内部训练暴露:使用心率变异性的个体化方法的开发和构建验证。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PHYSIOLOGY
Samrat Sheoran, Antonis Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Josh Darrall-Jones, Dan Weaving
{"title":"内部训练暴露:使用心率变异性的个体化方法的开发和构建验证。","authors":"Samrat Sheoran, Antonis Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Josh Darrall-Jones, Dan Weaving","doi":"10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to develop and validate an individualised internal training exposure method by deriving weighting factors for each heart rate (HR) from detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) during a graded exercise test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven participants (17 females; 32.72 ± 9.26 years; maximal oxygen uptake, <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> = 48.32 ± 7.95 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) completed a step- and a ramp incremental test to measure blood lactate (BLa), DFA-α1, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) variables, i.e. speed at lactate, ventilatory thresholds (LTs/VTs), and <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>. Exponential fitting of the fractional elevation of HR (ΔHR) with BLa (individualised training impulse; iTRIMP) or DFA-α1 (αTRIMP) generated individualised coefficients for both methods. The TRIMP weightings were interpolated values of BLa or DFA-α1 derived at each ΔHR through coefficients to represent individualised physiological intensity. Principal component regression evaluated the relationship between combined CRF variables and the TRIMP coefficients or weightings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large inter-individual variation was observed at the same physiological thresholds (ΔHR at LT<sub>1</sub>/VT<sub>1</sub> = 0.51-0.83 and LT<sub>2</sub>/VT<sub>2</sub> = 0.63-0.96), underscoring the need for TRIMP methods to weight ΔHR and account for different exposure at similar intensity. CRF had a moderate relationship with coefficients for iTRIMP and αTRIMP methods (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.52-0.67), but a moderate to strong relationship with their weightings at a fixed ΔHR (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.67-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>αTRIMP is a valid and practically accessible method for quantifying internal training exposure using ECG-based HR monitors, which individualises physiological intensity through DFA-α1-derived weightings among individuals of varied fitness exercising at same percentages of HR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12005,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Internal training exposure: development and construct validation of an individualised method using heart rate variability.\",\"authors\":\"Samrat Sheoran, Antonis Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou, Josh Darrall-Jones, Dan Weaving\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The aim was to develop and validate an individualised internal training exposure method by deriving weighting factors for each heart rate (HR) from detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) during a graded exercise test.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-seven participants (17 females; 32.72 ± 9.26 years; maximal oxygen uptake, <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub> = 48.32 ± 7.95 mL kg<sup>-1</sup> min<sup>-1</sup>) completed a step- and a ramp incremental test to measure blood lactate (BLa), DFA-α1, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) variables, i.e. speed at lactate, ventilatory thresholds (LTs/VTs), and <math><mover><mi>V</mi> <mo>˙</mo></mover> </math> O<sub>2max</sub>. Exponential fitting of the fractional elevation of HR (ΔHR) with BLa (individualised training impulse; iTRIMP) or DFA-α1 (αTRIMP) generated individualised coefficients for both methods. The TRIMP weightings were interpolated values of BLa or DFA-α1 derived at each ΔHR through coefficients to represent individualised physiological intensity. Principal component regression evaluated the relationship between combined CRF variables and the TRIMP coefficients or weightings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Large inter-individual variation was observed at the same physiological thresholds (ΔHR at LT<sub>1</sub>/VT<sub>1</sub> = 0.51-0.83 and LT<sub>2</sub>/VT<sub>2</sub> = 0.63-0.96), underscoring the need for TRIMP methods to weight ΔHR and account for different exposure at similar intensity. CRF had a moderate relationship with coefficients for iTRIMP and αTRIMP methods (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.52-0.67), but a moderate to strong relationship with their weightings at a fixed ΔHR (R<sup>2</sup><sub>average</sub> = 0.67-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>αTRIMP is a valid and practically accessible method for quantifying internal training exposure using ECG-based HR monitors, which individualises physiological intensity through DFA-α1-derived weightings among individuals of varied fitness exercising at same percentages of HR.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Applied Physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Applied Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-025-05841-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过对分级运动试验中心率变异性(DFA-α1)的趋势波动分析,得出每个心率(HR)的加权因子,从而开发并验证一种个性化的内部训练暴露方法。方法:37例受试者(女性17例;32.72±9.26岁;最大摄氧量,V˙O2max = 48.32±7.95 mL kg-1 min-1)完成了阶梯和斜坡增量试验,以测量血乳酸(BLa)、DFA-α1和心肺适能(CRF)变量,即乳酸速度、通气阈值(lt / vt)和V˙O2max。HR分数升高(ΔHR)与BLa(个性化训练冲量)的指数拟合ittrimp)或DFA-α1 (αTRIMP)为两种方法生成个性化系数。TRIMP权重是通过系数内插每个ΔHR处的BLa或DFA-α1的值,以表示个性化的生理强度。主成分回归评估组合CRF变量与TRIMP系数或权重之间的关系。结果:在相同的生理阈值(ΔHR在LT1/VT1 = 0.51-0.83和LT2/VT2 = 0.63-0.96)下观察到很大的个体间差异,强调TRIMP方法需要对ΔHR进行加权,并考虑相似强度下的不同暴露。CRF与ittrim和αTRIMP方法的系数呈中等相关性(r2平均= 0.52 ~ 0.67),但与它们的权重在固定ΔHR下呈中等至强相关性(r2平均= 0.67 ~ 0.78)。结论:αTRIMP是一种有效且实用的方法,可用于量化基于心电图的心率监测仪的内部训练暴露,该方法通过DFA-α1衍生的权重在相同心率百分比下进行不同健身运动的个体之间个性化生理强度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Internal training exposure: development and construct validation of an individualised method using heart rate variability.

Purpose: The aim was to develop and validate an individualised internal training exposure method by deriving weighting factors for each heart rate (HR) from detrended fluctuation analysis of heart rate variability (DFA-α1) during a graded exercise test.

Methods: Thirty-seven participants (17 females; 32.72 ± 9.26 years; maximal oxygen uptake, V ˙ O2max = 48.32 ± 7.95 mL kg-1 min-1) completed a step- and a ramp incremental test to measure blood lactate (BLa), DFA-α1, and cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) variables, i.e. speed at lactate, ventilatory thresholds (LTs/VTs), and V ˙ O2max. Exponential fitting of the fractional elevation of HR (ΔHR) with BLa (individualised training impulse; iTRIMP) or DFA-α1 (αTRIMP) generated individualised coefficients for both methods. The TRIMP weightings were interpolated values of BLa or DFA-α1 derived at each ΔHR through coefficients to represent individualised physiological intensity. Principal component regression evaluated the relationship between combined CRF variables and the TRIMP coefficients or weightings.

Results: Large inter-individual variation was observed at the same physiological thresholds (ΔHR at LT1/VT1 = 0.51-0.83 and LT2/VT2 = 0.63-0.96), underscoring the need for TRIMP methods to weight ΔHR and account for different exposure at similar intensity. CRF had a moderate relationship with coefficients for iTRIMP and αTRIMP methods (R2average = 0.52-0.67), but a moderate to strong relationship with their weightings at a fixed ΔHR (R2average = 0.67-0.78).

Conclusion: αTRIMP is a valid and practically accessible method for quantifying internal training exposure using ECG-based HR monitors, which individualises physiological intensity through DFA-α1-derived weightings among individuals of varied fitness exercising at same percentages of HR.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
227
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Applied Physiology (EJAP) aims to promote mechanistic advances in human integrative and translational physiology. Physiology is viewed broadly, having overlapping context with related disciplines such as biomechanics, biochemistry, endocrinology, ergonomics, immunology, motor control, and nutrition. EJAP welcomes studies dealing with physical exercise, training and performance. Studies addressing physiological mechanisms are preferred over descriptive studies. Papers dealing with animal models or pathophysiological conditions are not excluded from consideration, but must be clearly relevant to human physiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信