活检证实的PACNS:来自大型多中心脑血管炎患者队列的结果。

IF 8.7 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Milani Deb-Chatterji, Parnia Aghel, Hans Pinnschmidt, Christina Krüger, Juliane Herm, Julia Layer, Hebun Erdur, Felix J Bode, Christian H Nolte, Tim Magnus
{"title":"活检证实的PACNS:来自大型多中心脑血管炎患者队列的结果。","authors":"Milani Deb-Chatterji, Parnia Aghel, Hans Pinnschmidt, Christina Krüger, Juliane Herm, Julia Layer, Hebun Erdur, Felix J Bode, Christian H Nolte, Tim Magnus","doi":"10.1136/jnnp-2025-335764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports of primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) are mainly restricted to clinically suspected cases, but biopsy-proven ones are rare. Here, we present results from a large multicentre cohort of patients with biopsy-proven PACNS (BP-PACNS). In particular, we provide insights into characteristics and treatment responses of PACNS subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BP-PACNS patients treated between 1999 and 2021 were analysed. The outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Between-group comparisons were performed by Kruskal-Wallis, χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 57 patients were analysed (52% male). Of these, n=37 (65%) had a lymphocytic (L-PACNS), n=9 (16%) an amyloid-beta-related angiitis (ABRA), n=8 (14%) a granulomatous (G-PACNS) and n=3 (5%) a necrotising (N-PACNS) PACNS subtype. At the time of diagnosis, age differed significantly between groups (median age (years) L-PACNS 47, ABRA 64.5, G-PACNS 37, N-PACNS 65; p=0.008). The clinical course was mostly monophasic in L-PACNS and ABRA (65% and 75%, respectively), while relapsing-remitting in G-PACNS (63%). Median mRS at last follow up was 2 (IQR 1.25-4) in the study group. Worst outcome (median mRS 4) and highest mortality (25%) were seen in G-PACNS. Good induction treatment response was achieved in 77% of all BP-PACNS patients but was low in those with G-PACNS (29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, multicentre series of BP-PACNS patients, G-PACNS had a worse functional outcome, a predominant relapsing-remitting disease and a poorer response to the induction therapy. An optimal first-line treatment regimen for G-PACNS patients should be further examined and established in larger studies to improve the outcome of G-PACNS patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":16418,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Biopsy-proven PACNS: results from the large, multicentre cohort of cerebral vasculitis patients.\",\"authors\":\"Milani Deb-Chatterji, Parnia Aghel, Hans Pinnschmidt, Christina Krüger, Juliane Herm, Julia Layer, Hebun Erdur, Felix J Bode, Christian H Nolte, Tim Magnus\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/jnnp-2025-335764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reports of primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) are mainly restricted to clinically suspected cases, but biopsy-proven ones are rare. Here, we present results from a large multicentre cohort of patients with biopsy-proven PACNS (BP-PACNS). In particular, we provide insights into characteristics and treatment responses of PACNS subtypes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>BP-PACNS patients treated between 1999 and 2021 were analysed. The outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Between-group comparisons were performed by Kruskal-Wallis, χ<sup>2</sup> or Fisher's exact tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 57 patients were analysed (52% male). Of these, n=37 (65%) had a lymphocytic (L-PACNS), n=9 (16%) an amyloid-beta-related angiitis (ABRA), n=8 (14%) a granulomatous (G-PACNS) and n=3 (5%) a necrotising (N-PACNS) PACNS subtype. At the time of diagnosis, age differed significantly between groups (median age (years) L-PACNS 47, ABRA 64.5, G-PACNS 37, N-PACNS 65; p=0.008). The clinical course was mostly monophasic in L-PACNS and ABRA (65% and 75%, respectively), while relapsing-remitting in G-PACNS (63%). Median mRS at last follow up was 2 (IQR 1.25-4) in the study group. Worst outcome (median mRS 4) and highest mortality (25%) were seen in G-PACNS. Good induction treatment response was achieved in 77% of all BP-PACNS patients but was low in those with G-PACNS (29%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this large, multicentre series of BP-PACNS patients, G-PACNS had a worse functional outcome, a predominant relapsing-remitting disease and a poorer response to the induction therapy. An optimal first-line treatment regimen for G-PACNS patients should be further examined and established in larger studies to improve the outcome of G-PACNS patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16418,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-335764\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2025-335764","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:原发性中枢神经系统脉管炎(PACNS)的报道主要局限于临床疑似病例,但活检证实的病例很少。在这里,我们报告了来自活检证实的PACNS (BP-PACNS)患者的大型多中心队列研究结果。特别是,我们提供了对PACNS亚型的特征和治疗反应的见解。方法:对1999 ~ 2021年收治的BP-PACNS患者进行分析。采用改进的Rankin量表(mRS)评估结果。组间比较采用Kruskal-Wallis、χ2或Fisher精确检验。结果:共分析57例患者,其中男性52%。其中,n=37(65%)为淋巴细胞型(L-PACNS), n=9(16%)为淀粉样β相关血管炎(ABRA), n=8(14%)为肉芽肿型(G-PACNS), n=3(5%)为坏死性(n -PACNS) PACNS亚型。诊断时,组间年龄差异显著(中位年龄(岁):L-PACNS 47岁,ABRA 64.5岁,G-PACNS 37岁,N-PACNS 65岁;p = 0.008)。L-PACNS和ABRA的临床病程主要为单相(分别为65%和75%),而G-PACNS的复发缓解(63%)。研究组最后随访中位mRS为2 (IQR 1.25-4)。G-PACNS患者预后最差(平均mRS为4),死亡率最高(25%)。77%的BP-PACNS患者获得了良好的诱导治疗反应,但G-PACNS患者的诱导治疗反应较低(29%)。结论:在这个大型、多中心的BP-PACNS患者系列中,G-PACNS具有较差的功能结局,主要是复发缓解型疾病,对诱导治疗的反应较差。为了改善G-PACNS患者的预后,G-PACNS患者的最佳一线治疗方案需要在更大规模的研究中进一步研究和建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Biopsy-proven PACNS: results from the large, multicentre cohort of cerebral vasculitis patients.

Background: Reports of primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS) are mainly restricted to clinically suspected cases, but biopsy-proven ones are rare. Here, we present results from a large multicentre cohort of patients with biopsy-proven PACNS (BP-PACNS). In particular, we provide insights into characteristics and treatment responses of PACNS subtypes.

Methods: BP-PACNS patients treated between 1999 and 2021 were analysed. The outcome was assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Between-group comparisons were performed by Kruskal-Wallis, χ2 or Fisher's exact tests.

Results: In total, 57 patients were analysed (52% male). Of these, n=37 (65%) had a lymphocytic (L-PACNS), n=9 (16%) an amyloid-beta-related angiitis (ABRA), n=8 (14%) a granulomatous (G-PACNS) and n=3 (5%) a necrotising (N-PACNS) PACNS subtype. At the time of diagnosis, age differed significantly between groups (median age (years) L-PACNS 47, ABRA 64.5, G-PACNS 37, N-PACNS 65; p=0.008). The clinical course was mostly monophasic in L-PACNS and ABRA (65% and 75%, respectively), while relapsing-remitting in G-PACNS (63%). Median mRS at last follow up was 2 (IQR 1.25-4) in the study group. Worst outcome (median mRS 4) and highest mortality (25%) were seen in G-PACNS. Good induction treatment response was achieved in 77% of all BP-PACNS patients but was low in those with G-PACNS (29%).

Conclusions: In this large, multicentre series of BP-PACNS patients, G-PACNS had a worse functional outcome, a predominant relapsing-remitting disease and a poorer response to the induction therapy. An optimal first-line treatment regimen for G-PACNS patients should be further examined and established in larger studies to improve the outcome of G-PACNS patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.80%
发文量
888
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry (JNNP) aspires to publish groundbreaking and cutting-edge research worldwide. Covering the entire spectrum of neurological sciences, the journal focuses on common disorders like stroke, multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease, epilepsy, peripheral neuropathy, subarachnoid haemorrhage, and neuropsychiatry, while also addressing complex challenges such as ALS. With early online publication, regular podcasts, and an extensive archive collection boasting the longest half-life in clinical neuroscience journals, JNNP aims to be a trailblazer in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信