首尔消费者食品安全知识、态度和实践的年龄差异。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Nutrition Research and Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-23 DOI:10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.440
Na-Young Yi, Jung-Hwa Choi
{"title":"首尔消费者食品安全知识、态度和实践的年龄差异。","authors":"Na-Young Yi, Jung-Hwa Choi","doi":"10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study investigated food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers of different age groups in Seoul. These findings provide foundational data for the development of age specific food safety education programs.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>A total of 447 participants aged 20-60 yrs completed an online survey assessing demographics and food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) across categories such as food poisoning, handwashing, food purchase, storage, handling, and consumption. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0, with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple comparisons for post-hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of knowledge, handwashing scored the highest (0.93), whereas egg storage scored the lowest (0.50). Adults in their 40-60s demonstrated greater knowledge of food freezing (<i>P</i> < 0.01), whereas those in their 20s had the lowest awareness of mold-related risks (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Attitude scores were the highest for food storage (4.14) and lowest for food poisoning (3.60). Adults in their 50s and 60s scored higher on food poisoning attitudes, while those in their 20s and 40s scored lower (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Among attitude items, checking for mold before consuming stored food received the highest score (4.15), whereas staying informed about food poisoning received the lowest score (3.38). Practice scores were highest for food purchases (4.13) and lowest for food poisoning (3.51). Older adults scored significantly higher on food poisoning prevention (<i>P</i> < 0.01), purchase (<i>P</i> < 0.05), handling (<i>P</i> < 0.01), and consumption (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Among practice items, adults in their 60s scored the highest for checking expiration dates (4.46), while those in their 20s scored the lowest (4.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights age-related differences in food safety KAP, emphasizing the need for targeted education. Developing age-specific programs can improve food safety behaviors and adherence to hygiene practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":19232,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Research and Practice","volume":"19 3","pages":"440-452"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148631/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age differences in food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers in Seoul.\",\"authors\":\"Na-Young Yi, Jung-Hwa Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.440\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>This study investigated food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers of different age groups in Seoul. These findings provide foundational data for the development of age specific food safety education programs.</p><p><strong>Subjects/methods: </strong>A total of 447 participants aged 20-60 yrs completed an online survey assessing demographics and food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) across categories such as food poisoning, handwashing, food purchase, storage, handling, and consumption. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0, with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple comparisons for post-hoc analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In terms of knowledge, handwashing scored the highest (0.93), whereas egg storage scored the lowest (0.50). Adults in their 40-60s demonstrated greater knowledge of food freezing (<i>P</i> < 0.01), whereas those in their 20s had the lowest awareness of mold-related risks (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Attitude scores were the highest for food storage (4.14) and lowest for food poisoning (3.60). Adults in their 50s and 60s scored higher on food poisoning attitudes, while those in their 20s and 40s scored lower (<i>P</i> < 0.001). Among attitude items, checking for mold before consuming stored food received the highest score (4.15), whereas staying informed about food poisoning received the lowest score (3.38). Practice scores were highest for food purchases (4.13) and lowest for food poisoning (3.51). Older adults scored significantly higher on food poisoning prevention (<i>P</i> < 0.01), purchase (<i>P</i> < 0.05), handling (<i>P</i> < 0.01), and consumption (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Among practice items, adults in their 60s scored the highest for checking expiration dates (4.46), while those in their 20s scored the lowest (4.26).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights age-related differences in food safety KAP, emphasizing the need for targeted education. Developing age-specific programs can improve food safety behaviors and adherence to hygiene practices.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nutrition Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"19 3\",\"pages\":\"440-452\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12148631/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nutrition Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.440\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4162/nrp.2025.19.3.440","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:本研究调查了首尔不同年龄组消费者的食品安全知识、态度和实践。这些发现为制定针对特定年龄的食品安全教育计划提供了基础数据。对象/方法:共有447名年龄在20-60岁之间的参与者完成了一项在线调查,评估人口统计数据和食品安全知识、态度和实践(KAP),涉及食物中毒、洗手、食品购买、储存、处理和消费等类别。数据分析采用SPSS 24.0,采用单因素方差分析,事后分析采用Duncan多重比较。结果:在知识方面,洗手得分最高(0.93),鸡蛋储存得分最低(0.50)。40 ~ 60岁的成年人对食品冷冻的了解程度最高(P < 0.01),而20多岁的成年人对霉菌相关风险的了解程度最低(P < 0.05)。态度得分最高的是食物储存(4.14分),最低的是食物中毒(3.60分)。50岁和60岁的成年人对食物中毒的态度得分较高,而20岁和40岁的成年人得分较低(P < 0.001)。在态度项目中,食用储存食品前检查是否有霉菌得分最高(4.15分),而了解食物中毒情况得分最低(3.38分)。购买食物的实践得分最高(4.13分),食物中毒的实践得分最低(3.51分)。老年人在预防食物中毒(P < 0.01)、购买食物中毒(P < 0.05)、处理食物中毒(P < 0.01)和食用食物中毒(P < 0.01)方面得分较高。在练习项目中,60多岁的成年人在检查保质期方面得分最高(4.46分),20多岁的成年人得分最低(4.26分)。结论:本研究突出了食品安全KAP的年龄相关性差异,强调了有针对性教育的必要性。制定针对年龄的计划可以改善食品安全行为和对卫生习惯的遵守。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Age differences in food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers in Seoul.

Age differences in food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers in Seoul.

Age differences in food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers in Seoul.

Age differences in food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers in Seoul.

Background/objectives: This study investigated food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices among consumers of different age groups in Seoul. These findings provide foundational data for the development of age specific food safety education programs.

Subjects/methods: A total of 447 participants aged 20-60 yrs completed an online survey assessing demographics and food safety knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) across categories such as food poisoning, handwashing, food purchase, storage, handling, and consumption. Data were analyzed using SPSS 24.0, with one-way analysis of variance and Duncan's multiple comparisons for post-hoc analysis.

Results: In terms of knowledge, handwashing scored the highest (0.93), whereas egg storage scored the lowest (0.50). Adults in their 40-60s demonstrated greater knowledge of food freezing (P < 0.01), whereas those in their 20s had the lowest awareness of mold-related risks (P < 0.05). Attitude scores were the highest for food storage (4.14) and lowest for food poisoning (3.60). Adults in their 50s and 60s scored higher on food poisoning attitudes, while those in their 20s and 40s scored lower (P < 0.001). Among attitude items, checking for mold before consuming stored food received the highest score (4.15), whereas staying informed about food poisoning received the lowest score (3.38). Practice scores were highest for food purchases (4.13) and lowest for food poisoning (3.51). Older adults scored significantly higher on food poisoning prevention (P < 0.01), purchase (P < 0.05), handling (P < 0.01), and consumption (P < 0.01). Among practice items, adults in their 60s scored the highest for checking expiration dates (4.46), while those in their 20s scored the lowest (4.26).

Conclusion: This study highlights age-related differences in food safety KAP, emphasizing the need for targeted education. Developing age-specific programs can improve food safety behaviors and adherence to hygiene practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition Research and Practice
Nutrition Research and Practice NUTRITION & DIETETICS-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition Research and Practice (NRP) is an official journal, jointly published by the Korean Nutrition Society and the Korean Society of Community Nutrition since 2007. The journal had been published quarterly at the initial stage and has been published bimonthly since 2010. NRP aims to stimulate research and practice across diverse areas of human nutrition. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed original manuscripts on nutrition biochemistry and metabolism, community nutrition, nutrition and disease management, nutritional epidemiology, nutrition education, foodservice management in the following categories: Original Research Articles, Notes, Communications, and Reviews. Reviews will be received by the invitation of the editors only. Statements made and opinions expressed in the manuscripts published in this Journal represent the views of authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Societies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信