抗核抗体阳性复发性自然流产的治疗及妊娠结局分析

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Ancong Wang, Fengxia Wu, Min Liu, Zhenchun Zhang, Shuxia Li, Qihua Tan
{"title":"抗核抗体阳性复发性自然流产的治疗及妊娠结局分析","authors":"Ancong Wang,&nbsp;Fengxia Wu,&nbsp;Min Liu,&nbsp;Zhenchun Zhang,&nbsp;Shuxia Li,&nbsp;Qihua Tan","doi":"10.1002/iid3.70216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The etiology of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) has not been clearly defined. The role of autoantibodies in RSA has particularly attracted much attention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>A retrospective analysis was performed to explore the combinatory efficacy of five drugs (aspirin enteric-coated tablets, hydroxychloroquine sulfate, methylprednisolone tablets, calcitriol capsules, and vitamin D calcium) in treating RSA patients with antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive but could not be diagnosed with autoimmune diseases (AID) through assessment of treatment-related impact on subsequent pregnancy outcomes and adverse reactions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method of the Study</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who took medication regularly were defined as the observation group (125 cases), and patients who did not take medication or took medication less than 1 month as the control group (86 cases). According to the ANA titer, patients were further divided into subgroups of 1:100, 1:320, and 1:1000, respectively.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Comparison of the observation and the control groups without ANA subgrouping showed that the live birth rate in the observation group was higher (odds ratio 3.312, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and the miscarriage rate was lower than that of the control group (odds ratio 0.302, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Statistically significant results were obtained in ANA titer 1:100 subgrouping (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference between the observation groups and the control groups for the ANA titers 1:320 and 1:1000. No statistically significant differences were observed in pregnancy rate, birthweight, neonatal 1-min Apgar score, and incidence of pregnancy complications between the observation and the control groups. Besides, the treatment showed a low incidence of adverse effects.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In summary, RSA patients who are ANA positive (titer 1:100) but not yet diagnosed as AID can have improved pregnancy outcomes after treatment.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13289,"journal":{"name":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","volume":"13 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iid3.70216","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of Treatment and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Antinuclear Antibody-Positive Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion\",\"authors\":\"Ancong Wang,&nbsp;Fengxia Wu,&nbsp;Min Liu,&nbsp;Zhenchun Zhang,&nbsp;Shuxia Li,&nbsp;Qihua Tan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/iid3.70216\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The etiology of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) has not been clearly defined. The role of autoantibodies in RSA has particularly attracted much attention.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>A retrospective analysis was performed to explore the combinatory efficacy of five drugs (aspirin enteric-coated tablets, hydroxychloroquine sulfate, methylprednisolone tablets, calcitriol capsules, and vitamin D calcium) in treating RSA patients with antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive but could not be diagnosed with autoimmune diseases (AID) through assessment of treatment-related impact on subsequent pregnancy outcomes and adverse reactions.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method of the Study</h3>\\n \\n <p>Patients who took medication regularly were defined as the observation group (125 cases), and patients who did not take medication or took medication less than 1 month as the control group (86 cases). According to the ANA titer, patients were further divided into subgroups of 1:100, 1:320, and 1:1000, respectively.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Comparison of the observation and the control groups without ANA subgrouping showed that the live birth rate in the observation group was higher (odds ratio 3.312, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001), and the miscarriage rate was lower than that of the control group (odds ratio 0.302, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Statistically significant results were obtained in ANA titer 1:100 subgrouping (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). There was no significant difference between the observation groups and the control groups for the ANA titers 1:320 and 1:1000. No statistically significant differences were observed in pregnancy rate, birthweight, neonatal 1-min Apgar score, and incidence of pregnancy complications between the observation and the control groups. Besides, the treatment showed a low incidence of adverse effects.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>In summary, RSA patients who are ANA positive (titer 1:100) but not yet diagnosed as AID can have improved pregnancy outcomes after treatment.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13289,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease\",\"volume\":\"13 6\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/iid3.70216\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70216\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunity, Inflammation and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/iid3.70216","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景复发性自然流产(RSA)的病因尚未明确。自身抗体在RSA中的作用尤其受到关注。目的回顾性分析阿司匹林肠溶片、硫酸羟氯喹、甲基强的松龙片、骨化三醇胶囊、抗核抗体(ANA)阳性,但通过评估治疗相关对妊娠结局和不良反应的影响,无法诊断为自身免疫性疾病(AID)的RSA患者。研究方法定期服药的患者为观察组(125例),未服药或服药不足1个月的患者为对照组(86例)。根据ANA滴度将患者进一步分为1:100、1:20 20、1:1000的亚组。结果观察组与无ANA亚组的对照组比较,观察组活产率高于对照组(优势比3.312,p < 0.001),流产率低于对照组(优势比0.302,p < 0.001)。ANA滴度1:100亚组结果具有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。观察组与对照组ANA滴度1:20 0、1:1000差异无统计学意义。观察组与对照组在妊娠率、出生体重、新生儿1分钟Apgar评分、妊娠并发症发生率方面均无统计学差异。此外,该治疗方法不良反应发生率低。结论ANA阳性(滴度1:100)但未诊断为aids的RSA患者经治疗后妊娠结局改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Analysis of Treatment and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Antinuclear Antibody-Positive Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

Analysis of Treatment and Subsequent Pregnancy Outcomes in Patients With Antinuclear Antibody-Positive Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion

Background

The etiology of recurrent spontaneous abortion (RSA) has not been clearly defined. The role of autoantibodies in RSA has particularly attracted much attention.

Objective

A retrospective analysis was performed to explore the combinatory efficacy of five drugs (aspirin enteric-coated tablets, hydroxychloroquine sulfate, methylprednisolone tablets, calcitriol capsules, and vitamin D calcium) in treating RSA patients with antinuclear antibody (ANA)-positive but could not be diagnosed with autoimmune diseases (AID) through assessment of treatment-related impact on subsequent pregnancy outcomes and adverse reactions.

Method of the Study

Patients who took medication regularly were defined as the observation group (125 cases), and patients who did not take medication or took medication less than 1 month as the control group (86 cases). According to the ANA titer, patients were further divided into subgroups of 1:100, 1:320, and 1:1000, respectively.

Results

Comparison of the observation and the control groups without ANA subgrouping showed that the live birth rate in the observation group was higher (odds ratio 3.312, p < 0.001), and the miscarriage rate was lower than that of the control group (odds ratio 0.302, p < 0.001). Statistically significant results were obtained in ANA titer 1:100 subgrouping (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the observation groups and the control groups for the ANA titers 1:320 and 1:1000. No statistically significant differences were observed in pregnancy rate, birthweight, neonatal 1-min Apgar score, and incidence of pregnancy complications between the observation and the control groups. Besides, the treatment showed a low incidence of adverse effects.

Conclusion

In summary, RSA patients who are ANA positive (titer 1:100) but not yet diagnosed as AID can have improved pregnancy outcomes after treatment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease
Immunity, Inflammation and Disease Medicine-Immunology and Allergy
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
146
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Immunity, Inflammation and Disease is a peer-reviewed, open access, interdisciplinary journal providing rapid publication of research across the broad field of immunology. Immunity, Inflammation and Disease gives rapid consideration to papers in all areas of clinical and basic research. The journal is indexed in Medline and the Science Citation Index Expanded (part of Web of Science), among others. It welcomes original work that enhances the understanding of immunology in areas including: • cellular and molecular immunology • clinical immunology • allergy • immunochemistry • immunogenetics • immune signalling • immune development • imaging • mathematical modelling • autoimmunity • transplantation immunology • cancer immunology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信