日本COVID-19大流行期间影响心理健康的经济恶化和社会因素:基于网络的横断面调查

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kentaro Hori, Yosuke Yamada, Hideyuki Namba, Misaka Kimura, Hiroyuki Fujita, Heiwa Date
{"title":"日本COVID-19大流行期间影响心理健康的经济恶化和社会因素:基于网络的横断面调查","authors":"Kentaro Hori, Yosuke Yamada, Hideyuki Namba, Misaka Kimura, Hiroyuki Fujita, Heiwa Date","doi":"10.2196/65204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The socioeconomic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected individuals' mental health. However, the factors that mitigate or exacerbate the mental health effects of economic deterioration remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper analyzes survey data from the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, a period during which women workers were reported to be economically and psychologically vulnerable. The analysis examined factors that mitigate or amplify the impact of COVID-19-induced economic deterioration on mental health, testing 3 hypotheses based on the conservation of resources theory and the stress buffering model: the negative impact of economic deterioration on mental health is greater for individuals with less social support compared to those with more social support (hypothesis 1); the negative impact of economic deterioration on mental health is greater for individuals experiencing more negative interactions compared to those experiencing fewer (hypothesis 2); and the buffering effect of social support is stronger in women than in men, with women receiving less social support experiencing greater mental health impacts from economic deterioration (hypothesis 3).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was conducted by an internet research company in Japan from June to July 2020. A balanced sample of 250 men and 250 women was recruited from each of the following age groups: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years. The analysis focused on working men and women aged 20-50 years (n=1238). Psychological distress was measured using the K6 scale. Economic deterioration was defined as a decrease in income compared to the prepandemic levels, and scales for social support and negative interactions were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed, using K6≥9 as the dependent variable, with interaction terms for each hypothesis sequentially incorporated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the best-fitting model determined by the Bayesian Information Criterion, a significant association was observed between the interaction of COVID-19-induced economic deterioration and social support with K6 scores (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99). However, in other models, the interaction between economic deterioration and negative interactions (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13) as well as the 3-way interaction involving economic deterioration, social support, and gender (OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.92-1.39) were not significant. The average marginal effect of economic deterioration was statistically significant for social support scores ranging from 4 to 10. The average marginal effect was 0.11 when social support was 4 (95% CI 0.03-1.20; P=.009) and 0.028 when social support was 10 (95% CI 0.00-0.06; P=.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adverse impact of economic deterioration on mental health was more pronounced among individuals with lower levels of social support. These findings support hypothesis 1.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e65204"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic Deterioration and Social Factors Affecting Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.\",\"authors\":\"Kentaro Hori, Yosuke Yamada, Hideyuki Namba, Misaka Kimura, Hiroyuki Fujita, Heiwa Date\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/65204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The socioeconomic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected individuals' mental health. However, the factors that mitigate or exacerbate the mental health effects of economic deterioration remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This paper analyzes survey data from the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, a period during which women workers were reported to be economically and psychologically vulnerable. The analysis examined factors that mitigate or amplify the impact of COVID-19-induced economic deterioration on mental health, testing 3 hypotheses based on the conservation of resources theory and the stress buffering model: the negative impact of economic deterioration on mental health is greater for individuals with less social support compared to those with more social support (hypothesis 1); the negative impact of economic deterioration on mental health is greater for individuals experiencing more negative interactions compared to those experiencing fewer (hypothesis 2); and the buffering effect of social support is stronger in women than in men, with women receiving less social support experiencing greater mental health impacts from economic deterioration (hypothesis 3).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was conducted by an internet research company in Japan from June to July 2020. A balanced sample of 250 men and 250 women was recruited from each of the following age groups: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years. The analysis focused on working men and women aged 20-50 years (n=1238). Psychological distress was measured using the K6 scale. Economic deterioration was defined as a decrease in income compared to the prepandemic levels, and scales for social support and negative interactions were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed, using K6≥9 as the dependent variable, with interaction terms for each hypothesis sequentially incorporated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the best-fitting model determined by the Bayesian Information Criterion, a significant association was observed between the interaction of COVID-19-induced economic deterioration and social support with K6 scores (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99). However, in other models, the interaction between economic deterioration and negative interactions (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13) as well as the 3-way interaction involving economic deterioration, social support, and gender (OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.92-1.39) were not significant. The average marginal effect of economic deterioration was statistically significant for social support scores ranging from 4 to 10. The average marginal effect was 0.11 when social support was 4 (95% CI 0.03-1.20; P=.009) and 0.028 when social support was 10 (95% CI 0.00-0.06; P=.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The adverse impact of economic deterioration on mental health was more pronounced among individuals with lower levels of social support. These findings support hypothesis 1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e65204\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12173149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/65204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/65204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新冠肺炎大流行的社会经济影响严重影响了个体的心理健康。然而,减轻或加剧经济恶化对心理健康影响的因素仍未得到充分探讨。目的:分析日本第二波COVID-19大流行的调查数据,在此期间,女工被报告在经济和心理上处于弱势地位。该分析考察了减轻或放大新冠肺炎引发的经济恶化对心理健康影响的因素,并基于资源保护理论和压力缓冲模型检验了3个假设:与社会支持较多的个体相比,社会支持较少的个体经济恶化对心理健康的负面影响更大(假设1);与经历较少负面互动的个体相比,经历较多负面互动的个体,经济恶化对心理健康的负面影响更大(假设2);社会支持的缓冲作用在女性中比在男性中更强,接受较少社会支持的女性受到经济恶化的心理健康影响更大(假设3)。方法:2020年6 - 7月,由日本某网络研究公司进行网络调查。从20-29岁、30-39岁、40-49岁、50-59岁、60-69岁和70-79岁的年龄组中分别招募了250名男性和250名女性。分析的重点是20-50岁的工作男女(n=1238)。心理困扰采用K6量表进行测量。经济恶化被定义为与大流行前的水平相比收入减少,并包括社会支持和负面互动的量表。采用Logistic回归分析,以K6≥9为因变量,依次纳入各假设的交互项。结果:在贝叶斯信息准则确定的最佳拟合模型中,观察到covid -19引起的经济恶化和社会支持的相互作用与K6评分之间存在显著关联(优势比[OR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99)。然而,在其他模型中,经济恶化与负相互作用之间的相互作用(OR 1.01, 95%CI 0.90-1.13)以及涉及经济恶化、社会支持和性别的三向相互作用(OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.92-1.39)并不显著。经济恶化的平均边际效应对社会支持得分在4到10分之间有统计学意义。当社会支持为4时,平均边际效应为0.11 (95% CI 0.03-1.20;P= 0.009),当社会支持为10时P= 0.028 (95% CI 0.00-0.06;P = .047)。结论:经济恶化对心理健康的负面影响在社会支持水平较低的个体中更为明显。这些发现支持假设1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic Deterioration and Social Factors Affecting Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: Web-Based Cross-Sectional Survey.

Background: The socioeconomic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected individuals' mental health. However, the factors that mitigate or exacerbate the mental health effects of economic deterioration remain underexplored.

Objective: This paper analyzes survey data from the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan, a period during which women workers were reported to be economically and psychologically vulnerable. The analysis examined factors that mitigate or amplify the impact of COVID-19-induced economic deterioration on mental health, testing 3 hypotheses based on the conservation of resources theory and the stress buffering model: the negative impact of economic deterioration on mental health is greater for individuals with less social support compared to those with more social support (hypothesis 1); the negative impact of economic deterioration on mental health is greater for individuals experiencing more negative interactions compared to those experiencing fewer (hypothesis 2); and the buffering effect of social support is stronger in women than in men, with women receiving less social support experiencing greater mental health impacts from economic deterioration (hypothesis 3).

Methods: A web-based survey was conducted by an internet research company in Japan from June to July 2020. A balanced sample of 250 men and 250 women was recruited from each of the following age groups: 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, 60-69, and 70-79 years. The analysis focused on working men and women aged 20-50 years (n=1238). Psychological distress was measured using the K6 scale. Economic deterioration was defined as a decrease in income compared to the prepandemic levels, and scales for social support and negative interactions were included. Logistic regression analysis was performed, using K6≥9 as the dependent variable, with interaction terms for each hypothesis sequentially incorporated.

Results: In the best-fitting model determined by the Bayesian Information Criterion, a significant association was observed between the interaction of COVID-19-induced economic deterioration and social support with K6 scores (odds ratio [OR] 0.90, 95% CI 0.81-0.99). However, in other models, the interaction between economic deterioration and negative interactions (OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90-1.13) as well as the 3-way interaction involving economic deterioration, social support, and gender (OR 1.13, 95%CI 0.92-1.39) were not significant. The average marginal effect of economic deterioration was statistically significant for social support scores ranging from 4 to 10. The average marginal effect was 0.11 when social support was 4 (95% CI 0.03-1.20; P=.009) and 0.028 when social support was 10 (95% CI 0.00-0.06; P=.047).

Conclusions: The adverse impact of economic deterioration on mental health was more pronounced among individuals with lower levels of social support. These findings support hypothesis 1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信