老年综合评估干预对阿尔茨海默病患者血清S100β水平及临床结局的影响

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Da-Wei Wang, Xue-Ting Qin, Gang Wang, Juan Liu, Yu-Ping Xu, Yuan Tian, Bin Liu
{"title":"老年综合评估干预对阿尔茨海默病患者血清S100β水平及临床结局的影响","authors":"Da-Wei Wang, Xue-Ting Qin, Gang Wang, Juan Liu, Yu-Ping Xu, Yuan Tian, Bin Liu","doi":"10.1177/13872877251344544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impairs cognitive function, emotional health, and daily living activities. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary approach designed to optimize health outcomes in older adults, but its effectiveness in managing AD remains to be fully elucidated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of CGA intervention on serum S100β levels and clinical outcomes in patients with AD.MethodsIn this prospective study, 120 patients diagnosed with AD were randomly assigned to either a Control group or an Intervention group. The Control group received standard treatment and routine care, while the Intervention group received individualized care plans based on CGA in addition to standard management. Primary outcomes included serum S100β levels, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores, Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores, assessed at baseline and during follow-up.ResultsSerum S100β levels remained stable in the Control group but significantly decreased in the Intervention group at 6 months. ADLs and IADLs scores were consistently higher in the Intervention group. Although ADAS-Cog and NPI-Q scores improved in both groups, the Intervention group demonstrated significantly lower NPI-Q scores at 6 months.ConclusionsCGA intervention effectively enhances cognitive function, emotional well-being, mobility, and social interaction in patients with AD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14929,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":" ","pages":"686-694"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on serum S100β levels and clinical outcomes in patients with Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Da-Wei Wang, Xue-Ting Qin, Gang Wang, Juan Liu, Yu-Ping Xu, Yuan Tian, Bin Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13872877251344544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impairs cognitive function, emotional health, and daily living activities. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary approach designed to optimize health outcomes in older adults, but its effectiveness in managing AD remains to be fully elucidated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of CGA intervention on serum S100β levels and clinical outcomes in patients with AD.MethodsIn this prospective study, 120 patients diagnosed with AD were randomly assigned to either a Control group or an Intervention group. The Control group received standard treatment and routine care, while the Intervention group received individualized care plans based on CGA in addition to standard management. Primary outcomes included serum S100β levels, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores, Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores, assessed at baseline and during follow-up.ResultsSerum S100β levels remained stable in the Control group but significantly decreased in the Intervention group at 6 months. ADLs and IADLs scores were consistently higher in the Intervention group. Although ADAS-Cog and NPI-Q scores improved in both groups, the Intervention group demonstrated significantly lower NPI-Q scores at 6 months.ConclusionsCGA intervention effectively enhances cognitive function, emotional well-being, mobility, and social interaction in patients with AD.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"686-694\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251344544\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13872877251344544","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

阿尔茨海默病(AD)是一种进行性神经退行性疾病,严重损害认知功能、情绪健康和日常生活活动。综合老年评估(CGA)是一种旨在优化老年人健康结果的多学科方法,但其在管理AD方面的有效性仍有待充分阐明。目的评价CGA干预对阿尔茨海默病患者血清S100β水平及临床结局的影响。方法在这项前瞻性研究中,120例诊断为AD的患者被随机分为对照组和干预组。对照组给予标准治疗和常规护理,干预组在标准管理的基础上给予基于CGA的个性化护理计划。主要结局包括血清S100β水平、阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表(ADAS-Cog)、神经精神量表-问卷(NPI-Q)、老年抑郁量表(GDS)评分、迷你营养评估(MNA)评分、日常生活活动(ADLs)、日常生活工具活动(IADLs)和帕金森病问卷(PDQ-39)评分,在基线和随访期间进行评估。结果6个月时,对照组血清S100β水平保持稳定,干预组血清S100β水平明显下降。干预组的ADLs和IADLs评分始终较高。虽然两组的ADAS-Cog和NPI-Q评分均有改善,但干预组在6个月时的NPI-Q评分显著降低。结论scga干预可有效提高AD患者的认知功能、情绪幸福感、活动能力和社交能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on serum S100β levels and clinical outcomes in patients with Alzheimer's disease.

BackgroundAlzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impairs cognitive function, emotional health, and daily living activities. Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) is a multidisciplinary approach designed to optimize health outcomes in older adults, but its effectiveness in managing AD remains to be fully elucidated.ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of CGA intervention on serum S100β levels and clinical outcomes in patients with AD.MethodsIn this prospective study, 120 patients diagnosed with AD were randomly assigned to either a Control group or an Intervention group. The Control group received standard treatment and routine care, while the Intervention group received individualized care plans based on CGA in addition to standard management. Primary outcomes included serum S100β levels, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog), Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q), Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) scores, Mini-Nutritional Assessment (MNA) scores, Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) scores, assessed at baseline and during follow-up.ResultsSerum S100β levels remained stable in the Control group but significantly decreased in the Intervention group at 6 months. ADLs and IADLs scores were consistently higher in the Intervention group. Although ADAS-Cog and NPI-Q scores improved in both groups, the Intervention group demonstrated significantly lower NPI-Q scores at 6 months.ConclusionsCGA intervention effectively enhances cognitive function, emotional well-being, mobility, and social interaction in patients with AD.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
7.50%
发文量
1327
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Alzheimer''s Disease (JAD) is an international multidisciplinary journal to facilitate progress in understanding the etiology, pathogenesis, epidemiology, genetics, behavior, treatment and psychology of Alzheimer''s disease. The journal publishes research reports, reviews, short communications, hypotheses, ethics reviews, book reviews, and letters-to-the-editor. The journal is dedicated to providing an open forum for original research that will expedite our fundamental understanding of Alzheimer''s disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信