首尔地区小学植物性膳食营养质量评价。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-29 DOI:10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.453
So-Young Kim, Meeyoung Kim
{"title":"首尔地区小学植物性膳食营养质量评价。","authors":"So-Young Kim, Meeyoung Kim","doi":"10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the nutritional quality of plant-based school meals by comparing plant-based and regular menus in Seoul's elementary schools.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>Nutrient information for plant-based and regular menus (Monday-Friday) was collected from school websites during a designated week in June 2023 when plant-based meals were offered. The analysis included 1,526 menus (321 plant-based, 1,205 regular) from 313 of 608 schools. Average energy and nutrient content were calculated for both menu types, along with the proportion of schools meeting the nutritional standards for school meals provided by the Ministry of Education in South Korea. Statistical analyses included χ<sup>2</sup> tests, Fisher's exact test, and <i>t</i>-tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of energy and nutrient content in both menu types revealed that all nutrients, except vitamin C, met or exceeded the nutritional standards for school meals. However, plant-based menus provided significantly lower levels of energy, protein, fat, thiamine, and vitamin C, and higher levels of carbohydrates, calcium, and iron compared to regular menus. While the macronutrient energy distributions of both menu types were within recommended ranges, plant-based menus tended to have higher carbohydrate ratios and lower protein and fat ratios. Furthermore, schools were more likely to serve plant-based menus that fell short of the nutritional standards for several nutrients. Some plant-based menus were identified as nutritionally unbalanced, revealing fundamental shortcomings in menu design-particularly an overreliance on carbohydrate- and fat-rich foods as staples, side dishes, and desserts, as well as frequent use of oil-based cooking methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these findings suggest a need for review and re-examination of the nutritional aspects of plant-based menus currently served in Seoul's elementary school meals.</p>","PeriodicalId":19232,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research and Practice","volume":"19 3","pages":"453-463"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148629/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nutritional quality evaluation of plant-based elementary school meals in Seoul.\",\"authors\":\"So-Young Kim, Meeyoung Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the nutritional quality of plant-based school meals by comparing plant-based and regular menus in Seoul's elementary schools.</p><p><strong>Materials/methods: </strong>Nutrient information for plant-based and regular menus (Monday-Friday) was collected from school websites during a designated week in June 2023 when plant-based meals were offered. The analysis included 1,526 menus (321 plant-based, 1,205 regular) from 313 of 608 schools. Average energy and nutrient content were calculated for both menu types, along with the proportion of schools meeting the nutritional standards for school meals provided by the Ministry of Education in South Korea. Statistical analyses included χ<sup>2</sup> tests, Fisher's exact test, and <i>t</i>-tests (α = 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of energy and nutrient content in both menu types revealed that all nutrients, except vitamin C, met or exceeded the nutritional standards for school meals. However, plant-based menus provided significantly lower levels of energy, protein, fat, thiamine, and vitamin C, and higher levels of carbohydrates, calcium, and iron compared to regular menus. While the macronutrient energy distributions of both menu types were within recommended ranges, plant-based menus tended to have higher carbohydrate ratios and lower protein and fat ratios. Furthermore, schools were more likely to serve plant-based menus that fell short of the nutritional standards for several nutrients. Some plant-based menus were identified as nutritionally unbalanced, revealing fundamental shortcomings in menu design-particularly an overreliance on carbohydrate- and fat-rich foods as staples, side dishes, and desserts, as well as frequent use of oil-based cooking methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, these findings suggest a need for review and re-examination of the nutritional aspects of plant-based menus currently served in Seoul's elementary school meals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"453-463\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148629/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.453\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/29 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.453","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在通过比较首尔小学的植物性和常规菜单来评估植物性学校餐的营养质量。材料/方法:在2023年6月提供植物性膳食的指定一周内,从学校网站收集植物性和常规菜单(周一至周五)的营养信息。分析包括来自608所学校中的313所学校的1526份菜单(321份植物性菜单,1205份常规菜单)。计算了两种菜单的平均能量和营养含量,以及符合韩国教育部提供的学校供餐营养标准的学校比例。统计学分析采用χ2检验、Fisher确切检验和t检验(α = 0.05)。结果:对两种菜单类型的能量和营养成分的分析显示,除维生素C外,所有营养素均达到或超过学校膳食的营养标准。然而,与常规菜单相比,植物性菜单提供的能量、蛋白质、脂肪、硫胺素和维生素C的含量明显较低,而碳水化合物、钙和铁的含量较高。虽然两种菜单类型的宏量营养素能量分布都在推荐范围内,但植物性菜单往往具有较高的碳水化合物比例和较低的蛋白质和脂肪比例。此外,学校更有可能提供植物性菜单,这些菜单中有几种营养素达不到营养标准。一些以植物为基础的菜单被认为营养不均衡,这揭示了菜单设计的根本缺陷——特别是过度依赖富含碳水化合物和脂肪的食物作为主食、配菜和甜点,以及频繁使用以油为基础的烹饪方法。结论:总的来说,这些发现表明有必要对目前首尔小学膳食中植物性菜单的营养方面进行审查和重新检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nutritional quality evaluation of plant-based elementary school meals in Seoul.

Background/objectives: This study aimed to assess the nutritional quality of plant-based school meals by comparing plant-based and regular menus in Seoul's elementary schools.

Materials/methods: Nutrient information for plant-based and regular menus (Monday-Friday) was collected from school websites during a designated week in June 2023 when plant-based meals were offered. The analysis included 1,526 menus (321 plant-based, 1,205 regular) from 313 of 608 schools. Average energy and nutrient content were calculated for both menu types, along with the proportion of schools meeting the nutritional standards for school meals provided by the Ministry of Education in South Korea. Statistical analyses included χ2 tests, Fisher's exact test, and t-tests (α = 0.05).

Results: Analysis of energy and nutrient content in both menu types revealed that all nutrients, except vitamin C, met or exceeded the nutritional standards for school meals. However, plant-based menus provided significantly lower levels of energy, protein, fat, thiamine, and vitamin C, and higher levels of carbohydrates, calcium, and iron compared to regular menus. While the macronutrient energy distributions of both menu types were within recommended ranges, plant-based menus tended to have higher carbohydrate ratios and lower protein and fat ratios. Furthermore, schools were more likely to serve plant-based menus that fell short of the nutritional standards for several nutrients. Some plant-based menus were identified as nutritionally unbalanced, revealing fundamental shortcomings in menu design-particularly an overreliance on carbohydrate- and fat-rich foods as staples, side dishes, and desserts, as well as frequent use of oil-based cooking methods.

Conclusion: Overall, these findings suggest a need for review and re-examination of the nutritional aspects of plant-based menus currently served in Seoul's elementary school meals.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research and Practice
Nutrition Research and Practice NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research and Practice (NRP) is an official journal, jointly published by the Korean Nutrition Society and the Korean Society of Community Nutrition since 2007. The journal had been published quarterly at the initial stage and has been published bimonthly since 2010. NRP aims to stimulate research and practice across diverse areas of human nutrition. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts on nutrition biochemistry and metabolism, community nutrition, nutrition and disease management, nutritional epidemiology, nutrition education, foodservice management in the following categories: Original Research Articles, Notes, Communications, and Reviews. Reviews will be received by the invitation of the editors only. Statements made and opinions expressed in the manuscripts published in this Journal represent the views of authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信