Alberto Jarrin Lopez , Amartya Dave , Tejas Sathe , Hanmin Lee
{"title":"外科医生对唯一设备标识符(UDI)捕获的入门:我们在植入物监测方面处于什么位置?我们如何改进?","authors":"Alberto Jarrin Lopez , Amartya Dave , Tejas Sathe , Hanmin Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.hsr.2025.100234","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Unique Device Identifier (UDI) system was developed to improve the identification and tracking of medical devices throughout their lifecycle. Despite its potential to enhance patient outcomes, streamline supply chain management, and facilitate swift responses to device recalls, widespread adoption remains limited. In the absence of regulatory policies enforcing standardized UDI practices, this paper underscores the critical role surgeons play in implementing and advocating for UDI’s utility within their institutions. By reviewing published roadmaps and playbooks, we highlight key steps for successful adoption. We examine case studies from early adopter institutions—Mercy Health, Duke University Health System, and Kaiser Permanente—that have successfully integrated UDI systems, demonstrating tangible benefits. Recognizing the barriers to nationwide UDI implementation as well as the unique role of surgeons at the intersection of patient care and device innovation, we conclude by proposing practical, actionable steps for surgeons to drive change within their institution.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":73214,"journal":{"name":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100234"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A surgeon’s primer on Unique Device Identifier (UDI) capture: Where do we stand on implant surveillance and how can we improve?\",\"authors\":\"Alberto Jarrin Lopez , Amartya Dave , Tejas Sathe , Hanmin Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.hsr.2025.100234\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Unique Device Identifier (UDI) system was developed to improve the identification and tracking of medical devices throughout their lifecycle. Despite its potential to enhance patient outcomes, streamline supply chain management, and facilitate swift responses to device recalls, widespread adoption remains limited. In the absence of regulatory policies enforcing standardized UDI practices, this paper underscores the critical role surgeons play in implementing and advocating for UDI’s utility within their institutions. By reviewing published roadmaps and playbooks, we highlight key steps for successful adoption. We examine case studies from early adopter institutions—Mercy Health, Duke University Health System, and Kaiser Permanente—that have successfully integrated UDI systems, demonstrating tangible benefits. Recognizing the barriers to nationwide UDI implementation as well as the unique role of surgeons at the intersection of patient care and device innovation, we conclude by proposing practical, actionable steps for surgeons to drive change within their institution.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73214,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100234\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632025000261\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health sciences review (Oxford, England)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772632025000261","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A surgeon’s primer on Unique Device Identifier (UDI) capture: Where do we stand on implant surveillance and how can we improve?
The Unique Device Identifier (UDI) system was developed to improve the identification and tracking of medical devices throughout their lifecycle. Despite its potential to enhance patient outcomes, streamline supply chain management, and facilitate swift responses to device recalls, widespread adoption remains limited. In the absence of regulatory policies enforcing standardized UDI practices, this paper underscores the critical role surgeons play in implementing and advocating for UDI’s utility within their institutions. By reviewing published roadmaps and playbooks, we highlight key steps for successful adoption. We examine case studies from early adopter institutions—Mercy Health, Duke University Health System, and Kaiser Permanente—that have successfully integrated UDI systems, demonstrating tangible benefits. Recognizing the barriers to nationwide UDI implementation as well as the unique role of surgeons at the intersection of patient care and device innovation, we conclude by proposing practical, actionable steps for surgeons to drive change within their institution.