Samrat Sheoran, Antonis Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Josh Darrall-Jones, Dan Weaving
{"title":"内部训练暴露:使用心率变异性的个体化方法的开发和构建验证。","authors":"Samrat Sheoran, Antonis Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Josh Darrall-Jones, Dan Weaving","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to develop and validate an individualised internal training exposure method by deriving weighting factors for each heart rate (HR) from detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) during a graded exercise test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven participants (17 females; 32.72 ± 9.26 years; maximal oxygen uptake, <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> = 48.32 ± 7.95 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) completed a step- and a ramp incremental test to measure blood lactate (BLa), DFA-α1, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) variables, i.e. speed at lactate, ventilatory thresholds (LTs/VTs), and <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>. Exponential fitting of the fractional elevation of HR (ΔHR) with BLa (individualised training impulse; iTRIMP) or DFA-α1 (αTRIMP) generated individualised coefficients for both methods. The TRIMP weightings were interpolated values of BLa or DFA-α1 derived at each ΔHR through coefficients to represent individualised physiological intensity. Principal component regression evaluated the relationship between combined CRF variables and the TRIMP coefficients or weightings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large inter-individual variation was observed at the same physiological thresholds (ΔHR at LT<sub>1</sub>/VT<sub>1</sub> = 0.51-0.83 and LT<sub>2</sub>/VT<sub>2</sub> = 0.63-0.96), underscoring the need for TRIMP methods to weight ΔHR and account for different exposure at similar intensity. CRF had a moderate relationship with coefficients for iTRIMP and αTRIMP methods (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.52-0.67), but a moderate to strong relationship with their weightings at a fixed ΔHR (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.67-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>αTRIMP is a valid and practically accessible method for quantifying internal training exposure using ECG-based HR monitors, which individualises physiological intensity through DFA-α1-derived weightings among individuals of varied fitness exercising at same percentages of HR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal training exposure: development and construct validation of an individualised method using heart rate variability.\",\"authors\":\"Samrat Sheoran, Antonis Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Josh Darrall-Jones, Dan Weaving\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to develop and validate an individualised internal training exposure method by deriving weighting factors for each heart rate (HR) from detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) during a graded exercise test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven participants (17 females; 32.72 ± 9.26 years; maximal oxygen uptake, <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> = 48.32 ± 7.95 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) completed a step- and a ramp incremental test to measure blood lactate (BLa), DFA-α1, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) variables, i.e. speed at lactate, ventilatory thresholds (LTs/VTs), and <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>. Exponential fitting of the fractional elevation of HR (ΔHR) with BLa (individualised training impulse; iTRIMP) or DFA-α1 (αTRIMP) generated individualised coefficients for both methods. The TRIMP weightings were interpolated values of BLa or DFA-α1 derived at each ΔHR through coefficients to represent individualised physiological intensity. Principal component regression evaluated the relationship between combined CRF variables and the TRIMP coefficients or weightings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large inter-individual variation was observed at the same physiological thresholds (ΔHR at LT<sub>1</sub>/VT<sub>1</sub> = 0.51-0.83 and LT<sub>2</sub>/VT<sub>2</sub> = 0.63-0.96), underscoring the need for TRIMP methods to weight ΔHR and account for different exposure at similar intensity. CRF had a moderate relationship with coefficients for iTRIMP and αTRIMP methods (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.52-0.67), but a moderate to strong relationship with their weightings at a fixed ΔHR (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.67-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>αTRIMP is a valid and practically accessible method for quantifying internal training exposure using ECG-based HR monitors, which individualises physiological intensity through DFA-α1-derived weightings among individuals of varied fitness exercising at same percentages of HR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Internal training exposure: development and construct validation of an individualised method using heart rate variability.
Purpose: The aim was to develop and validate an individualised internal training exposure method by deriving weighting factors for each heart rate (HR) from detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) during a graded exercise test.
Methods: Thirty-seven participants (17 females; 32.72 ± 9.26 years; maximal oxygen uptake, O2max = 48.32 ± 7.95 mL kg-1 min-1) completed a step- and a ramp incremental test to measure blood lactate (BLa), DFA-α1, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) variables, i.e. speed at lactate, ventilatory thresholds (LTs/VTs), and O2max. Exponential fitting of the fractional elevation of HR (ΔHR) with BLa (individualised training impulse; iTRIMP) or DFA-α1 (αTRIMP) generated individualised coefficients for both methods. The TRIMP weightings were interpolated values of BLa or DFA-α1 derived at each ΔHR through coefficients to represent individualised physiological intensity. Principal component regression evaluated the relationship between combined CRF variables and the TRIMP coefficients or weightings.
Results: Large inter-individual variation was observed at the same physiological thresholds (ΔHR at LT1/VT1 = 0.51-0.83 and LT2/VT2 = 0.63-0.96), underscoring the need for TRIMP methods to weight ΔHR and account for different exposure at similar intensity. CRF had a moderate relationship with coefficients for iTRIMP and αTRIMP methods (R2average = 0.52-0.67), but a moderate to strong relationship with their weightings at a fixed ΔHR (R2average = 0.67-0.78).
Conclusion: αTRIMP is a valid and practically accessible method for quantifying internal training exposure using ECG-based HR monitors, which individualises physiological intensity through DFA-α1-derived weightings among individuals of varied fitness exercising at same percentages of HR.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.