量化北美食用动物的抗菌素耐药性。

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Frontiers in Microbiology Pub Date : 2025-05-27 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmicb.2025.1542472
Mohamed Mediouni, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Vladimir Makarenkov
{"title":"量化北美食用动物的抗菌素耐药性。","authors":"Mohamed Mediouni, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Vladimir Makarenkov","doi":"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1542472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The global misuse of antimicrobial medication has further exacerbated the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), enriching the pool of genetic mechanisms previously adopted by bacteria to evade antimicrobial drugs. AMR can be either intrinsic or acquired. It can be acquired either by selective genetic modification or by horizontal gene transfer that allows microorganisms to incorporate novel genes from other organisms or environments into their genomes. To avoid an eventual antimicrobial mistreatment, the use of antimicrobials in farm animal has been recently reconsidered in many countries. We present a systematic review of the literature discussing the cases of AMR and the related restrictions applied in North American countries (including Canada, Mexico, and the USA). The Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to find plausible information on antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals, covering the time period from 2015 to 2024. A total of 580 articles addressing the issue of antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals in North America met our inclusion criteria. Different AMR rates, depending on the bacterium being observed, the antibiotic class being used, and the farm animal being considered, have been identified. We determined that the highest average AMR rates have been observed for pigs (60.63% on average), the medium for cattle (48.94% on average), and the lowest for poultry (28.43% on average). We also found that Cephalosporines, Penicillins, and Tetracyclines are the antibiotic classes with the highest average AMR rates (65.86%, 61.32%, and 58.82%, respectively), whereas the use of Sulfonamides and Quinolones leads to the lowest average AMR (21.59% and 28.07%, respectively). Moreover, our analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria shows that <i>Streptococcus suis (S. suis)</i> and <i>S. auerus</i> provide the highest average AMR rates (71.81% and 69.48%, respectively), whereas <i>Campylobacter spp</i>. provides the lowest one (29.75%). The highest average AMR percentage, 57.46%, was observed in Mexico, followed by Canada at 45.22%, and the USA at 42.25%, which is most probably due to the presence of various AMR control strategies, such as stewardship programs and AMR surveillance bodies, existing in Canada and the USA. Our review highlights the need for better strategies and regulations to control the spread of AMR in North America.</p>","PeriodicalId":12466,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Microbiology","volume":"16 ","pages":"1542472"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantifying antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals in North America.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Mediouni, Abdoulaye Baniré Diallo, Vladimir Makarenkov\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmicb.2025.1542472\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The global misuse of antimicrobial medication has further exacerbated the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), enriching the pool of genetic mechanisms previously adopted by bacteria to evade antimicrobial drugs. AMR can be either intrinsic or acquired. It can be acquired either by selective genetic modification or by horizontal gene transfer that allows microorganisms to incorporate novel genes from other organisms or environments into their genomes. To avoid an eventual antimicrobial mistreatment, the use of antimicrobials in farm animal has been recently reconsidered in many countries. We present a systematic review of the literature discussing the cases of AMR and the related restrictions applied in North American countries (including Canada, Mexico, and the USA). The Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to find plausible information on antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals, covering the time period from 2015 to 2024. A total of 580 articles addressing the issue of antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals in North America met our inclusion criteria. Different AMR rates, depending on the bacterium being observed, the antibiotic class being used, and the farm animal being considered, have been identified. We determined that the highest average AMR rates have been observed for pigs (60.63% on average), the medium for cattle (48.94% on average), and the lowest for poultry (28.43% on average). We also found that Cephalosporines, Penicillins, and Tetracyclines are the antibiotic classes with the highest average AMR rates (65.86%, 61.32%, and 58.82%, respectively), whereas the use of Sulfonamides and Quinolones leads to the lowest average AMR (21.59% and 28.07%, respectively). Moreover, our analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria shows that <i>Streptococcus suis (S. suis)</i> and <i>S. auerus</i> provide the highest average AMR rates (71.81% and 69.48%, respectively), whereas <i>Campylobacter spp</i>. provides the lowest one (29.75%). The highest average AMR percentage, 57.46%, was observed in Mexico, followed by Canada at 45.22%, and the USA at 42.25%, which is most probably due to the presence of various AMR control strategies, such as stewardship programs and AMR surveillance bodies, existing in Canada and the USA. Our review highlights the need for better strategies and regulations to control the spread of AMR in North America.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"1542472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12149124/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1542472\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2025.1542472","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全球滥用抗微生物药物进一步加剧了抗微生物药物耐药性(AMR)问题,丰富了细菌先前采用的逃避抗微生物药物的遗传机制。抗菌素耐药性可以是内在的,也可以是后天获得的。它可以通过选择性基因修饰或水平基因转移获得,这种转移允许微生物将来自其他生物体或环境的新基因纳入其基因组。为了避免最终的抗菌素滥用,许多国家最近重新考虑了在农场动物中使用抗菌素。我们对北美国家(包括加拿大、墨西哥和美国)的AMR病例和相关限制进行了系统的文献综述。我们检索了谷歌Scholar、PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane数据库,以寻找2015年至2024年期间食品生产动物抗菌药物使用和耐药性的可信信息。共有580篇关于北美食用动物抗生素耐药性问题的文章符合我们的纳入标准。根据观察到的细菌、所使用的抗生素种类和所考虑的农场动物,已经确定了不同的抗菌素耐药性率。我们确定猪的平均AMR率最高(平均为60.63%),牛中等(平均为48.94%),家禽最低(平均为28.43%)。头孢菌素类、青霉素类和四环素类抗生素的平均AMR最高(分别为65.86%、61.32%和58.82%),磺胺类和喹诺酮类抗生素的平均AMR最低(分别为21.59%和28.07%)。此外,我们的耐药菌分析显示,猪链球菌(S. suis)和金黄色葡萄球菌的平均AMR率最高,分别为71.81%和69.48%,弯曲杆菌(Campylobacter spp.)最低,为29.75%。平均AMR百分比最高的是墨西哥,为57.46%,其次是加拿大,为45.22%,美国为42.25%,这很可能是由于加拿大和美国存在各种AMR控制策略,如管理计划和AMR监测机构。我们的审查强调需要更好的战略和法规来控制抗菌素耐药性在北美的传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantifying antimicrobial resistance in food-producing animals in North America.

The global misuse of antimicrobial medication has further exacerbated the problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), enriching the pool of genetic mechanisms previously adopted by bacteria to evade antimicrobial drugs. AMR can be either intrinsic or acquired. It can be acquired either by selective genetic modification or by horizontal gene transfer that allows microorganisms to incorporate novel genes from other organisms or environments into their genomes. To avoid an eventual antimicrobial mistreatment, the use of antimicrobials in farm animal has been recently reconsidered in many countries. We present a systematic review of the literature discussing the cases of AMR and the related restrictions applied in North American countries (including Canada, Mexico, and the USA). The Google Scholar, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched to find plausible information on antimicrobial use and resistance in food-producing animals, covering the time period from 2015 to 2024. A total of 580 articles addressing the issue of antibiotic resistance in food-producing animals in North America met our inclusion criteria. Different AMR rates, depending on the bacterium being observed, the antibiotic class being used, and the farm animal being considered, have been identified. We determined that the highest average AMR rates have been observed for pigs (60.63% on average), the medium for cattle (48.94% on average), and the lowest for poultry (28.43% on average). We also found that Cephalosporines, Penicillins, and Tetracyclines are the antibiotic classes with the highest average AMR rates (65.86%, 61.32%, and 58.82%, respectively), whereas the use of Sulfonamides and Quinolones leads to the lowest average AMR (21.59% and 28.07%, respectively). Moreover, our analysis of antibiotic-resistant bacteria shows that Streptococcus suis (S. suis) and S. auerus provide the highest average AMR rates (71.81% and 69.48%, respectively), whereas Campylobacter spp. provides the lowest one (29.75%). The highest average AMR percentage, 57.46%, was observed in Mexico, followed by Canada at 45.22%, and the USA at 42.25%, which is most probably due to the presence of various AMR control strategies, such as stewardship programs and AMR surveillance bodies, existing in Canada and the USA. Our review highlights the need for better strategies and regulations to control the spread of AMR in North America.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.60%
发文量
4837
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Microbiology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across the entire spectrum of microbiology. Field Chief Editor Martin G. Klotz at Washington State University is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信