剖析用于治疗抑郁症的单胺类药物的前神经原性作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 5.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Journal of Psychopharmacology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-10 DOI:10.1177/02698811251337382
Juliana A Bolzan, Tamires Martins, Karolina Domingues, Alexandre Surget, Catherine Belzung, Cilene Lino de Oliveira
{"title":"剖析用于治疗抑郁症的单胺类药物的前神经原性作用:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Juliana A Bolzan, Tamires Martins, Karolina Domingues, Alexandre Surget, Catherine Belzung, Cilene Lino de Oliveira","doi":"10.1177/02698811251337382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neurogenic theory of depression proposes that chronic medications modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission may ameliorate symptoms of mood disorders by correcting stressor-induced disruptions in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. However, some controversial findings challenge this assertion. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all pertinent studies, corrected by publication bias, estimated a small, significant, and consistent pro-neurogenic effect of monoaminergic treatments in laboratory rodents. Nearly 30% of the literature exhibited low and 70% unclear risk of bias. In both naïve and stressed mice, pro-neurogenic effects occurred irrespective of strain, sex, stress, or behavioral testing experience. In rats, the effects were predominantly inconclusive due to the lower number of studies in this species. The available number of studies was also insufficient to yield definitive evidence for compounds acting as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, venlafaxine), multimodal monoaminergic modulators (imipramine, desipramine), melatonergic compound (agomelatine), or norepinephrine-serotonin disinhibitory (mirtazapine). Subsequent updates of these reviews appear necessary to establish robust evidence regarding these compounds. Evidence was firm in favor of a robust pro-neurogenic effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, in both species, making updates of this review probably redundant.</p>","PeriodicalId":16892,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"513-532"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissecting the pro-neurogenic effects of monoaminergic medications used to treat depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Juliana A Bolzan, Tamires Martins, Karolina Domingues, Alexandre Surget, Catherine Belzung, Cilene Lino de Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02698811251337382\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The neurogenic theory of depression proposes that chronic medications modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission may ameliorate symptoms of mood disorders by correcting stressor-induced disruptions in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. However, some controversial findings challenge this assertion. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all pertinent studies, corrected by publication bias, estimated a small, significant, and consistent pro-neurogenic effect of monoaminergic treatments in laboratory rodents. Nearly 30% of the literature exhibited low and 70% unclear risk of bias. In both naïve and stressed mice, pro-neurogenic effects occurred irrespective of strain, sex, stress, or behavioral testing experience. In rats, the effects were predominantly inconclusive due to the lower number of studies in this species. The available number of studies was also insufficient to yield definitive evidence for compounds acting as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, venlafaxine), multimodal monoaminergic modulators (imipramine, desipramine), melatonergic compound (agomelatine), or norepinephrine-serotonin disinhibitory (mirtazapine). Subsequent updates of these reviews appear necessary to establish robust evidence regarding these compounds. Evidence was firm in favor of a robust pro-neurogenic effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, in both species, making updates of this review probably redundant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16892,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"513-532\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251337382\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02698811251337382","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

抑郁症的神经源性理论提出,调节单胺能神经传递的慢性药物可能通过纠正应激源诱导的成人海马神经发生中断来改善情绪障碍的症状。然而,一些有争议的发现对这一说法提出了质疑。对所有相关研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析,通过发表偏倚校正,估计单胺能治疗在实验室啮齿动物中具有小的、显著的和一致的促神经原性作用。近30%的文献显示低偏倚风险和70%的不明确偏倚风险。在naïve和应激小鼠中,无论应激、性别、应激或行为测试经历如何,都发生了促神经原性效应。在大鼠中,由于对该物种的研究数量较少,这种影响主要是不确定的。现有的研究数量也不足以提供明确的证据,证明化合物作为选择性5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、氟伏沙明)、5 -羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(去文拉法辛、度洛西汀、文拉法辛)、多模态单胺能调节剂(丙咪嗪、去西帕明)、褪黑激素能化合物(阿戈美拉汀)或去甲肾上腺素- 5 -羟色胺去抑制剂(米氮平)的作用。这些评论的后续更新似乎有必要建立关于这些化合物的有力证据。有确凿的证据表明选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂氟西汀在两种物种中都具有强大的促神经原性作用,因此本综述的更新可能是多余的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissecting the pro-neurogenic effects of monoaminergic medications used to treat depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

The neurogenic theory of depression proposes that chronic medications modulating monoaminergic neurotransmission may ameliorate symptoms of mood disorders by correcting stressor-induced disruptions in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. However, some controversial findings challenge this assertion. A systematic review and meta-analysis of all pertinent studies, corrected by publication bias, estimated a small, significant, and consistent pro-neurogenic effect of monoaminergic treatments in laboratory rodents. Nearly 30% of the literature exhibited low and 70% unclear risk of bias. In both naïve and stressed mice, pro-neurogenic effects occurred irrespective of strain, sex, stress, or behavioral testing experience. In rats, the effects were predominantly inconclusive due to the lower number of studies in this species. The available number of studies was also insufficient to yield definitive evidence for compounds acting as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (desvenlafaxine, duloxetine, venlafaxine), multimodal monoaminergic modulators (imipramine, desipramine), melatonergic compound (agomelatine), or norepinephrine-serotonin disinhibitory (mirtazapine). Subsequent updates of these reviews appear necessary to establish robust evidence regarding these compounds. Evidence was firm in favor of a robust pro-neurogenic effect of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor fluoxetine, in both species, making updates of this review probably redundant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Psychopharmacology
Journal of Psychopharmacology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
4.90%
发文量
126
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychopharmacology is a fully peer-reviewed, international journal that publishes original research and review articles on preclinical and clinical aspects of psychopharmacology. The journal provides an essential forum for researchers and practicing clinicians on the effects of drugs on animal and human behavior, and the mechanisms underlying these effects. The Journal of Psychopharmacology is truly international in scope and readership.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信