手术后3天内损害淋巴泵功能的假设。在中线剖腹手术后,动物在恢复期间接受静脉输液治疗48小时(FLTP)。术后3 d,分离FLTP和假手术(CTRL)动物肠系膜淋巴管,体外评估淋巴泵功能。FLTP血管的跨壁压力-泵流量和周向长壁张力关系发生改变——收缩频率和归一化泵流量以及主动和被动壁张力显著低于CTRL。在另一组手术产生肠系膜静脉高压以诱导持续水肿应激的动物血管中,只有压力-泵流量关系发生类似于FLTP的改变。这些结果表明围手术期液体治疗对淋巴泵的不利影响,而淋巴泵对于恢复间质液压力和缓解水肿和炎症至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perioperative fluid therapy impairs lymphatic pump function in male rats.

Because of its life-saving benefits, perioperative IV fluid therapy remains a cornerstone of medical treatment. However, it also induces sustained edemagenic stress. The resulting persistent interstitial edema-excessive fluid accumulation in the interstitium-significantly delays recovery and worsens patient outcomes. Therefore, to gain a detailed understanding of the lymphatic functional consequences of perioperative fluid therapy, this study aimed to test the hypothesis that perioperative IV fluid therapy compromises lymphatic pump function within 3 days after major surgery. Following a midline laparotomy, animals received IV fluid therapy over 48 h during recovery (FLTP). Three days post-surgery, mesenteric lymphatic vessels from FLTP and sham surgery (CTRL) animals were isolated, and lymphatic pump function was assessed in vitro. The transmural pressure-pump flow and circumferential length-wall tension relationships of FLTP vessels were altered-contraction frequency and normalized pump flow and active and passive wall tensions were significantly lower than CTRL. In vessels from another group of animals with surgically produced mesenteric venous hypertension to induce sustained edemagenic stress, only the pressure-pump flow relationship was altered similarly to FLTP. These results demonstrate the detrimental effects of perioperative fluid therapy on lymphatic pumping, which is essential for restoring interstitial fluid pressure and resolving edema and inflammation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Physiological Reports
Physiological Reports PHYSIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.00%
发文量
374
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Physiological Reports is an online only, open access journal that will publish peer reviewed research across all areas of basic, translational, and clinical physiology and allied disciplines. Physiological Reports is a collaboration between The Physiological Society and the American Physiological Society, and is therefore in a unique position to serve the international physiology community through quick time to publication while upholding a quality standard of sound research that constitutes a useful contribution to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信