3.0 T MRI膝关节快速自旋回波多点Dixon图像评估半月板撕裂的价值。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Sumin Park, Hee Jin Park, Ji Na Kim
{"title":"3.0 T MRI膝关节快速自旋回波多点Dixon图像评估半月板撕裂的价值。","authors":"Sumin Park, Hee Jin Park, Ji Na Kim","doi":"10.1177/02841851251347780","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundIt remains unclear whether a torn meniscus loses significantly more fat content than a normal meniscus and consequently shows a lower signal drop on opposed-phase (OP) images using the multi-point Dixon (mDixon) technique.PurposeTo evaluate meniscal injuries by performing a quantitative analysis of internal fat content using a signal drop.Material and MethodsA total of 99 patients who underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the mDixon technique was included in this retrospective study. We measured the mean signal intensity of the meniscus from the in-phase (IP) and OP mDixon images with sagittal reconstruction. The proportional decrease of signal intensity (signal drop) was calculated. The median value with 25th (Q1) and 75th (Q3) percentiles of signal drop was reported for each meniscus. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the signal drop between meniscal tear and normal groups.ResultsIn the lateral meniscus (LM) and medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) tear groups, the median values of signal drop were significantly lower than in the normal group (<i>P</i> <0.05). Although the MM anterior horn (MMAH) tear group had a lower median signal drop than the normal group, there was no significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.116 and 0.283, readers 1 and 2, respectively).ConclusionThe signal drop in torn menisci was lower than in normal menisci across all tear types, with statistical significance observed in LM and MMPH tears. We believe that these results may be explained by a reduced intracellular lipid content in torn menisci compared to normal menisci.</p>","PeriodicalId":7143,"journal":{"name":"Acta radiologica","volume":" ","pages":"2841851251347780"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Usefulness of the fast spin-echo multi-point Dixon image of the knee joint on 3.0 T MRI for evaluation of meniscal tear.\",\"authors\":\"Sumin Park, Hee Jin Park, Ji Na Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02841851251347780\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>BackgroundIt remains unclear whether a torn meniscus loses significantly more fat content than a normal meniscus and consequently shows a lower signal drop on opposed-phase (OP) images using the multi-point Dixon (mDixon) technique.PurposeTo evaluate meniscal injuries by performing a quantitative analysis of internal fat content using a signal drop.Material and MethodsA total of 99 patients who underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the mDixon technique was included in this retrospective study. We measured the mean signal intensity of the meniscus from the in-phase (IP) and OP mDixon images with sagittal reconstruction. The proportional decrease of signal intensity (signal drop) was calculated. The median value with 25th (Q1) and 75th (Q3) percentiles of signal drop was reported for each meniscus. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the signal drop between meniscal tear and normal groups.ResultsIn the lateral meniscus (LM) and medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) tear groups, the median values of signal drop were significantly lower than in the normal group (<i>P</i> <0.05). Although the MM anterior horn (MMAH) tear group had a lower median signal drop than the normal group, there was no significant difference (<i>P</i> = 0.116 and 0.283, readers 1 and 2, respectively).ConclusionThe signal drop in torn menisci was lower than in normal menisci across all tear types, with statistical significance observed in LM and MMPH tears. We believe that these results may be explained by a reduced intracellular lipid content in torn menisci compared to normal menisci.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2841851251347780\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta radiologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251347780\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta radiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02841851251347780","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前尚不清楚撕裂的半月板是否比正常的半月板损失更多的脂肪含量,从而在多点Dixon (mDixon)技术的对相(OP)图像上显示更低的信号下降。目的利用信号下降法定量分析内部脂肪含量,评估半月板损伤。材料与方法回顾性研究99例膝关节磁共振成像(MRI) mDixon技术患者。我们用矢状面重建的同相(IP)和OP mDixon图像测量了半月板的平均信号强度。计算了信号强度的比例衰减(信号降)。每个半月板的信号下降中位数分别为第25 (Q1)和第75 (Q3)个百分位。采用Mann-Whitney u检验比较半月板撕裂组与正常组的信号下降。结果外侧半月板(LM)和内侧半月板后角(MMPH)撕裂组信号下降中位数显著低于正常组(P值分别为0.116和0.283,阅读者1和2)。结论所有撕裂类型的半月板撕裂后信号下降均低于正常半月板,在LM和MMPH撕裂中差异有统计学意义。我们认为这些结果可能是由于撕裂半月板的细胞内脂质含量比正常半月板低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Usefulness of the fast spin-echo multi-point Dixon image of the knee joint on 3.0 T MRI for evaluation of meniscal tear.

BackgroundIt remains unclear whether a torn meniscus loses significantly more fat content than a normal meniscus and consequently shows a lower signal drop on opposed-phase (OP) images using the multi-point Dixon (mDixon) technique.PurposeTo evaluate meniscal injuries by performing a quantitative analysis of internal fat content using a signal drop.Material and MethodsA total of 99 patients who underwent knee magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with the mDixon technique was included in this retrospective study. We measured the mean signal intensity of the meniscus from the in-phase (IP) and OP mDixon images with sagittal reconstruction. The proportional decrease of signal intensity (signal drop) was calculated. The median value with 25th (Q1) and 75th (Q3) percentiles of signal drop was reported for each meniscus. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used to compare the signal drop between meniscal tear and normal groups.ResultsIn the lateral meniscus (LM) and medial meniscus posterior horn (MMPH) tear groups, the median values of signal drop were significantly lower than in the normal group (P <0.05). Although the MM anterior horn (MMAH) tear group had a lower median signal drop than the normal group, there was no significant difference (P = 0.116 and 0.283, readers 1 and 2, respectively).ConclusionThe signal drop in torn menisci was lower than in normal menisci across all tear types, with statistical significance observed in LM and MMPH tears. We believe that these results may be explained by a reduced intracellular lipid content in torn menisci compared to normal menisci.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta radiologica
Acta radiologica 医学-核医学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Radiologica publishes articles on all aspects of radiology, from clinical radiology to experimental work. It is known for articles based on experimental work and contrast media research, giving priority to scientific original papers. The distinguished international editorial board also invite review articles, short communications and technical and instrumental notes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信