长时间等待庇护的心理影响。

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Aleena Shahzad, Cornelius Katona, Naomi Glover
{"title":"长时间等待庇护的心理影响。","authors":"Aleena Shahzad, Cornelius Katona, Naomi Glover","doi":"10.1080/20008066.2025.2506189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and objectives:</b> In the last decade, Europe has witnessed a substantial increase in asylum applications, resulting in a growing backlog of cases. The prolonged wait has been associated with elevated risks of mental disorders, diminished psychological well-being, and reduced quality of life. Existing systematic reviews focus on multiple post-migration factors; however, delay was identified as a key contributor to poor mental health and decreased emotional wellbeing. Our review focuses on this factor and builds on existing literature.<b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis focusing on the impact of extended waiting periods on the mental health of asylum seekers. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE and PsycINFO, resulting in a total of sixteen studies. These studies were qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs, all focusing on the duration of the asylum process and its effects on mental well-being. The overall quality of these studies ranged from adequate to low.<b>Results:</b> Several adverse mental health outcomes associated with prolonged asylum waiting times were identified, including an increased risk of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and worsening of pre-existing mental illnesses. The extended wait exacerbated suicidal ideation due to frustration stemming from an inability to engage in meaningful activities, social isolation, and perceived discrimination from others. The ambiguity surrounding asylum procedures, caseworker reluctance to provide updates or clear timelines, and prolonged family separation also negatively impacted asylum seekers' mental health.<b>Conclusion:</b> These findings highlight the importance of reforming current asylum procedures to create a more humane and efficient process that protects the mental health of asylum seekers.</p>","PeriodicalId":12055,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","volume":"16 1","pages":"2506189"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152982/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The psychological impact of spending a prolonged time awaiting asylum.\",\"authors\":\"Aleena Shahzad, Cornelius Katona, Naomi Glover\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/20008066.2025.2506189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background and objectives:</b> In the last decade, Europe has witnessed a substantial increase in asylum applications, resulting in a growing backlog of cases. The prolonged wait has been associated with elevated risks of mental disorders, diminished psychological well-being, and reduced quality of life. Existing systematic reviews focus on multiple post-migration factors; however, delay was identified as a key contributor to poor mental health and decreased emotional wellbeing. Our review focuses on this factor and builds on existing literature.<b>Methods:</b> We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis focusing on the impact of extended waiting periods on the mental health of asylum seekers. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE and PsycINFO, resulting in a total of sixteen studies. These studies were qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs, all focusing on the duration of the asylum process and its effects on mental well-being. The overall quality of these studies ranged from adequate to low.<b>Results:</b> Several adverse mental health outcomes associated with prolonged asylum waiting times were identified, including an increased risk of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and worsening of pre-existing mental illnesses. The extended wait exacerbated suicidal ideation due to frustration stemming from an inability to engage in meaningful activities, social isolation, and perceived discrimination from others. The ambiguity surrounding asylum procedures, caseworker reluctance to provide updates or clear timelines, and prolonged family separation also negatively impacted asylum seekers' mental health.<b>Conclusion:</b> These findings highlight the importance of reforming current asylum procedures to create a more humane and efficient process that protects the mental health of asylum seekers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12055,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"2506189\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12152982/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Psychotraumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2506189\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/10 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychotraumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2025.2506189","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目标:在过去十年中,欧洲的庇护申请大幅增加,导致案件积压越来越多。长时间的等待与精神障碍风险增加、心理健康状况下降和生活质量下降有关。现有的系统审查侧重于多种迁移后因素;然而,延迟被认为是导致心理健康状况不佳和情绪幸福感下降的关键因素。我们的综述集中在这一因素上,并以现有文献为基础。方法:我们对延长等待期对寻求庇护者心理健康的影响进行了系统回顾和叙述综合。在MEDLINE和PsycINFO上进行了搜索,总共有16项研究。这些研究采用定性、定量和混合方法设计,都关注庇护过程的持续时间及其对心理健康的影响。这些研究的总体质量从适当到低不等。结果:确定了与庇护等待时间延长相关的几种不良心理健康结果,包括抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍的风险增加,以及先前存在的精神疾病的恶化。由于无法参与有意义的活动、社会孤立和感觉到受到他人歧视而产生的挫败感,延长的等待加剧了自杀意念。庇护程序含糊不清,案件工作者不愿提供最新情况或明确的时间表,以及长期的家庭分离也对寻求庇护者的心理健康产生了负面影响。结论:这些调查结果突出了改革现行庇护程序的重要性,以建立一个更加人道和有效的程序,保护寻求庇护者的心理健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The psychological impact of spending a prolonged time awaiting asylum.

The psychological impact of spending a prolonged time awaiting asylum.

The psychological impact of spending a prolonged time awaiting asylum.

Background and objectives: In the last decade, Europe has witnessed a substantial increase in asylum applications, resulting in a growing backlog of cases. The prolonged wait has been associated with elevated risks of mental disorders, diminished psychological well-being, and reduced quality of life. Existing systematic reviews focus on multiple post-migration factors; however, delay was identified as a key contributor to poor mental health and decreased emotional wellbeing. Our review focuses on this factor and builds on existing literature.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and narrative synthesis focusing on the impact of extended waiting periods on the mental health of asylum seekers. Searches were conducted on MEDLINE and PsycINFO, resulting in a total of sixteen studies. These studies were qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods designs, all focusing on the duration of the asylum process and its effects on mental well-being. The overall quality of these studies ranged from adequate to low.Results: Several adverse mental health outcomes associated with prolonged asylum waiting times were identified, including an increased risk of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder, and worsening of pre-existing mental illnesses. The extended wait exacerbated suicidal ideation due to frustration stemming from an inability to engage in meaningful activities, social isolation, and perceived discrimination from others. The ambiguity surrounding asylum procedures, caseworker reluctance to provide updates or clear timelines, and prolonged family separation also negatively impacted asylum seekers' mental health.Conclusion: These findings highlight the importance of reforming current asylum procedures to create a more humane and efficient process that protects the mental health of asylum seekers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
12.00%
发文量
153
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) is a peer-reviewed open access interdisciplinary journal owned by the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS). The European Journal of Psychotraumatology (EJPT) aims to engage scholars, clinicians and researchers in the vital issues of how to understand, prevent and treat the consequences of stress and trauma, including but not limited to, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depressive disorders, substance abuse, burnout, and neurobiological or physical consequences, using the latest research or clinical experience in these areas. The journal shares ESTSS’ mission to advance and disseminate scientific knowledge about traumatic stress. Papers may address individual events, repeated or chronic (complex) trauma, large scale disasters, or violence. Being open access, the European Journal of Psychotraumatology is also evidence of ESTSS’ stand on free accessibility of research publications to a wider community via the web. The European Journal of Psychotraumatology seeks to attract contributions from academics and practitioners from diverse professional backgrounds, including, but not restricted to, those in mental health, social sciences, and health and welfare services. Contributions from outside Europe are welcome. The journal welcomes original basic and clinical research articles that consolidate and expand the theoretical and professional basis of the field of traumatic stress; Review articles including meta-analyses; short communications presenting new ideas or early-stage promising research; study protocols that describe proposed or ongoing research; case reports examining a single individual or event in a real‑life context; clinical practice papers sharing experience from the clinic; letters to the Editor debating articles already published in the Journal; inaugural Lectures; conference abstracts and book reviews. Both quantitative and qualitative research is welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信